I think the majority of the confusion comes from the phrase "expressly permitted". Depending on the company, I may or may not carry there based on that policy. However, I would certainly carry to the office and then secure my firearm in my vehicle as the parking lot law "expressly permit[s]" that (barring one of the various exceptions, of course).bdickens wrote:What's confusing? You are not allowed to posses or use weapons on company premises unless you are permitted to by state or local law. With a CHL, the state permits you to carry a concealed handgun everywhere you go with certain statutorily defined exceptions.
Search found 3 matches
Return to “Work policy confusing”
- Tue Mar 19, 2013 3:18 pm
- Forum: New to CHL?
- Topic: Work policy confusing
- Replies: 15
- Views: 2439
Re: Work policy confusing
- Mon Mar 11, 2013 3:35 pm
- Forum: New to CHL?
- Topic: Work policy confusing
- Replies: 15
- Views: 2439
Re: Work policy confusing
This cannot be legally construed as effective notice as it does not use the 30.06 language. Written notice must be 30.06.Redneck_Buddha wrote:Right, just as I thought...it seems to be a boiler plate manual that ADP publishes for all its clients' workplaces. Hopefully we'll get some good clarification because to me it could be read several ways (i.e. 30.06).
- Mon Mar 11, 2013 3:33 pm
- Forum: New to CHL?
- Topic: Work policy confusing
- Replies: 15
- Views: 2439
Re: Work policy confusing
The way I read this policy is that you may not carry while at work, but they can't stop you from carrying and storing your firearm in you vehicle (parking lot law). Now, my interpretation may or may not be correct, however, it is not 30.06 language, therefore you can legally ignore it and carry away, but you could be terminated if discovered. As usual, concealed means concealed. YMMV.
Just my $0.02.
Just my $0.02.