TexasCHLforum.com

I keep watching this over and over again, and still come to the same conclusion, this officer is not in a good mood that day, and really did not want to deal with another one of these "i know the law better than you, how dare you interrupt my day, i have 0 respect for law enforcement" kind of peoples, which are very common down here in austin and san marcos tx. The point where the guy touches the police officer though still makes me feel that it was justified, however his attitude is not. It reminds me of that other video a bit of the police officer in cleveland who doesn't even give the driver a chance to produce his CHL and goes ballistic when he finds out he is carrying a gun.

MedicMan218 wrote:

steve817 wrote:I always felt that TASER's were supposed to be an alternative to deadly force not a means of bending the will of someone else to your own. If the person came out swinging or acting like it, then by all means fire away. I have seen many examples of officers using them when there could have been another way. However I have never walked in their shoes.

That's what I thought, now it appears to be the ultimate attitude correction device

It must get so annoying to have to constantly deal with people like thatbkidbwhich from beget go are disrespectful and challenge the officer, granted it seems like that officer is having a bad day, but the kid did should have shut up and had his license instead of irritating the officer....did he deserve a taze? The moment he touched the officer sealed his fate, that's a no no