TexasCHLforum.com

"...But what I don't see is the logic in thinking that a letter that mentions nothing about the signs being non-complaint, will cause them to post compliant signs. That just seems nonsensical to me..."
...I don't either, and I didn't read that into your letter which, taken as it was written, would deal with their attitude about 2A and NOT their method of placing signage...I was commenting only on the futility of contesting the point with them that they'd posted at all...and I WAS being pessimistic

terryg wrote:

speedsix wrote: ...IMPROPERLY worded signs may be:
1)due to ignorance...we have nothing to gain by educating them

Your probably right ... most of the time. However, there are a few occasions where CHL holders did gain by educating them as shown in this thread.

...I stand corrected...great example...I've bumped a lotta wasp's nests in my life...a coupla times got away without a sting...my policy is try not to bump wasp's nests...

...looks like the allcaps above were used for emphasis...no anger implied...the anger/frustration was expressed in small letters in the preceding sentence...

...we all know what PROPERLY worded signs mean...I have contacted business owners/managers about my feelings on them...to no avail...

...IMPROPERLY worded signs may be:
1)due to ignorance...we have nothing to gain by educating them
2)the owner/manager's way of pacifying the corporate, insurance, or superior's orders and still keeping the door open for our business...let sleeping dogs lie and don't make a point of the error so that they can correct it..

...if we quietly go about our business, obeying the letter of the law...the chances are slim that we will ever have a discussion with the management/employers...and end up getting them to PROPERLY post ...concealed weapons just aren't a topic of conversation when they're concealed...why give them a chance to notify us verbally that they're off-limits?


...so, if they do it CORRECTLY...comply...if they do it WRONG...walk on by...