TexasCHLforum.com

gemini wrote:

anygunanywhere wrote:The level of my remorse at using a motorcycle and rider as a speed bump is indirectly proportional to the stupidity of their actions while in front of me should something go wrong with their poorly chosen risky behavior.

Mrs. Anygun and I had this very discussion as we watched a stunt idjit on I-45 southbound on our way to Galveston one afternoon.

Anygunanywhere

...and if something should go wrong with your inept driving skills? Your level of remorse would be what?
None? Because you just ran over a man who will never go home to his kids, his wife, his family again.
Rider's fault or not. I don't see the humor in your post, or was it just bravado from someone who's never
seen a motorcycle fatality? Have a nice day.

Did you ever see the photo of the t-boned sedan of the family of four killed when a motorcycle struck them at over 130 mph? What about their right not to have to be killed by an idiot breaking the driving law? I rode motorcycle for years, year-round in Seattle. That does not give me a right to preach to auto drivers who just want to go down the road without someone putting them in more danger than normal. A person's right to do stupid things ends when it places others in imminent danger.

IF you don't want none, don't start none is what comes to mind. Also birds of a feather flock together. If you sleep with the dogs, you're going to get fleas.

Any other platitudes you'd like me to cite as to why my conservative self does not mind law enforcement cracking down on rogue motorcyclists?