TexasCHLforum.com

TexasCajun wrote:

sugar land dave wrote:This is a sad state of affairs and the death of a great individual so I understand the concerns of all, yet I do not think I can stand much more conspiracy theory on a non-conspiracy theory forum. I can research and pm links to appropriately far-out sites if someone really wants to visit the wild side. Just not here please.

Enough with the conspiracy theory. If that's what gets you going, please start a new thread so that this one can be updated with actual events.

WildBill wrote:

LSUTiger wrote:The CIA Heart Attack Gun apparently really exists. A quick google search pulls up numerous articles about it. If it really works or not using 1975 technology? IDK. But I think if we can fake a moon landing we can perfect technologies to effect hard to detect cause of death by 2016. Technology has gotten better in 41 years I'm sure.

Whether or not a it was used in Scalia's death or even if a conspiracy exist, is up for debate.

People question events and its OK but if infowars comes up with the same questions, suddenly it's not credible?

The idea is simple IMHO, it's possible and it's fishy. The timing is perfect. Too perfect.

Since 1972 we've lost our ability to fake moon landings. That's why we haven't been back since.

It's because have been working our ability to fake Mars landing next.

mojo84 wrote:Guys, I just can't consider anything from Infowars as credible.

They've just been wrong with too many of their conspiracy theories. While I do belief there are some fishy things surrounding this, I do not think Infowars is a credible source to use.

The CIA Heart Attack Gun apparently really exists. A quick google search pulls up numerous articles about it. If it really works or not using 1975 technology? IDK. But I think if we can fake a moon landing we can perfect technologies to effect hard to detect cause of death by 2016. Technology has gotten better in 41 years I'm sure.

Whether or not a it was used in Scalia's death or even if a conspiracy exist, is up for debate.

People question events and its OK but if infowars comes up with the same questions, suddenly it's not credible?

The idea is simple IMHO, it's possible and it's fishy. The timing is perfect. Too perfect.

The CIA Heart Attack Gun