TexasCHLforum.com

For clarification, I never said he was wrong or that he violated TPC 30.06 nor did I say the sign was in a "good" place. I merely stated "in a nutshell" if he ignored the sign he would be wrong (per law) and that the sign (from description) appeared to be legally binding - Even with the placement. Personally I detest 30.06 signs and commend him for leaving (that is the reason I make my own potato and egg burritos - Thanks Taco Cabana).

I guess I wasn't as specific as I could have been, but I agree 100% with all posts after mine!!!!!

And Mr Cotton, You are right, I was merely taking into account the "renter"

Bryan

Everyone who wants to rent a room has to go to that desk, Now I think up until you saw the sign you would be good to go. Once you see the sign and it meets the requirements (i.e. Letters correct size, appropriate verbiage, in both languages and in conspicuous place). Nothing requires it be on the door or on every door. Granite, you would have to "know about the sign" in order to be given effective notice. At the point he was at, he was given effective written notice.

Whether or not I agree, since I believe if it a place you will be sleeping (renting) then you should be able to anyway, that is the law.

Bryan

In my opinion that is pretty conspicuous. Good Choice to not patronize the establishment. I think I would have pointed to the sign and said something to the effect "You prohibit law abiding citizens from the right to protect themselves, what have to done to prevent those who care nothing about laws from attacking me? I'll take my business somewhere that isn't an UNARMED VICTIM ZONE!"

Note: The all caps is strictly because I was already using quotation marks.\

Bryan

Edit: Yes I believe it would hold up in court, it has met the requirements outlined in TPC 30.06