Search found 4 matches

by goose
Wed Nov 23, 2016 10:52 am
Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
Topic: 80% Glock - deep concealment
Replies: 24
Views: 5832

Re: 80% Glock - deep concealment

locke_n_load wrote:
goose wrote:
Jago668 wrote:Why not just carry a G26, and then spare G17 mags?
This kind of logic will NOT be tolerated around here! :-)

Although I will admit a wish to take this the other direction. I'd like a 17 slide on my 26 lower. Nice sight radius, small handle above my belt. The product shown kind of does this but with the added bonus of a really compromised grip and a need to assemble. I also assume that it comes with a belt clip because I can't imagine that bad boy in a holster or IWB.
Just buy a G17 and cut the grip down to accept G26 mags.
Having worked on a sub-2k to take the G19 magazines, the thought has crossed my mind. And I really do like the idea. BUT emotionally it feels 100 times more difficult to carve on a Glock frame than a Kel-Tec. And I'm not dissing the Kel-Tec but one was (when we bought ours) a $240 frame and one is a $500 frame. A few more years to soak up with the teenaged boys. After they leave the nest and my dollars free up a skosh, this might be pretty high on my list.
by goose
Wed Nov 23, 2016 10:09 am
Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
Topic: 80% Glock - deep concealment
Replies: 24
Views: 5832

Re: 80% Glock - deep concealment

barres wrote:I believe someone is thinking pocket carry for this setup, hence the comparison in size to a cell phone that many throw into a pocket these days.
I think you're right. But as a G17 owner, I can't imagine that slide (even with the tiny grip frame) in a front pocket. At least not if I was expecting to ever have to sit.

I was hoping someone would come up with a cool "I could use it here..." scenario. I haven't heard one yet. They may find customers but I am doubtful that they'd find enough to justify production runs of any size.
by goose
Wed Nov 23, 2016 7:34 am
Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
Topic: 80% Glock - deep concealment
Replies: 24
Views: 5832

Re: 80% Glock - deep concealment

Jago668 wrote:Why not just carry a G26, and then spare G17 mags?
This kind of logic will NOT be tolerated around here! :-)

Although I will admit a wish to take this the other direction. I'd like a 17 slide on my 26 lower. Nice sight radius, small handle above my belt. The product shown kind of does this but with the added bonus of a really compromised grip and a need to assemble. I also assume that it comes with a belt clip because I can't imagine that bad boy in a holster or IWB.
by goose
Tue Nov 22, 2016 6:53 pm
Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
Topic: 80% Glock - deep concealment
Replies: 24
Views: 5832

Re: 80% Glock - deep concealment

not poo-pooing it out of hand but it looks like a possible finger biter (where the grip edge is against the magazine). I would also say as a conceal carry gun, it takes the debate about "one in the chamber" to a whole new level.

Waiting to hear some ideas that others might come up with for a niche it fills. I am open.

Return to “80% Glock - deep concealment”