tacticool wrote:Did they pass? Were they safe?DFWTT wrote:Some of the students had never pulled a trigger.
New shooters don't worry me as much as the guys who think they know everything already.
Answers: 1) Yes 2) No. absolutely not.
No, I am not taking any anti stand and I am offended that you would even suggest that. Apparently you did not read the entire thread before chiming in with an uninformed opinion. To RESTATE: I am not for any type of further restrictions. This is a personal responsibility issue that should be addressed either by the individual or the course staff prior to arrival at said course. Your choice. As has been discovered WITHIN the thread, so reponsible CHL instructors are already taking steps to correct the initial deficiency and thus both avoiding incident and increasing the comfort level of those persons attending. Some, however, are not. Those two topics are the ones under discussion, personal responsibility and course( non regulated) responsibility, not what you ave suggested. As for your CHL, I could care less.txdang wrote:Aren't you in a sense taking a similar stand to the anti's when you say that a person can exercise a 2A act, but only under certain conditions? I agree that inexperienced people with a gun is a scary thing, but how can you support 2A and restrict the right to bear arms? I've read similar threads and according to them I should go ahead and just send back my CHL.