TexasCHLforum.com

OldCannon wrote:I'd have been inclined to agree with your predictions about the "Obama Lite" thing, but the Dems have been gleefully committing political suicide for the last 3 years, with Obama proudly leading and crowing about their gaffes. I swear, right now an empty, 2 year old jar of mayonnaise could whip Obama.

Bring on the mayo!

The President's skin color doesn't bother me. What bothers me are his policies and his lack of respect for the constitution.

Wrapping up Obama's policies in the package of some rich White guy isn't hope. It isn't real change. It's "4-more-years of Obama" with a different paint job.

I'm voting against Obama's policies this year, no matter what party tries to push unconstitutional big government down my throat.

sjfcontrol wrote:

there is no cake wrote:Third party here I come!

So you're voting for the spoiler?

Voting for a conservative, regardless of party affiliation, is the best chance to spoil their plan to have four more years of Obama's policies.

Voting in a fresh face with the same policies (e.g. government talking away health care choices) is like reupholstering the deck chairs on the Titanic. We need real hope and real change.

The whole thing could be avoided if the Republicans nominate a conservative but they seem committed to giving Romney the nomination because it's "his turn" this year. The herd of rinos can rant and whine and cast blame all they want, but the first step to recovery is admitting they have a problem. There's still time but the clock is ticking.




Dear Republicans,

You gave McCain the nomination because it was "his turn" in 2008.

How's that working for you?

Oldgringo wrote:We must support the Republican candidate, even if he is not our first choice. To do otherwise is a vote for the current POTUS.

In exactly the same way a vote for Romney is a vote for Al Qaeda.

The Annoyed Man wrote:The woman he was having an affair out of wedlock with at the time, leading to his wife's asking for a divorce? The exact same adulteress who now accuses him of serial adultery and of being unfaithful to her. The hypocrisy is beyond belief. In the meantime, ABC's overtly political hack job on behalf of the democrats fails to mention that little detail.

If they'll cheat with you, they'll cheat on you.

RockingRook wrote:The Republicans have been so busy beating each other up they forgot about
attacking Obama. Yes, they could be using their own campaigns to attack all of Obama's failed policies
and offering a solution to them. Instead of attacking each other with nonsense.

Other than the Bain Capital detour, most all the attacks on Romney can double as attacks on Obama. But I agree, if Romney gets the nomination, there's really nothing for Mitt to attack Barack on, and Obama's reelection is in the bag.

I hope you're wrong TAM, because I'm not voting for someone who supports Obamacare and gun control, no matter what party backs him.

Is it too late to change my vote back to Perry?

Medic624 wrote:I find it VERY alarming when the MSM picks Romney (or any of the candidates) as the front runner and doesn't attack him as they have others who are a threat to derail the Obama re-election train.

Alarming yes but I hope you're not surprised the MSM backs the Democrats' first choice of opponents for Obama.

The Annoyed Man wrote:

hirundo82 wrote:

mamabearCali wrote:Gingrich/Rice Gingrich/Santorum----works for me. Let me know where to get the bumper sticker at.

Either of those tickets would guarantee Obama a second term. I, and I expect many other independents, would sit out the election rather than vote for either of those.

You would rather see another Obama term than vote for the one candidate that has even a chance of beating him? Wow.

I understand that reaction to Romney, because he and Obama are both socialists, and Obama signed more pro gun bills. I don't understand that reaction to Gingrich except from false flag RINOs who want more socialism. Personally, I think Newt would make a better vp than potus but I like him a lot better than Mitt or Herman. I'm not thrilled with Santorum either for personal reasons but I would hold my nose and vote for Newt despite that choice of vp.