TexasCHLforum.com

goose wrote:

JP171 wrote:sorry guys, but what I see is a lot of self rationalization of false hopes or trying to justify by saying something is ambiguous when its not. by reading the standard recognized definition of belt holster and even looking at pictures of belt holsters the normally used definition is that the holster MUST attach directly to the belt worn about the waist and have integral belt loops without other attachments and no other way to attach said holster such as paddle or clips. Shoulder isn't really being discussed but my belief is that it must be the usual and customary type of shoulder holster.
feel free to armchair this to death, oh yea you've all already done this and rationalized everything you want to do no matter what the customary and usual definition.....isn't there another thread in the OC area that someone is doing the same thing? tomato or tomaahhhto, its all the same red fruit. so of course do as you choose and make that horse get up and pull the wagon, but its still dead

Just to be contrarian, your definition is no better than anyone else's until it has been decided in a court of law for precedence. Which dictionary, legal or regular Webster type, said that paddles weren't allowed?