They're still saying it's an sks, wfaa just showed it and said its an sks which is a very old rifle and a precursor to the ar15The Annoyed Man wrote:"Reporters" also insisted it was an AR15........and then an SKS........ I believe that's him.suthdj wrote:Yes it does, but as the reported described it there wasn't much left but a splatter. The reporter could be wrong but he went into great detail to make sure it was understood nothing was left. Maybe somebody here in the medical field can explain how much is need to do a toxicological analysis.LAYGO wrote:The photo does look kinda like him (see the beard) and the clothing seen in the other video.suthdj wrote:From what i heard from FOX news was there wasn't enough left to do a toxicological test so i doubt that is him or news was wrong.LAYGO wrote:A photo of the dead gunman (he doesn't deserve to be named anymore) & his rifle have surfaced. The photo can be deemed graphic, but I've seen worse.
https://www.conservativeoutfitters.com/ ... ne-graphic
Turns out it's not an SKS, but a Saiga AK74 variant.
No one does any fact checking anymore