Kawabuggy wrote:I see that some of you agree with my earlier statements, and some of you don't. To those of you who disagree, let's talk about that word "de-escalation" that get's bandied about on this web site all the time.
If you go up to a bear in the woods and poke him with a stick and he attacks you, who is at fault? Remember he is just a bear and YOU are not going to change him, or his attitude. Now let's say that the bear is a metaphor for idiot drivers. It's all so clear, unless you let pride, arrogance, or attitude on your part enter the equation. By not removing yourself from the equation when an idiot driver is involved, it could be said that you are intentionally escalating a situation.
Sorry, gotta call you on that one. A guy in a car isn't a bear. He's a guy in a car. In the scenario we're discussing, he's a guy in a car doing something he's not supposed to do. We're the guy in the car dowing what we
are supposed to do. That's not escalating, and that's a pretty far reach you're employing to attempt to portray it as escalation.
In short - you're wrong.
Kawabuggy wrote:Let's use another example.. You drive by a Wal-Mart and see a suspected drug deal going down. Do you drive over so that you can observe while allowing them to see you? No you say? But yet, an idiot driver up in your face, causes you to shift mental gears to "self-appointed-road-policeman" in an instant.
Wrong again. A more accurate comparison would be "so you turn around and leave the area of Wal-Mart to avoid the possibility of confrontation". Proceeding to the Wal-Mart to finish your business would be comparable to remaining in your lane driving the speed you were driving.
Kawabuggy wrote:Those of you attempting to justify your position in regards to why you would not remove yourself from a potentially dangerous, or deadly, situation need to rethink your attitude.
Uh, no we don't. Just because you behave that way, doesn't mean we have to, or that we're wrong in not doing so.
Kawabuggy wrote: You are obviously escalating a situation that you can remove yourself from, if you are intelligent enough to do so. That being the key. Are you smart enough to over-ride that sense of pride, attitude, or arrogance? Some of you by your own admissions clearly are not. Maturity? Yep, I'd say that's a part of it, and a lack of it on your part to de-escalate a situation. Some of you are Billy-Bad-Ass sitting in anonymity behind the wheel of your vehicle with your tinted glass. Good for you.
See, that's where this whole bit of nonsense you're spouting becomes a problem. Because we don't do what you do, we lack intelligence, we're not smart enough, we have too much pride, attitude, and/or arrogance (not to mention we're lacking in maturity). The "Billy-Bad" is simply over the line.
You throw around "arrogance" a lot - I suggest you use that intelligence and smarts and learn another word - condescending.
Kawabuggy wrote:In regards to idiot drivers, I have a beautiful wife & kids at home waiting for me everyday. If I have to pull over a dozen times and wait 5 minutes each time to merge back into traffic to get home safely I'll do it. I can justify the extra few minutes of being a coward (as some of you have intimated) sitting on the side of the road to get home to hugs & kisses from my wife & kids. I don't know, maybe your wife & kids are not that important to some of you. Mine are. Have a great day!
Here's one to think about - the numbers you just gave, assuming you live another 20 years, that's roughly 220 days of your life you'd be giving up, all in order to avoid a confrontation that may not occur, and actually may even
escalate because of your attemps to avoid the "bear" behind the wheel.
I don't begrudge your opinion. I'm not going to even call you arrogant, immature, lacking intelligence, or even Billy-Scaredy. It'd be nice if you showed the same level of respect.