TexasCHLforum.com

http://www.nj.com/bergen/index.ssf/2012 ... rting.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Hilarity ensues.

You can be charged with disorderly conduct for passing gas here in Texas and you will lose your CHL.

He should have pulled a lighter instead.

I posted the same story, just a few minutes after the OP, but I did it with a twist. May I present the "The Words Fail Me thread?" http://texaschlforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=83&t=56090" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The Annoyed Man wrote:I posted the same story, just a few minutes after the OP, but I did it with a twist. May I present the "The Words Fail Me thread?" http://texaschlforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=83&t=56090" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

And yours got locked.

Keith B wrote:

The Annoyed Man wrote:I posted the same story, just a few minutes after the OP, but I did it with a twist. May I present the "The Words Fail Me thread?" http://texaschlforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=83&t=56090" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

And yours got locked.

You mean you cut one of TAM's posts?

baldeagle wrote:http://www.nj.com/bergen/index.ssf/2012 ... rting.html

Hilarity ensues.

This story proves that men over 60 will do stupid things without regard for consequences.

One should not have to apologize for the body's natural processes.

Pull my finger.

Anygunanywhere

Keith B wrote:You can be charged with disorderly conduct for passing gas here in Texas and you will lose your CHL.

Actually, the penal code definition of the offense is: "creates, by chemical means, a noxious and unreasonable odor in a public place." Sounds like a conventional fart, regardless of how deadly, would not get your CHL yanked.

talltex wrote:

Keith B wrote:You can be charged with disorderly conduct for passing gas here in Texas and you will lose your CHL.

Actually, the penal code definition of the offense is: "creates, by chemical means, a noxious and unreasonable odor in a public place." Sounds like a conventional fart, regardless of how deadly, would not get your CHL yanked.

Uh, how do you think that gas is created in the body?

hi-power wrote:

Keith B wrote:

The Annoyed Man wrote:I posted the same story, just a few minutes after the OP, but I did it with a twist. May I present the "The Words Fail Me thread?" http://texaschlforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=83&t=56090" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

And yours got locked.

You mean you cut one of TAM's posts?

Keith B graciously unlocked it when I explained what I was trying to do.

anygunanywhere wrote:One should not have to apologize for the body's natural processes.

Pull my finger.

Anygunanywhere

That lends new meaning to "Any gun, any where."

Keith B wrote:

talltex wrote:

Keith B wrote:You can be charged with disorderly conduct for passing gas here in Texas and you will lose your CHL.

Actually, the penal code definition of the offense is: "creates, by chemical means, a noxious and unreasonable odor in a public place." Sounds like a conventional fart, regardless of how deadly, would not get your CHL yanked.

Uh, how do you think that gas is created in the body?

I would argue in court that it's biological, not chemical.

WildBill wrote:

Keith B wrote:

talltex wrote:

Keith B wrote:You can be charged with disorderly conduct for passing gas here in Texas and you will lose your CHL.

Actually, the penal code definition of the offense is: "creates, by chemical means, a noxious and unreasonable odor in a public place." Sounds like a conventional fart, regardless of how deadly, would not get your CHL yanked.

Uh, how do you think that gas is created in the body?

I would argue in court that it's biological, not chemical.

I would argue that it is biochemical.