HB 2756 Open Carry bill reported favorably
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2011 9:27 pm
I don't know if this means anything at this late stage, but the House open carry bill was reported favorably without amendments.
The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
http://mail.texaschlforum.com/
Yesjordanmills wrote:Is there time for anything to get done about it?
Is there a companion bill in the senate? I didn't think so but I haven't been following the OC dark horse closely.steveincowtown wrote:Pardon my ignorance here, but can TSRA or NRA approach a Sentate member so that the companion bill (if it happens) has better language about 30.06 signs?
holy crud there is a lot of stupid comments by antis under that article. And wasn't the Hurst mayor a member of Bloombers MAIG group? Gee, I wonder why they picked him to talk to....TxLobo wrote:news story on open carry...? (if I missed it during a search, I apologize) ..
http://dfw.cbslocal.com/2011/04/28/stat ... -handguns/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
G.A. Heath wrote:<sarcasm>You mean it made it out of committee? I thought the TSRA, NRA, CHLforum, and others were conspiring to kill every chance for OC... Killing it in committee provides the best chance for success, so are they conspiring to let it pass so they look like they support it now?</sarcasm>
Had HB 2756 been left as originally drafted there would be no concern about 30.06. It was drafted as constitutional carry with no mention of 30.06 but certain "individuals" got their hands on it in League and changed it to licensed OC. Either way, this preoccupation with extra 30.06 signs is as silly as the blood in the streets talk 15 years ago when CHL got started. Think critically and stop believing everything you're fed.steveincowtown wrote:Pardon my ignorance here, but can TSRA or NRA approach a Sentate member so that the companion bill (if it happens) has better language about 30.06 signs?
There's nothing silly about the 30.06 concern and belittling those opinions doesn't help get open-carry passed.jecsd1 wrote:Had HB 2756 been left as originally drafted there would be no concern about 30.06. It was drafted as constitutional carry with no mention of 30.06 but certain "individuals" got their hands on it in League and changed it to licensed OC. Either way, this preoccupation with extra 30.06 signs is as silly as the blood in the streets talk 15 years ago when CHL got started. Think critically and stop believing everything you're fed.steveincowtown wrote:Pardon my ignorance here, but can TSRA or NRA approach a Sentate member so that the companion bill (if it happens) has better language about 30.06 signs?