No kidding! I think I enjoyed my hemorrhoid operation more than watching this thing get passed!suthdj wrote:OMG that was painful.
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
No kidding! I think I enjoyed my hemorrhoid operation more than watching this thing get passed!suthdj wrote:OMG that was painful.
When will we know?Charles L. Cotton wrote: I hope the deal is still in place.
Chas.
Wonder what the chances of that are.Vol Texan wrote:If only Abbott will sign it...NorthTexas wrote:House and Senate passed identical versions, just needs the Governor's signature now!
Noooooooooooooooooo!croc870 wrote:https://twitter.com/lmcgaughy/status/601889103483969536
If that is true, I would say that is a rookie mistake. Very disappointing.croc870 wrote:https://twitter.com/lmcgaughy/status/601889103483969536
A clean bill most have been part of the deal.....and that didn't happen so SB11 is a toss up....just my guess???Charles L. Cotton wrote:If the Huffines amendment was identical to the language in the House, then it's over and it goes to the Governor.Glockster wrote:Now, for the love of something, with all that has happened, where exactly does that leave things?
I still can't give any details, but I will say that campus-carry was very much a part of the proceedings. It has publicly disclosed that the Senate and House had cut a deal on HB910 and SB11, so I'm not disclosing anything confidential. The details are something else. Call your Representative and ask them to support SB11 and oppose amendments not acceptable to the author. I hope the deal is still in place.
Chas.
Looks like I misspoke earlier. I was sure I'd heard Huffines say his amendment was the exact same language as the Dutton amendment at some point today, guess I was wrong.croc870 wrote:https://twitter.com/lmcgaughy/status/601889103483969536
WHY????joe817 wrote:Noooooooooooooooooo!croc870 wrote:https://twitter.com/lmcgaughy/status/601889103483969536
"Senate secretary just confirmed to press that even if chamber adopts Huffines/Dutton amendment, would have to be concurred by House #txlege"
I thought the same.NorthTexas wrote:Looks like I misspoke earlier. I was sure I'd heard Huffines say his amendment was the exact same language as the Dutton amendment at some point today, guess I was wrong.croc870 wrote:https://twitter.com/lmcgaughy/status/601889103483969536
the amendment isn't quite identical. but she said didn't matter anyway b/c any amendment (even identical) would send it back
I've been following this since around 12:30pm today, and that's what I suspected as well.safety1 wrote:A clean bill most have been part of the deal.....and that didn't happen so SB11 is a toss up....just my guess???Charles L. Cotton wrote:If the Huffines amendment was identical to the language in the House, then it's over and it goes to the Governor.Glockster wrote:Now, for the love of something, with all that has happened, where exactly does that leave things?
I still can't give any details, but I will say that campus-carry was very much a part of the proceedings. It has publicly disclosed that the Senate and House had cut a deal on HB910 and SB11, so I'm not disclosing anything confidential. The details are something else. Call your Representative and ask them to support SB11 and oppose amendments not acceptable to the author. I hope the deal is still in place.
Chas.
Thanks for all your hard work Charles.