TexasCHLforum.com

The decision in this case is just nuts as Tome Greive states. I am going to go out on a limb and say it will be struck down, but when you have judicial minds that are nominated to the highest court in a state make a ruling such as this it is not the law is not their concern, but rather their personal opinions to backdoor altering the laws. Not just the 2nd Amendment, but the Bill of Rights. As Greive states it is crazy, but progressives judges included will do anything to get their way, including ignoring your rights.

When I was young I thought Judges were fair, honest and followed the law. They did not take sides, and they were impartial.

Then I became older.

I then thought that Courts of Appeals were fair, honest and followed the law. They did not take sides, and they were impartial.

Then I became much older and realized that no one was impartial and almost everyone looked out for themselves even supreme courts.

philip964 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 20, 2025 5:43 pm
Then I became much older and realized that no one was impartial and almost everyone looked out for themselves even supreme courts.

philip964 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 20, 2025 5:43 pm When I was young I thought Judges were fair, honest and followed the law. They did not take sides, and they were impartial.

Then I became older.

I then thought that Courts of Appeals were fair, honest and followed the law. They did not take sides, and they were impartial.

Then I became much older and realized that no one was impartial and almost everyone looked out for themselves even supreme courts.

I have a friend who is not a lawyer, but has argued his own cases, one all the way to the Texas Supreme Court (he did not prevail), though the judges thought he had an interesting argument on sovereign immunity. He has been successful in several instances. He was at one time suing several lawyers for conspiracy to defraud. He discovered his lawyers were working both sides in a real estate deal to help the seller. The judge ruled that he could only sue one lawyer. Totally defeated his conspiracy case. He pointed out to the judge one person can not be a conspiracy and was told by the judge that's not my problem.

This case hinges on the definition of public space used by the statute. It's not as bad as it sounds but it's definitely not good. Steve Lehto did a video on it and makes sound palatable.