Logic supporting BUG choice?

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1


Topic author
pfgrone
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 109
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 11:25 am
Location: Central Texas

Logic supporting BUG choice?

#1

Post by pfgrone »

Something that has eluded me for several years is the logic behind choosing a larger caliber handgun as a primary carry and a smaller caliber handgun as a back-up gun. It would seem to me that if a smaller caliber is inadequate as a primary carry defense weapon, then it would also be just as inadequate for use as a secondary, back-up weapon. And if a smaller caliber is adequate as a back-up gun, then why wouldn’t that smaller caliber be just as adequate as a primary carry.

I’m not trolling for an argument. Just wondering why someone (especially gun mag writers) often say that a smaller caliber, such as a .32 or .380, “would serve well as a back-up” but not as a primary weapon. :confused5
Paul G.
Have a nice day unless you've already made other plans.

BobCat
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 911
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: East Bernard, TX

Re: Logic supporting BUG choice?

#2

Post by BobCat »

Perhaps because it is smaller, lighter, and more concealable than your primary, and meant to be used only as a last ditch effort to end an attack if you have run your primary sidearm out of ammo or whatever.

I think your logic is correct. If it is an inadequate caliber there is no real point, except to have "something" instead of "nothing" once your primary sidearm is out of the picture.

I do not carry a backup. The actual chance that I will need to draw a weapon is quite small - it is there, but in 60 years I've never faced a situation requiring it, and I've gotten nothing but more careful and conservative over the years. I carry because it it prudent (the chance of needing it is small but not zero) and because I like to feel prepared; same reason I keep up with first-aid classes and CPR classes.

Since I carry a 9mm CZ75, were I to carry a BUG it would be a 5- or 6-shot revolver in .357 mag or 9mm (yes, there are some in 9 - another story). If I carried a 1911 (or other .45), selection of a BUG might be more difficult - might have to step down to a 9, .38, or .357 but I can not imagine someone who carries a .45 being comfortable with a .32 or .380 as a backup.

So - I think your logic is sound but I'm far from judging anything that anyone else chooses to carry.
Retractable claws; the *original* concealed carry
User avatar

TexasComputerDude
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 964
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 4:47 pm
Location: Lufkin, TX
Contact:

Re: Logic supporting BUG choice?

#3

Post by TexasComputerDude »

if someones going to kill me, I don't care if I'm shooting a rubberband gun back at him as long as I'm fighting him with something.
Glock 30 - main ccw
User avatar

DoubleJ
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2367
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:29 am
Location: Seattle, Washington

Re: Logic supporting BUG choice?

#4

Post by DoubleJ »

a .32 is a lot more effective at arm's length, than at 7yds, or down the hallway.
only thing I can think of.

If I was to carry a backup, and I have something that would suffice, it'd be a .38spl/.357Mag.
I have a 2" revolver that you could pass as either main or back-up carry.
FWIW, IIRC, AFAIK, FTMP, IANAL. YMMV.
User avatar

G.A. Heath
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2984
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 9:39 pm
Location: Western Texas

Re: Logic supporting BUG choice?

#5

Post by G.A. Heath »

My Primary carry is usually a Rock Island Armory Compact 1911 in 45acp, if not that then it will either be my Springfield Armory XD or my XDm (Both are .40S&W models). My backup gun is now a J-Frame snubby in .38special. My four main reasons for this as a backup gun is as follows:
  1. 1: Simple and reliable.
    2: Easier to conceal than my primary.
    3: Easy to explain how to operate to some who doesn't the weapon ("Its like a computer mouse, point and click") if I need to equip someone else.
    4. More options to conceal it on me.
I have carried a full size 1911 as my primary and a compact 1911 as my secondary, as the compact can use the full size magazines. I know a few glock owners who carry a full sized glock as their primary and a baby glock in the same caliber as a bug for magazine interchange.
How do you explain a dog named Sauer without first telling the story of a Puppy named Sig?
R.I.P. Sig, 08/21/2019 - 11/18/2019

OverEasy
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 591
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:02 pm
Location: NW of Houston

Re: Logic supporting BUG choice?

#6

Post by OverEasy »

For me it is the physical size of the pistol that defines my BUG. My primary carry is the largest one I can conceal for strong hand draw. My BUG would be the largest one I can conceal for weak hand draw.
Example; (big gun carry)
Sig P229/357sig on the strong side, Glock 33 or Taurus PT145 or S&W 442 or Kel-Tec p11 on the weak side.

Example; (small gun carry)
Kel-Tec P11 on the strong side, Kel-Tec P32 on the weak side.

Example; (no gun carry) Kel-Tec P32. :biggrinjester:

I just weighed a loaded 15 round Glock magazine(357sig Speer GD) just under 10 oz. My loaded Kel-Tec p32 with a Hogue handall grip and a pinky extension on the mag weighed just over 10 oz. The point I'm trying to make here is, I'd rather have a spare mag with 15 rounds of 357sig than a BUG with 8 rounds of 32acp. But if I feel I might need a spare gun and not just an extra mag. I'm going to pack something bigger than a P32.

My favorite carry is the Glock 33 on the strong side and either a 15 round(G31) spare magazine or a BUG. If the BUG is the Taurus PT145, it's hard to beat 11 rounds of 45acp for a BUG!

Regards, OE
NRA
TSRA
JPFO
American Legion
USN (69-77)
What did you expect?

gemini
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1104
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 3:01 pm

Re: Logic supporting BUG choice?

#7

Post by gemini »

BobCat wrote:Perhaps because it is smaller, lighter, and more concealable than your primary, and meant to be used only as a last ditch effort to end an attack if you have run your primary sidearm out of ammo or whatever.

I think your logic is correct. If it is an inadequate caliber there is no real point, except to have "something" instead of "nothing" once your primary sidearm is out of the picture.

I do not carry a backup. The actual chance that I will need to draw a weapon is quite small - it is there, but in 60 years I've never faced a situation requiring it, and I've gotten nothing but more careful and conservative over the years. I carry because it is prudent (the chance of needing it is small but not zero) and because I like to feel prepared.........

So - I think your logic is sound but I'm far from judging anything that anyone else chooses to carry.
:iagree: with the above statements. My everyday carry are .45's, in rotation, in various sizes. I have only felt the
need to carry a BUG 1 or 2 times. Normally, I will carry an extra magazine if I feel the threat level of the area I will
be in warrants. Otherwise, I'm good with a 8 round mag with one in the pipe.... 9 total .... I'm good to go.
:fire

srothstein
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5308
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:27 pm
Location: Luling, TX

Re: Logic supporting BUG choice?

#8

Post by srothstein »

As far as I know, there are two schools of thought on a BUG in law enforcement. The first school is that the two guns should both use the same ammunition, even working the same if possible (smaller version like Glock 27 for Glock 22). This simplifies the training and ammunition supply.

The second school of thought is that the BUG is a last ditch emergency weapon. It is meant to be used only after the main gun is rendered out of action or unable to be drawn. In these cases, you are more likely to be using the weaker hand and unable to support it properly. It is also likely you will be at much closer ranges (hand to hand grappling). This means a smaller gun in a smaller category is the better choice for a bug.

Obviously, there are good arguments for both sides of this debate. In the end it comes up to personal choice or departmental rules.

But, how would that transfer over to a CHL? Some of the concepts are going to be the same. The chances of a need for similarity of ammunition is less, but the chances of the need for similar handling are still there and maybe greater (muscle memory will count and police can train more). Is there even as great a need for a BUG for a CHL?

My conclusion is that it is all a matter of personal choice and your estimate of your needs. You can decide better than anyone when you think you are more likely to need a BUG and how familiar youa re with pistols to switch weapon type under stress. For me, now that I am not on patrol duty very often, I do not carry a BUG very often. If I go back to a patrol position, I will reevaluate my needs then. I also don't carry a BUG off duty very often (I can't remember the last time I did). My estimate of the needs for it just did not justify it for me.

Obviously, I also do not disagree with someone who has decided to carry one. Police magazine just had an article on a police shooting where the officer carried two BUGs and needed BOTH in the one case. I would probably have considered this crossing into paranoia, but it worked for him.
Steve Rothstein
User avatar

Fangs
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1229
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 9:18 pm
Location: San Marcos, TX

Re: Logic supporting BUG choice?

#9

Post by Fangs »

I've carried a Walther P22 as a BUG because it was the only other handgun I had besides my .40 PX4 Storm at the time. :grumble
"When I was a kid, people who did wrong were punished, restricted, and forbidden. Now, when someone does wrong, all of the rest of us are punished, restricted, and forbidden. The one who did the wrong is counselled and "understood" and fed ice cream." - speedsix
User avatar

USA1
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 7412
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 5:37 pm
Location: Tomball ,Texas
Contact:

Re: Logic supporting BUG choice?

#10

Post by USA1 »

two .45s...one at 9o'clock...one at 3o'clock
if i have to draw..well , you get the picture :cool:
Image
Glock Armorer - S&W M&P Armorer

apostate
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2336
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 10:01 am

Re: Logic supporting BUG choice?

#11

Post by apostate »

I think it's somewhat akin to the choice between having a "donut" or full size backup tire for your vehicle.

dicion
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2099
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 9:19 pm
Location: Houston Northwest

Re: Logic supporting BUG choice?

#12

Post by dicion »

usa1 wrote:two .45s...one at 9o'clock...one at 3o'clock
if i have to draw..well , you get the picture :cool:
To steal from the other thread...
Image
User avatar

gregthehand
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1399
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 5:48 pm
Location: NW Houston, TX

Re: Logic supporting BUG choice?

#13

Post by gregthehand »

I never carry a backup gun anywhere I go. Heck most of the time here lately I carry my .380 Kel-Tec as my primary and two knives as backup. I do carry a full size pistol in the truck. By the way I live and work in Houston and don't feel "naked" or anything not carrying a .45.
My posts on this website are worth every cent you paid me for them.

PX
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 49
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 1:55 pm
Location: SE Georgia

Re: Logic supporting BUG choice?

#14

Post by PX »

JMOfartO:

My "always" daily cc choice is my LWS380.

When wardrobe, wx, other circumstances allow I ALSO cc a 9mm pistol or 38 cal. revolver w/Lasergrips (CS9/HK P7/638 J-frame).

Obviously the larger the caliber, and the greater the capacity in your self defense choice is a plus if ever needed for self defense.

Bigger bullet, larger hole on the other end... :thumbs2:

Do I feel adequately armed with just my LWS380? Yep.. But then I don't buy or sell drugs, I avoid any community where the main street is named after a deceased preacher, and I avoid the "stop and rob" convenience stores late at night. I try and remain "situationly" (probably not a real word) aware of my surroundings, and on those times I have no choice and my lovely bride drags me out of my local comfort zone so she can spend money we don't have on things we don't need in a large community we don't live in I always TRY and add a larger caliber cc to the mix.

But if I simply cannnot cc a larger pistol or revolver, I rely on my ever faithful Seecamp...

Just personal opinion, no offense to those with contrary opinions..

Jesse

Image
"Laus Deo"
User avatar

USA1
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 7412
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 5:37 pm
Location: Tomball ,Texas
Contact:

Re: Logic supporting BUG choice?

#15

Post by USA1 »

PX wrote: I avoid any community where the main street is named after a deceased preacher
"rlol" :evil2: :iagree:
Glock Armorer - S&W M&P Armorer
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”