
Some don't bother with a CHL
Moderator: carlson1
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 1447
- Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 9:53 pm
Re: Some don't bother with a CHL
Consider what the court would do with an indigent individual apprehended while unquestionably traveling, say, from Baytown to Katy on foot with his gun concealed on his person. He can't afford a car, a bicycle or even a bus ticket. He is too afraid to hitch hike because of all the weirdos out there. Is he to be discriminated against based on his mode of transportm or lack thereof, while traveling?
Re: Some don't bother with a CHL
The UCW law predates cars so there's probably long standing case law for someone traveling by foot or horseback.casingpoint wrote:Consider what the court would do with an indigent individual apprehended while unquestionably traveling, say, from Baytown to Katy on foot with his gun concealed on his person. He can't afford a car, a bicycle or even a bus ticket. He is too afraid to hitch hike because of all the weirdos out there. Is he to be discriminated against based on his mode of transportm or lack thereof, while traveling?
minatur innocentibus qui parcit nocentibus
RED FLAG LAWS ARE HATE CRIMES
RED FLAG LAWS ARE HATE CRIMES
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 4
- Posts: 7412
- Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 5:37 pm
- Location: Tomball ,Texas
- Contact:
Re: Some don't bother with a CHL
you have two wivesGlockFan wrote:Both of my wifes parents carry without a permit.


Glock Armorer - S&W M&P Armorer
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 755
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 10:45 pm
- Location: Houston Texas Area
Re: Some don't bother with a CHL
I didn't carry before my CHL, but I'm a very law-abiding type citizen. I don't want to be the test case.
But I took my grandson to Moody Gardens in Galveston today. Before we went I had to do the obligitory search for any prohibitions against CC...
... and I'm tired of it.
The right to bear arms "shall not be abridged" should mean exactly that. We need to get to a point in this country where a law abiding citizen can carry anywhere and at any time.
OK, I'm off my soapbox now..
But I took my grandson to Moody Gardens in Galveston today. Before we went I had to do the obligitory search for any prohibitions against CC...
... and I'm tired of it.

The right to bear arms "shall not be abridged" should mean exactly that. We need to get to a point in this country where a law abiding citizen can carry anywhere and at any time.
OK, I'm off my soapbox now..

Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes... (Jefferson quoting Beccaria)
... tyrants accomplish their purposes ...by disarming the people, and making it an offense to keep arms. - Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story, 1840
Re: Some don't bother with a CHL
bdickens wrote:Shall not be infringed.

The RKBA shall not be infringed.
The OED shall not be abridged.

"Ees gun! Ees not safe!"
-
- Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 8:03 pm
- Location: Sugar Land Tx
Re: Some don't bother with a CHL
That didn't come out right did it?USA1 wrote:you have two wives

Jak Se Mas?
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 4
- Posts: 7412
- Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 5:37 pm
- Location: Tomball ,Texas
- Contact:
Re: Some don't bother with a CHL
GlockFan wrote:That didn't come out right did it?USA1 wrote:you have two wivesBut I am working on my next ex wife now!


Glock Armorer - S&W M&P Armorer
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 5312
- Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:27 pm
- Location: Luling, TX
Re: Some don't bother with a CHL
The law with the exception for traveling is still the same and covers all means of traveling. The MPA just made sure one specific type was included since most juries would not consider driving to and from work to be traveling. The hobo walking between two cities is clearly covered by the traveling exception.snorri wrote:The UCW law predates cars so there's probably long standing case law for someone traveling by foot or horseback.
Steve Rothstein
Re: Some don't bother with a CHL
That's why punctuation is critical:GlockFan wrote:That didn't come out right did it?USA1 wrote:you have two wivesBut I am working on my next ex wife now!
"My wives..." indicates more than one wife.
"My wives' parents..." indicates the parents of all of your multiple wives
"My wife's parents..." indicates the parents of your wife.
In either of the first two instances, you're probably in trouble, and permutations of item #2 are mind-boggling:
- You're married to two or more sisters, meaning you only have one set of in-laws.
- You married a daughter and a mother, in which case there would be two sets of in-laws from the same family.
- You married your own sisters, in which case your in-laws are also your parents (probably happens a lot in the deep south)
- You married two brothers, at which point your own parents might disown you (if you're also a guy).
- You married two completely unrelated women, but that are from terrorist countries, which will make it harder to get your CHL.
:)
Took class, paid fees, changed my mind. I want constitutional carry.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 1447
- Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 9:53 pm
Re: Some don't bother with a CHL
Perhaps a person traveling by auto, more the case today, could conceivably carry his weapon outside his or her vehicle in the course of traveling, without a CHL. Such as making a travel-related purchase inside a gas station, dining inside a restaurant, checking into a motel. Certainly a traveler on foot would not be expected to leaves his weapon concealed off his person during those times.That would cover a lot of bases without the hassle of a permit.he UCW law predates cars so there's probably long standing case law for someone traveling by foot or horseback.
-
- Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 130
- Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 6:06 pm
- Location: College Station, Texas
Re: Some don't bother with a CHL
I started carrying before I got my CHL. After taking a few handgun classes my eyes were opened.
Didn't cause any problems.
Applied for my CHL as soon as I turned 21 and been happy ever since.
Didn't cause any problems.
Applied for my CHL as soon as I turned 21 and been happy ever since.
CHL Class taken: 3/5/08
CHL Packet Sent: 3/24/08
CHL Packet Recieved by DPS: 3/25/08
Check Cleared: 4/1/08
PIN Number Recieved: 4/12/08
CHL Licence Issued/Active: 6/1/08
In the mailbox: 6/5/08
72 days.
1st Renewal
Online app.: 1/3/13
Class: 1/27/13
Mailed: 1/28/13
Paperwork received: 1/31/13
CHL Packet Sent: 3/24/08
CHL Packet Recieved by DPS: 3/25/08
Check Cleared: 4/1/08
PIN Number Recieved: 4/12/08
CHL Licence Issued/Active: 6/1/08
In the mailbox: 6/5/08
72 days.
1st Renewal
Online app.: 1/3/13
Class: 1/27/13
Mailed: 1/28/13
Paperwork received: 1/31/13
Re: Some don't bother with a CHL
What about spelling? He spelled it with "f" so I thought singular because the plural spelling has a "v" instead.jsimmons wrote:That's why punctuation is critical:
Like in Genesis 29?jsimmons wrote:- You're married to two or more sisters, meaning you only have one set of in-laws.

The information in this message is not provided in the course of a client relationship and is not intended as legal, accounting, or other professional advice.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 9316
- Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 7:13 pm
- Location: Arlington
Re: Some don't bother with a CHL
Oh you all are just plain silly.
Glock fan only left off the apostrophe, and you make an issue out of it. He got his point across to me, and I didn't see any humor in it until our forum jester pointed it out. Not saying any names now USA1, so rest easy. 


Diplomacy is the Art of Letting Someone Have Your Way
TSRA
Colt Gov't Model .380
TSRA
Colt Gov't Model .380