Some don't bother with a CHL

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1

User avatar

GlockFan
Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 153
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 8:03 pm
Location: Sugar Land Tx

Re: Some don't bother with a CHL

#16

Post by GlockFan »

Both of my wifes parents carry without a permit. :shock:
Jak Se Mas?

casingpoint
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1447
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 9:53 pm

Re: Some don't bother with a CHL

#17

Post by casingpoint »

Consider what the court would do with an indigent individual apprehended while unquestionably traveling, say, from Baytown to Katy on foot with his gun concealed on his person. He can't afford a car, a bicycle or even a bus ticket. He is too afraid to hitch hike because of all the weirdos out there. Is he to be discriminated against based on his mode of transportm or lack thereof, while traveling?
User avatar

snorri
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 398
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 2:45 pm
Contact:

Re: Some don't bother with a CHL

#18

Post by snorri »

casingpoint wrote:Consider what the court would do with an indigent individual apprehended while unquestionably traveling, say, from Baytown to Katy on foot with his gun concealed on his person. He can't afford a car, a bicycle or even a bus ticket. He is too afraid to hitch hike because of all the weirdos out there. Is he to be discriminated against based on his mode of transportm or lack thereof, while traveling?
The UCW law predates cars so there's probably long standing case law for someone traveling by foot or horseback.
minatur innocentibus qui parcit nocentibus

RED FLAG LAWS ARE HATE CRIMES
User avatar

USA1
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 7412
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 5:37 pm
Location: Tomball ,Texas
Contact:

Re: Some don't bother with a CHL

#19

Post by USA1 »

GlockFan wrote:Both of my wifes parents carry without a permit. :shock:
you have two wives :shock: :lol::
Glock Armorer - S&W M&P Armorer
User avatar

TLE2
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 755
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 10:45 pm
Location: Houston Texas Area

Re: Some don't bother with a CHL

#20

Post by TLE2 »

I didn't carry before my CHL, but I'm a very law-abiding type citizen. I don't want to be the test case.

But I took my grandson to Moody Gardens in Galveston today. Before we went I had to do the obligitory search for any prohibitions against CC...

... and I'm tired of it. :mad5

The right to bear arms "shall not be abridged" should mean exactly that. We need to get to a point in this country where a law abiding citizen can carry anywhere and at any time.

OK, I'm off my soapbox now.. :oops:
Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes... (Jefferson quoting Beccaria)

... tyrants accomplish their purposes ...by disarming the people, and making it an offense to keep arms. - Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story, 1840

bdickens
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2807
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 10:36 am
Location: Houston

Re: Some don't bother with a CHL

#21

Post by bdickens »

Shall not be infringed.
Byron Dickens
User avatar

boomerang
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2629
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 11:06 pm
Contact:

Re: Some don't bother with a CHL

#22

Post by boomerang »

bdickens wrote:Shall not be infringed.
:tiphat:

The RKBA shall not be infringed.

The OED shall not be abridged. "rlol"
"Ees gun! Ees not safe!"
User avatar

GlockFan
Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 153
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 8:03 pm
Location: Sugar Land Tx

Re: Some don't bother with a CHL

#23

Post by GlockFan »

USA1 wrote:you have two wives
That didn't come out right did it? :lol: But I am working on my next ex wife now!
Jak Se Mas?
User avatar

USA1
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 7412
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 5:37 pm
Location: Tomball ,Texas
Contact:

Re: Some don't bother with a CHL

#24

Post by USA1 »

GlockFan wrote:
USA1 wrote:you have two wives
That didn't come out right did it? :lol: But I am working on my next ex wife now!
"rlol" :cheers2:
Glock Armorer - S&W M&P Armorer

srothstein
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5312
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:27 pm
Location: Luling, TX

Re: Some don't bother with a CHL

#25

Post by srothstein »

snorri wrote:The UCW law predates cars so there's probably long standing case law for someone traveling by foot or horseback.
The law with the exception for traveling is still the same and covers all means of traveling. The MPA just made sure one specific type was included since most juries would not consider driving to and from work to be traveling. The hobo walking between two cities is clearly covered by the traveling exception.
Steve Rothstein

jsimmons
Banned
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 217
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 1:56 pm
Location: San Antonio

Re: Some don't bother with a CHL

#26

Post by jsimmons »

GlockFan wrote:
USA1 wrote:you have two wives
That didn't come out right did it? :lol: But I am working on my next ex wife now!
That's why punctuation is critical:

"My wives..." indicates more than one wife.
"My wives' parents..." indicates the parents of all of your multiple wives
"My wife's parents..." indicates the parents of your wife.

In either of the first two instances, you're probably in trouble, and permutations of item #2 are mind-boggling:

- You're married to two or more sisters, meaning you only have one set of in-laws.
- You married a daughter and a mother, in which case there would be two sets of in-laws from the same family.
- You married your own sisters, in which case your in-laws are also your parents (probably happens a lot in the deep south)
- You married two brothers, at which point your own parents might disown you (if you're also a guy).
- You married two completely unrelated women, but that are from terrorist countries, which will make it harder to get your CHL.

:)
Took class, paid fees, changed my mind. I want constitutional carry.

casingpoint
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1447
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 9:53 pm

Re: Some don't bother with a CHL

#27

Post by casingpoint »

he UCW law predates cars so there's probably long standing case law for someone traveling by foot or horseback.
Perhaps a person traveling by auto, more the case today, could conceivably carry his weapon outside his or her vehicle in the course of traveling, without a CHL. Such as making a travel-related purchase inside a gas station, dining inside a restaurant, checking into a motel. Certainly a traveler on foot would not be expected to leaves his weapon concealed off his person during those times.That would cover a lot of bases without the hassle of a permit.

BambooShoots
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 130
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 6:06 pm
Location: College Station, Texas

Re: Some don't bother with a CHL

#28

Post by BambooShoots »

I started carrying before I got my CHL. After taking a few handgun classes my eyes were opened.

Didn't cause any problems.

Applied for my CHL as soon as I turned 21 and been happy ever since.
CHL Class taken: 3/5/08
CHL Packet Sent: 3/24/08
CHL Packet Recieved by DPS: 3/25/08
Check Cleared: 4/1/08
PIN Number Recieved: 4/12/08
CHL Licence Issued/Active: 6/1/08
In the mailbox: 6/5/08
72 days.

1st Renewal
Online app.: 1/3/13
Class: 1/27/13
Mailed: 1/28/13
Paperwork received: 1/31/13
User avatar

Count
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 93
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 10:52 am
Contact:

Re: Some don't bother with a CHL

#29

Post by Count »

jsimmons wrote:That's why punctuation is critical:
What about spelling? He spelled it with "f" so I thought singular because the plural spelling has a "v" instead.
jsimmons wrote:- You're married to two or more sisters, meaning you only have one set of in-laws.
Like in Genesis 29? :lol:
The information in this message is not provided in the course of a client relationship and is not intended as legal, accounting, or other professional advice.
User avatar

joe817
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 9316
Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 7:13 pm
Location: Arlington

Re: Some don't bother with a CHL

#30

Post by joe817 »

Oh you all are just plain silly. :lol: Glock fan only left off the apostrophe, and you make an issue out of it. He got his point across to me, and I didn't see any humor in it until our forum jester pointed it out. Not saying any names now USA1, so rest easy. :biggrinjester:
Diplomacy is the Art of Letting Someone Have Your Way
TSRA
Colt Gov't Model .380
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”