Glock - 1911 merger

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1

User avatar

Topic author
A-R
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 5776
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 5:01 pm
Location: Austin area

Glock - 1911 merger

#1

Post by A-R »

So I'm tossing out a wild theory for discussion. May border on blasphemy to some on both "sides" but hear me out (this is a bit long-winded).

It's no secret I'm a Glock fan. But while I play along in the Glock vs. 1911 tit-for-tat, I truly admire and respect (and some day hope to own) a classic JMB-designed 1911. For my money, those two handgun designs are hands down the best in the history of the world. Doesn't really matter which is No. 1 and which is No. 2 - because third place is a distant afterthought, IMHO.

Closest I've owned to a 1911 was a Colt Mustang about 13 years ago. Great little gun. Wanted a larger caliber and didn't have the cash at the time to keep it and buy a bigger gun. So sold it and bought my Glock 23 ($500 mistake seeing used prices/values of the now discontinued Mustangs, but oh well). My biggest issue with the Mustang was how easily the grip frame would rust after a day of IWB carry unless I oiled it religiously every night.

Glock easily solved that problem with its polymer frame. And its tenifer slide and use of a lot of other polymer parts makes the gun durable and all but rust proof. The looser tolerances also make it likely the most reliable semi-auto handgun of all time. But even I admit the grip angle, blocky design, and double-stack mag makes learning to shoot the Glock well a bit of a challenge. Just like snub-nose revolvers, shooting a Glock well takes practice and developing a firm grip and muscle memory.

The 1911 design, on the other hand is a thing of pure beauty that points better than any gun I've ever held. With no practice at all I can hit bullseyes all day long at 10 yards with a properly sighted full-size 1911. But then I think of all the trouble of cleaning and oiling a 1911, parts that wear out faster (do Glock parts really EVER wear out?), etc and I think this is a gun I "want" but don't "need" and likely won't carry because for my purposes, a Glock just makes a better carry gun.

So - FINALLY - here's my crazy idea ...

A Glock 1911! Classic 1911 design with standard Government, Commander, and Officer sizes available (maybe even a smaller 9mm design too). A polymer frame with a tenifer-finished slide - or even an all tenifer version with a tenifered steel frame. All other parts are either stainless steel, tenifer finished, or polymer. Able to accept standard 1911 mags, holsters etc.

And here's the kicker ... offer the Glock 1911 in your choice of classic single-action design OR a version with a Glock safe-action striker-fired action (with or without additional thumb safety)

Yeah, yeah I know - blasphemy ... like a Chevy F150 or a Texas A&M Longhorn ....

But maybe, just maybe, this is what the gun world needs. An olive branch to both sides. This could be the start to world peace!

Or more likely it would be the biggest flop in the history handguns as both sides reject it like New Coke.

But at least I'm trying to bridge the divide ... can't we all just get along? :cheers2:

Rex B
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 3615
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 3:30 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Glock - 1911 merger

#2

Post by Rex B »

Someone out there makes a polymer-frame 1911 with stainless everything else.
Para Ordnance LDA 1911 is a great DA fire control design
-----------
“Sometimes there is no alternative to uncertainty except to await the arrival of more and better data.” C. Wunsch
User avatar

OldCannon
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 3058
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 11:19 am
Location: Converse, TX

Re: Glock - 1911 merger

#3

Post by OldCannon »

austinrealtor wrote:So I'm tossing out a wild theory for discussion. May border on blasphemy to some on both "sides" but hear me out (this is a bit long-winded).

...

Or more likely it would be the biggest flop in the history handguns as both sides reject it like New Coke.
As a happy owner of Glocks and 1911s, I just don't see the value in this proposition. What market are you appealing to? 1911 people would reject any "plastic guns" and Glock people would decry the incessant need for oiling, tuning, gunsmithing, and general oppressive weight. :evil2:

Honestly though...I like both for different reasons. One of the cool things about guns is that there are so many different mechanical solutions to the problem. The 1911 represents a century of "tried and true" for hammer-fired systems, and Glock represents several decades of "tried and true" for striker-fired.
I don't fear guns; I fear voters and politicians that fear guns.

RECIT
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1620
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 8:27 am
Location: Sugar Land, TX

Re: Glock - 1911 merger

#4

Post by RECIT »

STI makes a single or double stack polymer frame 1911 in single action only. Para is the only one I know offering any type or double action 1911. They also offer single or double stack mags, but not sure on the polymer frame from them. I also know Wilson Combat makes a polymer frame 1911 there again in single action only and I think its single stack mags only as well. You can never have your cake AND eat it...I will say there are some light weight aluminum frames offered from Para that are both single or double stack mags but no polymer frame. The aluminum will never rust but not quite as light as polymer though.
"I am a Free Man, regardless of what set of 'rules' surround me. When I find them tolerable, I tolerate them. When I find them obnoxious, I ignore them. I remain free, because I know and understand that I alone bear full responsibility for everything I do, or chose not to do."
User avatar

terryg
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 1719
Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2010 12:37 pm
Location: Alvin, TX

Re: Glock - 1911 merger

#5

Post by terryg »

Sorry AR, I already beat you to it in this post:

viewtopic.php?f=23&t=36823&p=437161&hil ... en#p437161" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Image
... this space intentionally left blank ...

Rex B
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 3615
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 3:30 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Glock - 1911 merger

#6

Post by Rex B »

I'd settle for a mini-1911 in .380 or 9mm with a Glock-style DA trigger.
I'd want mine in metal.
-----------
“Sometimes there is no alternative to uncertainty except to await the arrival of more and better data.” C. Wunsch
User avatar

terryg
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 1719
Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2010 12:37 pm
Location: Alvin, TX

Re: Glock - 1911 merger

#7

Post by terryg »

AndyC wrote:Image

Wilson Combat - Spec Ops 9 - but at $2,000, they can keep it.
Oh my. That just might be the prettiest hardware I have ever seen ...

I bet Chuck Norris carries one of those ...
... this space intentionally left blank ...

RECIT
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1620
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 8:27 am
Location: Sugar Land, TX

Re: Glock - 1911 merger

#8

Post by RECIT »

Chuck Norris would never carry a polymer gun...no matter how strong the plastic it crumbles in the hands of a legend...

But seriously, that is the Wilson model I was thinking of and I'm with Andy you can keep it for that price.

On the request for a mini-1911 Para and Springfield both offer something in a small platform that are in 9mm. Para is the only one with a DA trigger though. And their LDA trigger is not bad at all, but its not a crisp break like most single action 1911's.
"I am a Free Man, regardless of what set of 'rules' surround me. When I find them tolerable, I tolerate them. When I find them obnoxious, I ignore them. I remain free, because I know and understand that I alone bear full responsibility for everything I do, or chose not to do."
User avatar

OldCannon
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 3058
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 11:19 am
Location: Converse, TX

Re: Glock - 1911 merger

#9

Post by OldCannon »

terryg wrote: Oh my. That just might be the prettiest hardware I have ever seen ...

I bet Chuck Norris carries one of those ...
If I get something that pretty (and "dear"), it darn sure won't be a 9mm!!!!

I'll stick to my old adage: My 1911's are what I show to my friends. My Glocks are what I show to my enemies. :fire
I don't fear guns; I fear voters and politicians that fear guns.
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 26852
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Glock - 1911 merger

#10

Post by The Annoyed Man »

Rex B wrote:I'd settle for a mini-1911 in .380 or 9mm with a Glock-style DA trigger.
I'd want mine in metal.
Buy a Colt Government .380, or a Sig P238.

My Colt:
Image

Yes, I am wearing camo crocs. Shut up. :mrgreen:
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar

Topic author
A-R
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 5776
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 5:01 pm
Location: Austin area

Re: Glock - 1911 merger

#11

Post by A-R »

AndyC wrote:Wilson Combat - Spec Ops 9 - but at $2,000, they can keep it.
:iagree:

This is why it's gotta be a Glock to work. They already make $250 guns they sell for $525 retail. They should be able to make a Glock 1911 for about $400 and sell it for $800.
User avatar

Topic author
A-R
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 5776
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 5:01 pm
Location: Austin area

Re: Glock - 1911 merger

#12

Post by A-R »

terryg wrote:Sorry AR, I already beat you to it in this post:

viewtopic.php?f=23&t=36823&p=437161&hil ... en#p437161" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Image
No, that was just silly. I'm being completely serious :biggrinjester:
User avatar

terryg
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 1719
Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2010 12:37 pm
Location: Alvin, TX

Re: Glock - 1911 merger

#13

Post by terryg »

austinrealtor wrote: No, that was just silly. I'm being completely serious :biggrinjester:
Well, perhaps your right. But, it still has to be called the glockteeneleven. It just has too. :thumbs2:

Perhaps I might have been taken more seriously if I had noticed the squiggly spell-check underline before I captured the image. :bigear:
... this space intentionally left blank ...
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”