I encourage people to get a machinegun as NFA item too. They are really fun. You won't be able to obtain a Glock 18 (full auto Glock 17) though because they were all manufactured after 1986. No full-auto that was not registered before May 19, 1986 may be transferred to an individual, only government agencies.Baytown wrote:There is really not that much paperwork that goes with it if you ever wanted to do it. If for nothing else, it is just fun to have some NFA stuff. (No, the feds can't come search your house without a warrant, etc...) I have often thought about the law in the same way with a machine gun instead of an AOW though. Glock 18 with a forgrip? PAWS Sterling? MP5k?
Concealed AOW by CHL past 30.06/blue TABC sign?
Moderator: carlson1
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 5073
- Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 1:04 am
- Location: DFW Area, TX
Re: Concealed AOW by CHL past 30.06/blue TABC sign?
4/13/1996 Completed CHL Class, 4/16/1996 Fingerprints, Affidavits, and Application Mailed, 10/4/1996 Received CHL, renewed 1998, 2002, 2006, 2011, 2016...). "ATF... Uhhh...heh...heh....Alcohol, tobacco, and GUNS!! Cool!!!!"
Re: Concealed AOW by CHL past 30.06/blue TABC sign?
Imagine the ACLU hysterics if there was a $200 transfer tax (and fingerprints and police chief signature) to buy a Koran.ScottDLS wrote:I encourage people to get a machinegun as NFA item too. They are really fun. You won't be able to obtain a Glock 18 (full auto Glock 17) though because they were all manufactured after 1986. No full-auto that was not registered before May 19, 1986 may be transferred to an individual, only government agencies.
Now imagine if, even after jumping through the hoops, you couldn't buy a Koran printed after May 19, 1986.
Re: Concealed AOW by CHL past 30.06/blue TABC sign?
OUCH; pretty good analogy regarding 1st+2nd amendmentsTamie wrote:Imagine the ACLU hysterics if there was a $200 transfer tax (and fingerprints and police chief signature) to buy a Koran.ScottDLS wrote:I encourage people to get a machinegun as NFA item too. They are really fun. You won't be able to obtain a Glock 18 (full auto Glock 17) though because they were all manufactured after 1986. No full-auto that was not registered before May 19, 1986 may be transferred to an individual, only government agencies.
Now imagine if, even after jumping through the hoops, you couldn't buy a Koran printed after May 19, 1986.
I'm no lawyer
"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"
"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"
Re: Concealed AOW by CHL past 30.06/blue TABC sign?
That is a good question.
When I transfer NFA weapons to a corp, llc, trust, etc, I still have the person picking the gun up fill out a 4473 and just check the NFA section at the bottom.
When I transfer NFA weapons to a corp, llc, trust, etc, I still have the person picking the gun up fill out a 4473 and just check the NFA section at the bottom.
Winners never quit, and quitters never win; but, if you never win, and never quit, you're a moron.
Re: Concealed AOW by CHL past 30.06/blue TABC sign?
Scott, that is not entirely correct. Class 2's and 3's can own them as well, as long as they have a demo letter.
Winners never quit, and quitters never win; but, if you never win, and never quit, you're a moron.
-
- Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 145
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 2:58 pm
Re: Concealed AOW by CHL past 30.06/blue TABC sign?
In that situation they're being transferred to the business, not to an individual.Baytown wrote:Scott, that is not entirely correct. Class 2's and 3's can own them as well, as long as they have a demo letter.
Re: Concealed AOW by CHL past 30.06/blue TABC sign?
Intresting Thought . . . can anyone help with pros/cons to this approach ?PappaGun wrote: but I am wondering out loud if there is any advantage to purchasing every day firearms through a trust or corporation.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 6:53 pm
Re: Concealed AOW by CHL past 30.06/blue TABC sign?
Unless you're concerned about being sued and want to shelter the assets, or the firearms are worth enough to trigger the estate tax when you die, I don't know any advantage to having a trust own non-NFA firearms, but IANAL.Randy797 wrote:Intresting Thought . . . can anyone help with pros/cons to this approach ?PappaGun wrote: but I am wondering out loud if there is any advantage to purchasing every day firearms through a trust or corporation.
If you run a shooting range or some other gun business, there may be liability or other advantages to the corporation owning the firearms, and for example customers rent the company's firearms to shoot at the range.
This will only hurt a little. What comes next, more so.
Re: Concealed AOW by CHL past 30.06/blue TABC sign?
I still don't get how those items are given to heirs, and if it's easier from a trust, which wants my brother to maintain them in good working condition after I can't any more, (unless he, as trustee, sells for his daughter's college fund (beneficiary) etc etc and said trust self-terminates with no corpus) than an individual who already passed away.juggernaut wrote:In that situation they're being transferred to the business, not to an individual.Baytown wrote:Scott, that is not entirely correct. Class 2's and 3's can own them as well, as long as they have a demo letter.
Especially if one intends to avoid probate, if that matters..
I'd heard it was easier through a trust.
I mean otherwise, brother can't just take and possess deceased person's federal NFA/AOW items until paperwork is done, meanwhile they are in Limbo? Who keeps them?
Anyone know?
I'm no lawyer
"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"
"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"
Re: Concealed AOW by CHL past 30.06/blue TABC sign?
A trust should name a successor trustee, regardless of whether the trust owns firearms or family land or anything else.
A corporation would offer similar unbroken ownership, even if officers, employees, and shareholders change. For example, Coca-Cola maintains ownership of its IP and fixed assets through stock sales, new management, etc.
An heir would typically fill out a Form 5 but you raise a good question about possession during the waiting period.
Disclaimers: I'm not your lawyer; this is not legal advice; the Emperor isn't wearing any clothes.
A corporation would offer similar unbroken ownership, even if officers, employees, and shareholders change. For example, Coca-Cola maintains ownership of its IP and fixed assets through stock sales, new management, etc.
An heir would typically fill out a Form 5 but you raise a good question about possession during the waiting period.
Disclaimers: I'm not your lawyer; this is not legal advice; the Emperor isn't wearing any clothes.