Two digital camera reviews

Most of us are not "computer people" so post your technical questions and comments here. If you have computer or Internet expertise, share it here.

Moderators: carlson1, Keith B

Post Reply
User avatar

WildBill
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 17350
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Two digital camera recommendations

#1

Post by WildBill »

Russell - Congratulations on your newly minted degree. :anamatedbanana
And thanks for your camera review. I am surprised, as Nikon usually makes good products.
NRA Endowment Member

Kalrog
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1886
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Leander, TX
Contact:

Re: Two digital camera reviews

#2

Post by Kalrog »

I'll put out my brief plug for this camera review site: http://www.dpreview.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

GREAT site - maybe too much information there unless you know what you are reading. And I do some professional photography as a side business - so if you need prints or advice I can help. Or even if you just need me to explain what all those numbers mean, I can do that as well (mostly). Although I do use a dSLR now and wouldn't want to go back to a P&S camera, they can take good pictures as well.
User avatar

A-R
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5776
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 5:01 pm
Location: Austin area

Re: Two digital camera recommendations

#3

Post by A-R »

WildBill wrote:Russell - Congratulations on your newly minted degree. :anamatedbanana
And thanks for your camera review. I am surprised, as Nikon usually makes good products.
I am a die-hard Nikon man - semi-pro for about 4 years - and own 6 Nikon cameras (3 DSLRs, 3 film SLRs) and even I am highly disappointed in Nikon's offerings in the point-n-shoot category of digital cameras. Canon blows Nikon away in P-n-S digicams - in addition to my big, heavy professional Nikon DSLRs we also own 2 Canon P-n-S cameras.

For those who don't know photography or cameras, a "Nikon man" admitting that a Canon product is worthwhile is like a Chevy man saying something nice about Ford, a Coke drinker praising Pepsi, a Bud drinker praising Miller, a 1911 fanatic praising a Glock, etc.

:cheers2:
User avatar

nitrogen
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2322
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 1:15 pm
Location: Sachse, TX
Contact:

Re: Two digital camera recommendations

#4

Post by nitrogen »

austinrealtor wrote:
WildBill wrote:Russell - Congratulations on your newly minted degree. :anamatedbanana
And thanks for your camera review. I am surprised, as Nikon usually makes good products.
I am a die-hard Nikon man - semi-pro for about 4 years - and own 6 Nikon cameras (3 DSLRs, 3 film SLRs) and even I am highly disappointed in Nikon's offerings in the point-n-shoot category of digital cameras. Canon blows Nikon away in P-n-S digicams - in addition to my big, heavy professional Nikon DSLRs we also own 2 Canon P-n-S cameras.

For those who don't know photography or cameras, a "Nikon man" admitting that a Canon product is worthwhile is like a Chevy man saying something nice about Ford, a Coke drinker praising Pepsi, a Bud drinker praising Miller, a 1911 fanatic praising a Glock, etc.

:cheers2:
I have to agree about Nikon's point and shoot cameras. You know who has shown the most improvement in point and shoot lately? Sony!

Back in 2001, I bought a cybershot and hated it. There was so much red channel noise in it, it was almost unusable. I tried again this year, and their camera is sooo much better!
.השואה... לעולם לא עוד
Holocaust... Never Again.
Some people create their own storms and get upset when it rains.
--anonymous
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 26866
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Two digital camera reviews

#5

Post by The Annoyed Man »

My first "real" digital camera was a Nikon - a Coolpix 800, I think. What I remember most about it was that it crapped out on me in France, 1 week into a 3 week vacation, in the middle of a day spent touring the oldest Romanesque churches in the Charentes region. I can't think of a worst possible time for it to happen. The CCD chip blew out. I had to drop about $400 unplanned dollars (high because of the Euro/$$ exchange rate) for a Minolta - which is what the nearest store that sold digital cameras carried - so that I could get pictures of the rest of the trip. I was not impressed.

Today, I use a nice little Canon. Takes great pics.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar

TexasComputerDude
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 964
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 4:47 pm
Location: Lufkin, TX
Contact:

Re: Two digital camera reviews

#6

Post by TexasComputerDude »

The Annoyed Man wrote:My first "real" digital camera was a Nikon - a Coolpix 800, I think. What I remember most about it was that it crapped out on me in France, 1 week into a 3 week vacation, in the middle of a day spent touring the oldest Romanesque churches in the Charentes region. I can't think of a worst possible time for it to happen. The CCD chip blew out. I had to drop about $400 unplanned dollars (high because of the Euro/$$ exchange rate) for a Minolta - which is what the nearest store that sold digital cameras carried - so that I could get pictures of the rest of the trip. I was not impressed.

Today, I use a nice little Canon. Takes great pics.

they don't sell disposable camera's overseas? I would have just bought one and used my handy dandy scanner when I got home lol.
Glock 30 - main ccw
User avatar

flintknapper
Banned
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 4962
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 8:40 pm
Location: Deep East Texas

Re: Two digital camera reviews

#7

Post by flintknapper »

I've been very pleased with my Canon S5IS.
Spartans ask not how many, but where!
User avatar

boomerang
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2629
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 11:06 pm
Contact:

Re: Two digital camera reviews

#8

Post by boomerang »

TexasComputerDude wrote:they don't sell disposable camera's overseas? I would have just bought one and used my handy dandy scanner when I got home lol.
The optics in a $5 single use camera are not great. Having said that, for a few bucks, Target (and other places) will burn a CD with the digital images when they develop the film. Fine for family snapshots.
"Ees gun! Ees not safe!"
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 26866
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Two digital camera reviews

#9

Post by The Annoyed Man »

TexasComputerDude wrote:they don't sell disposable camera's overseas? I would have just bought one and used my handy dandy scanner when I got home lol.
They do, but the quality of the disposables' image isn't nearly as good, and then scanning them removes the image one generation from the source. And I took HUNDREDS more pictures, not just 24 or 36 more. I considered it, but rejected it partly for the image quality reason, and partly because I figured that the total cost of purchasing multiple throwaway cameras and getting the film processed and printed would be a big chunk of the price of a new digital camera, and I was going to need a new digital anyway. That Minolta served me well for several years afterward. I eventually gave it to my son.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar

TexasComputerDude
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 964
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 4:47 pm
Location: Lufkin, TX
Contact:

Re: Two digital camera reviews

#10

Post by TexasComputerDude »

lol i've just always been really picky about what i buy, my last laptop took me 2 months to make a decision lol.
Glock 30 - main ccw
Post Reply

Return to “Technical Tips, Questions & Discussions (Computers & Internet)”