Nesbitt (Morris) v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers!

What's going on in Washington, D.C.?

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

Topic author
ELB
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 16
Posts: 8128
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 9:34 pm
Location: Seguin

Re: Nesbitt (Morris) v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers!

#46

Post by ELB »

Did some more poking around the government sites for rule-making stuff. The Federal Register posts list of proposed rules, adopted rules, and notices that are published by the various agencies. For an adopted rule to become effective it must be published in the Federal Register 30 days prior to its adoption. The index for DoD rules (which the USACE falls under) still lists the subject rule as a proposed rule, not a (adopted or final) rule.

https://www.federalregister.gov/index/2 ... posed-rule
USAF 1982-2005
____________

s3779m
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 8
Posts: 39
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2012 3:30 pm

Re: Nesbitt (Morris) v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers!

#47

Post by s3779m »

ELB wrote: Thu Dec 10, 2020 1:43 pm Did some more poking around the government sites for rule-making stuff. The Federal Register posts list of proposed rules, adopted rules, and notices that are published by the various agencies. For an adopted rule to become effective it must be published in the Federal Register 30 days prior to its adoption. The index for DoD rules (which the USACE falls under) still lists the subject rule as a proposed rule, not a (adopted or final) rule.

https://www.federalregister.gov/index/2 ... posed-rule
Disappointing to say the least. Too bad those in charge do not read the constitution or the bill of rights.

s3779m
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 8
Posts: 39
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2012 3:30 pm

Re: Nesbitt (Morris) v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers!

#48

Post by s3779m »

ELB wrote: Thu Dec 10, 2020 1:43 pm Did some more poking around the government sites for rule-making stuff. The Federal Register posts list of proposed rules, adopted rules, and notices that are published by the various agencies. For an adopted rule to become effective it must be published in the Federal Register 30 days prior to its adoption. The index for DoD rules (which the USACE falls under) still lists the subject rule as a proposed rule, not a (adopted or final) rule.

https://www.federalregister.gov/index/2 ... posed-rule
Disappointing to say the least. Too bad those in charge do not read the constitution or the bill of rights.
User avatar

oljames3
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 5356
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2014 1:21 pm
Location: Bastrop, Texas
Contact:

Re: Nesbitt (Morris) v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers!

#49

Post by oljames3 »

NRA ILA is hosting a webinar today. Started at 0830 Central. They say the ACOE proposed rule ...
Would amend 36 C.F.R. § 327.13 to read:
* An individual may possess or transport a weapon
[including ”any firearm”] on any project provided
that ... The individual is not otherwise prohibited
by Federal, state, or local law from possessing or
transporting such weapon; and ... The possession
or transportation of such weapon is in compliance
with applicable Federal, state, and local law.

* Comment period ended June 12, 2020
* Final action due Feb. 2020 (per Unified Agenda)
https://shared.nrapvf.org/sharedmedia/1 ... 13ed12.pdf
O. Lee James, III Captain, US Army (Retired 2012), Honorable Order of St. Barbara
Safety Ministry Director, First Baptist Church Elgin
NRA, NRA Basic Pistol Shooting Instructor, Rangemaster Certified, GOA, TSRA, NAR L1

s3779m
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 8
Posts: 39
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2012 3:30 pm

Re: Nesbitt (Morris) v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers!

#50

Post by s3779m »

oljames3 wrote: Fri Dec 11, 2020 10:01 am NRA ILA is hosting a webinar today. Started at 0830 Central. They say the ACOE proposed rule ...
Would amend 36 C.F.R. § 327.13 to read:
* An individual may possess or transport a weapon
[including ”any firearm”] on any project provided
that ... The individual is not otherwise prohibited
by Federal, state, or local law from possessing or
transporting such weapon; and ... The possession
or transportation of such weapon is in compliance
with applicable Federal, state, and local law.

* Comment period ended June 12, 2020
* Final action due Feb. 2020 (per Unified Agenda)
https://shared.nrapvf.org/sharedmedia/1 ... 13ed12.pdf
Wonder if the bottom line, "final action" has the wrong date and should be Feb. 2021? If so, we might see improvement by this summer.

s3779m
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 8
Posts: 39
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2012 3:30 pm

Re: Nesbitt (Morris) v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers!

#51

Post by s3779m »

oljames3 wrote: Fri Dec 11, 2020 10:01 am NRA ILA is hosting a webinar today. Started at 0830 Central. They say the ACOE proposed rule ...
Would amend 36 C.F.R. § 327.13 to read:
* An individual may possess or transport a weapon
[including ”any firearm”] on any project provided
that ... The individual is not otherwise prohibited
by Federal, state, or local law from possessing or
transporting such weapon; and ... The possession
or transportation of such weapon is in compliance
with applicable Federal, state, and local law.

* Comment period ended June 12, 2020
* Final action due Feb. 2020 (per Unified Agenda)
https://shared.nrapvf.org/sharedmedia/1 ... 13ed12.pdf
Wonder if the bottom line, "final action" has the wrong date and should be Feb. 2021? If so, we might see improvement by this summer.
User avatar

oljames3
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 5356
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2014 1:21 pm
Location: Bastrop, Texas
Contact:

Re: Nesbitt (Morris) v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers!

#52

Post by oljames3 »

s3779m wrote: Fri Dec 11, 2020 10:51 am
oljames3 wrote: Fri Dec 11, 2020 10:01 am NRA ILA is hosting a webinar today. Started at 0830 Central. They say the ACOE proposed rule ...
Would amend 36 C.F.R. § 327.13 to read:
* An individual may possess or transport a weapon
[including ”any firearm”] on any project provided
that ... The individual is not otherwise prohibited
by Federal, state, or local law from possessing or
transporting such weapon; and ... The possession
or transportation of such weapon is in compliance
with applicable Federal, state, and local law.

* Comment period ended June 12, 2020
* Final action due Feb. 2020 (per Unified Agenda)
https://shared.nrapvf.org/sharedmedia/1 ... 13ed12.pdf
Wonder if the bottom line, "final action" has the wrong date and should be Feb. 2021? If so, we might see improvement by this summer.
Yes, NRA ILA said it is a typo and should have been 2021.
O. Lee James, III Captain, US Army (Retired 2012), Honorable Order of St. Barbara
Safety Ministry Director, First Baptist Church Elgin
NRA, NRA Basic Pistol Shooting Instructor, Rangemaster Certified, GOA, TSRA, NAR L1
Post Reply

Return to “Federal”