Keith B wrote:OK, now it passes.AEA wrote:Edited my post......Keith B wrote:Not really gun related either.
How's that?

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
Keith B wrote:OK, now it passes.AEA wrote:Edited my post......Keith B wrote:Not really gun related either.
How's that?
If memory serves me correct newt's indiscretions were at the same time of Clintons impeachment proceedings where he was pushing harder than anyone, so while Democrats may have redefined scandalous the Republicans have redefined hypocrisy and continue to do so(i.e. pro-lifers who support the death penalty etc etc etc)Rex B wrote:That was long ago, before Clinton and Team and set the bar much lower.Dave2 wrote:Bummer?
(Really, I'm asking. All I know about him is that he left the Republican party in a scandal that was big enough to make him resign then, but apparently isn't anything important now.)
The Democrats have redefined "Scandalous"
Thread hijacking....loadedliberal wrote:(i.e. pro-lifers who support the death penalty etc etc etc)
Nobody ever wants to talk to the PAN, even though it's the PAN that makes delicious omlettes. Poor, lonely PAN...Oldgringo wrote:POT meet KETTLE, KETTLE meet POT.
Yeah, there is very big speculation that this may be part of it. Apparently there are some close ties back to Perry from several Newt's now former staffers.10Shooter wrote:M2K wrote:I would guess the former Rick Perry campaign organizers are thinking about rejoining Ricky's team.