Well, the fact is that this DOES happen in this day and age. Try Googling "gun", "intruder" & "at bay" and you'll find quite a few news stories describing such incidents.TDDude wrote:I don't see this happening in this day and age.DParker wrote:The scenario I propose did not assume that the BG was IN your home. Merely either on your property or in some other situation that makes your possession and use of the firearm legal. It *did* assume, however, that things have played out in such a way that the BG did not challenge you once your weapon was brought to bear (leaving you with no reason to shoot), nor did he try to flee the scene.
But I both follow and largely agree with most of the rest of what you said.
Since there's the possibility that it was someone else who called the police I have no way of knowing what they've been informed of. Hence my extra concern for their uncertainty upon arrival.Liko81 wrote:You're exactly right, but that's why they're police officers; they train regularly in "shoot/don't shoot" situations. The LEO can never be certain of anything; that's why cops will say ordinary everyday traffic stops are the most dangerous thing a cop does. However, knowing that the homeowner is armed and holding the BG at bay leads the LEO to expect that situation when he shows up.
That's all fine and what I would expect, as my purpose for posing this hypothetical was not to find out how to avoid being temporarily cuffed at the scene. It was to avoid being shot or otherwise wounded.Having encountered this situation, the officer will draw and order the BG to the ground. If at that point you are still holding your weapon, the officer will ask you to lower it. He'll cuff the BG, then ask for your weapon. He's just controlling the scene. If you haven't done anything threatening to him or the BG, you may be left uncuffed, but it's possible that the officer will cuff you as well until the whole thing is sorted out.
I believe the axiom here is, "Don't draw unless you're prepared to shoot." Not, "If you draw then you should automatically shoot." There are many reasons and situations that might merit drawing as a defensive precaution, but not automatically require shooting.Legally speaking, drawing on a BG is use of force. Firing is of course use of deadly force. However, from a practical standpoint, if you are afraid for your life or safety, those of someone close to you, or of your possessions, draw and fire. Drawing on an invading BG by itself isn't always a deterrent, and by the time you figure out it isn't you could be dead.