Motorist Protection Act

The "What Works, What Doesn't," "Recommendations & Experiences"

Moderators: carlson1, Crossfire

User avatar

USA1
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 7412
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 5:37 pm
Location: Tomball ,Texas
Contact:

Re: Motorist Protection Act

#16

Post by USA1 »

redoregon wrote:
dicion wrote:
USA1 wrote:
joe817 wrote:
This is the exact booklet that was passed out to my class a few weeks ago. As I had time, I read it from cover to cover 3 times before I took the class. And it helped.
that book is OK , but i'm waitin for the movie . :mrgreen:
We can film it at your house.

I'll bring the airsoft pistols, and we can act out various scenes that are within, or not within compliance of the law, and show them in the video "rlol" :smilelol5:
All joking aside, something like this would be REALLY USEFUL to guys like me, with a foreign-born spouse to whom English is a second language... legalese kicks her booty and *seeing* situtations from the book would *really* help her to understand what they're saying!
:iagree: i'm a very visual person .
some folks might fall asleep watching something like that , but i would soak it up .

might even watch it twice :cool:
Glock Armorer - S&W M&P Armorer

mred
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 79
Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 5:43 pm

Re: Motorist Protection Act

#17

Post by mred »

If someone carring under MPA was involved in a shooting would they have the same immunity as a CHL holder reguarding civil suits?

dicion
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 2099
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 9:19 pm
Location: Houston Northwest

Re: Motorist Protection Act

#18

Post by dicion »

mred wrote:If someone carring under MPA was involved in a shooting would they have the same immunity as a CHL holder reguarding civil suits?
Yes, the current immunity is not for CHL holders, but, rather for justified use of deadly force. No matter who uses it.

If deadly force is justified, and you use it, and the person dies, it doesnt matter where you are. Grocery store, Car, Your house, Grandma's house, neighbor's house etc.
User avatar

boomerang
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2629
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 11:06 pm
Contact:

Re: Motorist Protection Act

#19

Post by boomerang »

mred wrote:If someone carring under MPA was involved in a shooting would they have the same immunity as a CHL holder reguarding civil suits?
There's no mention of CHL in the law. http://tlo2.tlc.state.tx.us/statutes/do ... 083.00.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
"Ees gun! Ees not safe!"
User avatar

C-dub
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 13562
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 7:18 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Motorist Protection Act

#20

Post by C-dub »

That's interesting. I hadn't thought about it applying to places other than my home or car.
I am not and have never been a LEO. My avatar is in honor of my friend, Dallas Police Sargent Michael Smith, who was murdered along with four other officers in Dallas on 7.7.2016.
NRA Patriot-Endowment Lifetime Member---------------------------------------------Si vis pacem, para bellum.................................................Patriot Guard Rider
User avatar

Dexdahex
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 247
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 4:07 am
Location: Harris County Cypress Texas

Re: Motorist Protection Act

#21

Post by Dexdahex »

tarkus wrote:I'm not a lawyer. The short version is you can carry in your car if it's concealed and you're not a criminal.

Here's the actual law.
Sec. 46.02. UNLAWFUL CARRYING WEAPONS. (a) A person commits an offense if the person intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly carries on or about his or her person a handgun, illegal knife, or club if the person is not:
(1) on the person's own premises or premises under the person's control; or

(2) inside of or directly en route to a motor vehicle that is owned by the person or under the person's control.

(a-1) A person commits an offense if the person intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly carries on or about his or her person a handgun in a motor vehicle that is owned by the person or under the person's control at any time in which:
(1) the handgun is in plain view; or

(2) the person is:
(A) engaged in criminal activity, other than a Class C misdemeanor that is a violation of a law or ordinance regulating traffic;
(B) prohibited by law from possessing a firearm; or
(C) a member of a criminal street gang, as defined by Section 71.01.


(a-2) For purposes of this section, "premises" includes real property and a recreational vehicle that is being used as living quarters, regardless of whether that use is temporary or permanent. In this subsection, "recreational vehicle" means a motor vehicle primarily designed as temporary living quarters or a vehicle that contains temporary living quarters and is designed to be towed by a motor vehicle. The term includes a travel trailer, camping trailer, truck camper, motor home, and horse trailer with living quarters.

(b) Except as provided by Subsection (c), an offense under this section is a Class A misdemeanor.

(c) An offense under this section is a felony of the third degree if the offense is committed on any premises licensed or issued a permit by this state for the sale of alcoholic beverages.
:iagree:
"Every Citizen Shall Have The Right To Keep And Bear Arms In The Lawful Defense Of Himself Or The State"

CHL Holder
NRA Member

Fabrique Nationale Herstal (FNH) FN-40
User avatar

Harley rider 55
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:27 pm

Re: Motorist Protection Act

#22

Post by Harley rider 55 »

I legally carried a gun in a holster under the traveler's exemption years before CHL's were issued.
Sig P220
Sig P239 .357SIG
Springfield Champion
S&W 442
Bauer .25
Post Reply

Return to “New to CHL?”