I originally took my course two years ago. I put off doing the paperwork though, since I didn't have a gun (and also because I'm a semi-professional procrastinator). Wife got me a Glock 23 Gen 4 as a belated Christmas present last month, and I discovered I was barely under the time limit to turn in my paperwork (course date was April 6). Filled it all out and mailed it all in on the 13th of last month.
In the meantime, since carrying on your vehicle is legal (including the motorcycle I ride to work every day), I started carrying when I ride the bike and the few times I drive our truck. The truck was no problem. When I went someplace, I'd simply slip the gun and holster off my waistband, slide it under the seat, and lock the door.
The bike was a little more of a challenge. I have saddlebags that lock, but they're not much of a lock. Not near enough to trust a $600 weapon that I'd hate to fall into the wrong hands. Add to that the challenge of figuring out how to transfer from my waist to the saddlebags in view of everyone, and that made carrying anywhere but work and back out of the question on the bike.
Work was OK though. I work on a federal facility that has a small parking area behind a monitored gate. Plus the parking area is right in front of the security guards (armed), and the entire outside (and much of the inside) is video monitored 24x7. I asked and was told it was OK to bring a weapon into the parking lot, but of course the building itself of off-limits. So for the most part work was good. However, it did mean I couldn't stop on the way (there or back) and grab something in a convenience store. Plus when I knew I was going to my grandson's football practice on the way home, I'd have to not carry that day. But overall, carrying under MPA gave me a bit of "pre-CHL" experience.
Last Saturday, my status changed on the web site to "mailed", so all week long I've been anticipating getting my plastic. We had plans for a birthday party at a resturant right after I got off work yesterday (Friday), but the wife and I were meeting at the house first and going from there. As soon as I walked in the door, she said "Hmmmm, this looks like it's for you" and handed me the envelope from DPS.
You'd figure with all the hassle, money, and waiting, there'd at least be a letter or something. Nope, just the piece of plastic lodged into a piece of thick paper. Not a big deal though, I probably wouldn't have bothered reading a letter anyway. Off we went to the resturant.
No "Wally Walk", but it did feel a bit odd, in a satisfying way, to not slide the Glock under the seat - just opened the door, and walked in the resturant, gun tucked in the holster under my waistband and shirt.
Like I had a right to do so. ;)
"More" Legal - Finally
Moderators: carlson1, Crossfire
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 795
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 1:23 pm
-
- Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 70
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 8:14 pm
- Location: Sulphur Springs , Texas
Re: "More" Legal - Finally
Good for You . I just recieved mine Thursday and , I thought the same thing You did when I opened the envelope . You would think they could even have some sort of generic , computer generated form letter , signed by some non descript person saying simply , Good job Citizen .
SA XD .45 Tactical OD green
Ruger LCP
CHL since 4/12/2012
Ruger LCP
CHL since 4/12/2012
-
- Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 185
- Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2009 2:15 pm
- Location: Plano, TX
Re: "More" Legal - Finally
Please understand it is not legal to carry in a federal building, even if you have your CHL.
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 795
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 1:23 pm
Re: "More" Legal - Finally
Yes, I understand that. I thought I was pretty clear:fannypacker wrote:Please understand it is not legal to carry in a federal building, even if you have your CHL.
ScooterSissy wrote:...
I asked and was told it was OK to bring a weapon into the parking lot, but of course the building itself of off-limits. So for the most part work was good...
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 1047
- Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 11:25 pm
Re: "More" Legal - Finally
No sweat Sissy. You will always find someone who wants to clarify the point you already made clear. It is what makes us such a bunch of loveable lunkheads. I just sigh and move on.
RJ
RJ
CHL Received 5/16/11
Proud Member NRA
Proud Member Texas Concealed Handgun Association
Proud Member Second Amendment Foundation
Proud Member of The Truth Squad founded by Tom Gresham. "A lie left unchallenged becomes the truth"
Proud Member NRA
Proud Member Texas Concealed Handgun Association
Proud Member Second Amendment Foundation
Proud Member of The Truth Squad founded by Tom Gresham. "A lie left unchallenged becomes the truth"
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 795
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 1:23 pm
Re: "More" Legal - Finally
To be fair, after I posted my response, I considered deleting it. It occurred to me that he may have thought I believed that after getting my CHL, I was no longer constrained from carrying in the building (the scenario I mentioned was before getting plastic in hand). I knew though.johnson0317 wrote:No sweat Sissy. You will always find someone who wants to clarify the point you already made clear. It is what makes us such a bunch of loveable lunkheads. I just sigh and move on.
RJ
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 3798
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 7:36 am
- Location: CenTex
Re: "More" Legal - Finally
I'll say this: You'd be surprised how many people we get posting on here that don't know simple things like no carry in federal buildings, church carry being legal, etc that should have been covered in CHL classes.
I think people who have been here a while and have seen the same questions come up over and over again have a tendency to spell things out for those who may lurk or not post, so there is no confusion regarding the law (I myself am guilty of this).
I doubt it was so much directed at the OP as a blanket statement for anyone reading the thread that might have gotten confused.
That's how I'd take it anyway. No harm, no foul and congrats on getting your application in finally.
I think people who have been here a while and have seen the same questions come up over and over again have a tendency to spell things out for those who may lurk or not post, so there is no confusion regarding the law (I myself am guilty of this).
I doubt it was so much directed at the OP as a blanket statement for anyone reading the thread that might have gotten confused.
That's how I'd take it anyway. No harm, no foul and congrats on getting your application in finally.

TANSTAAFL