Your welcome to your opinion, but it meets the definition of a belt, strap, restraint etc. etc. the state did not say waist and the state did not define belt.mojo84 wrote:I disagree with your opinion regarding ankle holsters. Those have been discussed and the general consensus is those are not what the legislature intended as a belt is intended to go around one's waist.twomillenium wrote:IANAL and IMNSHO, it would be a shoulder holster and an ankle holster that "belts" around the leg would be a legal for OC as well.
The state does not have it's own unique definition of a shoulder holster. I think the fact that it uses the should as one of its' supports would make it a legal shoulder holster. An ankle holster with a belt that goes around the leg would be legal as well. The state says "belt" holster not "waist" holster. I have no need at this time to OC so I will let someone who has that burning desire be the test case.
But then I would wonder why one would want to openly wear an ankle belt holster. That would really say "Hey, look at me!!".