

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
Wouldn't it still cost you your life savings to defend yourself in court, even if you did the right thing?dac1842 wrote:One poster asked what would have happend had a CHL been nearby and shot the BG? The police would have bought you a steak dinner. Remember the use of deadly force is authorized in defense of third person when that person's life is in immenent danger.
FIRST customer right here! When and where do we meet? I'm serious.It would be neat if an advanced course on survival techinques were offered to CHL holders. hmmm perhaps a business idea>??! Anyway, the short message to long one, stay alert!
there is is high probability of that happening.Wouldn't it still cost you your life savings to defend yourself in court, even if you did the right thing?
Because they are afraid. They keep reading about it in the gun magazines and they keep hearing stories in the media about people getting sued for all kinds of stupid things.seamusTX wrote:I don't know why people keep saying this.
Same here - though she's not as stridently anti as you've described yours to be. This kind of thing happening makes me want to show her and say, "See? See? It could happen anywhere, to anyone, at any time." but that would just turn her off even more.Armed-Texan wrote:tragedies like this are why i wish my wife would be more accepting of firearms and get her CHL.
...
i worry sometimes especially when she has my babies out and going shopping and i can't be there.
I guess it depends on what ones lifes savings is. But a good clean justified shooting, most times will never go beyond a grand jury, and it might go a couple thousand.locknload wrote:Wouldn't it still cost you your life savings to defend yourself in court, even if you did the right thing?dac1842 wrote:One poster asked what would have happend had a CHL been nearby and shot the BG? The police would have bought you a steak dinner. Remember the use of deadly force is authorized in defense of third person when that person's life is in immenent danger.
Armed-Texan wrote:tragedies like this are why i wish my wife would be more accepting of firearms and get her CHL. she is very anti-guns(maybe her only flaw) she hates the idea that i am getting mine and i am not even allowed to talk about guns
. i bought her some pepper spray but when i tried it on myself it really didn't affect me, now i plan to get her some sabre. even with examples as this, the statistics supporting CHL, i can't convince her to at least practice at the range with me. oh well i won't push the issue, it is a personal freedom of course. i worry sometimes especially when she has my babies out and going shopping and i can't be there. shoot i worry sometimes when i am out and about, i stopped at a gas station once with my son and got the sickest feeling about the place and wondered why the heck would i even come in here. we skidaddled PDQ.
Well, you could, but CPS frowns on stuff like that...seamusTX wrote: You can't drop the kid in an emergency.
- Jim
That's certainly a good idea, but a criminal can arrive seemingly out of nowhere very quickly.DoubleJ wrote:I have taken a keen interest in looking in the rearview mirrors before I "deploy" from my "Urban Assault Vehicle."
Good on you for checking around before you exit. Cars with people sitting in them should be noticed as well as others close by. Remember we get to choose our parking spot, so choose carefully.DoubleJ wrote:agreed. but I was looking at it from the perspective that the door somewhat "shields" you from the front, so the back is your more exposed area.
I'll concede the cars parked directly next to you should be evaluated as well. good point.