Employer Car Searches
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 26852
- Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
- Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
- Contact:
Re: Employer Car Searches
I voted "No," but I should amend that to say that my car has never been searched at work unless I forgot my reading glasses in it, or something like that. My place of work is maybe 25 ft from my place of sleep, and my car is parked right outside my "office" door.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”
― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"
#TINVOWOOT
― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"
#TINVOWOOT
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 276
- Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 11:58 am
- Location: League City, TX
Re: Employer Car Searches
I've had my car searched going into a NASA facility, which has a codified prohibition against firearms. The search was not random, they had a specific threat that they were searching for.
The were searching the engine compartments of all white trucks entering the facility. They did not search the cab of the truck, or even the covered bed for that matter.
The were searching the engine compartments of all white trucks entering the facility. They did not search the cab of the truck, or even the covered bed for that matter.
IANAL, what I write should not be taken as Legal Advice.
"Why I may disagree with what you say, I’ll fight to the death your right to say it."
"Why I may disagree with what you say, I’ll fight to the death your right to say it."
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 755
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 10:45 pm
- Location: Houston Texas Area
Re: Employer Car Searches
I found out recently that I can leave my weapon in the vehicle in the parking garage at work. I just can't carry into the building. Well, better than...
Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes... (Jefferson quoting Beccaria)
... tyrants accomplish their purposes ...by disarming the people, and making it an offense to keep arms. - Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story, 1840
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 5:48 pm
- Location: NW Houston, TX
Re: Employer Car Searches
No and if they searched me and found one I'd just say nobody ever told me I couldn't. Which they haven't. I seriously doubt they will ever search though.C-dub wrote:But have you ever signed anything that said you've read the employee handbook or your company's policies or been given a handbook that has this policy in it? Maybe no one has shown that specific page, but they didn't really have to if you've been given the book.
My posts on this website are worth every cent you paid me for them.
Re: Employer Car Searches
Unless it's 30.06 wording, it doesn't matter, legally speaking. Oral notice isn't worth the paper it's written on.C-dub wrote:But have you ever signed anything that said you've read the employee handbook or your company's policies or been given a handbook that has this policy in it? Maybe no one has shown that specific page, but they didn't really have to if you've been given the book.gregthehand wrote: I just did a search of our internal site and we do in-fact have a policy but nobody has ever shown it to me.
When it comes to firing, it doesn't matter if you signed for receipt of a valid 30.06 notice, or if there's no policy at all. Fired is fired.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 5
- Posts: 5073
- Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 1:04 am
- Location: DFW Area, TX
Re: Employer Car Searches
Oral notice is valid and does not require any specific wording. That's why I follow the "Don't ask, don't tell rule", so I don't inadvertently receive oral notice.chabouk wrote: Unless it's 30.06 wording, it doesn't matter, legally speaking. Oral notice isn't worth the paper it's written on.
When it comes to firing, it doesn't matter if you signed for receipt of a valid 30.06 notice, or if there's no policy at all. Fired is fired.
4/13/1996 Completed CHL Class, 4/16/1996 Fingerprints, Affidavits, and Application Mailed, 10/4/1996 Received CHL, renewed 1998, 2002, 2006, 2011, 2016...). "ATF... Uhhh...heh...heh....Alcohol, tobacco, and GUNS!! Cool!!!!"
-
- Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 3:56 pm
- Location: Ft Worth Texas
Re: Employer Car Searches
My "commute" is 9 hours one way and through some interesting areas. My personal safety trumps company policy. I haven't bee searched and will not submit to one unless presented with a warrant.
Carl
Carl
03/Oct 09- Class taken
05/Oct 09- Packet Mailed
05 1/2 Oct- Tapping fingers on desk waiting
04/Dec. 09- Plastic came in the Mail.
Primary Dan Wesson Valor
Secondary Kimber Crimson Carry II
Third XDm 9
05/Oct 09- Packet Mailed
05 1/2 Oct- Tapping fingers on desk waiting
04/Dec. 09- Plastic came in the Mail.
Primary Dan Wesson Valor
Secondary Kimber Crimson Carry II
Third XDm 9
-
- Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 133
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:57 am
- Location: Sherman
- Contact:
Re: Employer Car Searches
I work somewhere that doesn't allow "weapons" on the premise. I've recently tried to have management change their ways, but to no avail. Just falls on deaf ears.
I do, however, commute with a gun and keep it in the car. At least, by law, I'm allowed to do that.
I do, however, commute with a gun and keep it in the car. At least, by law, I'm allowed to do that.
XD40 Service in Supertuck
"Self-government won't work without self-discipline." - Paul Harvey
"Self-government won't work without self-discipline." - Paul Harvey
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 5
- Posts: 5073
- Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 1:04 am
- Location: DFW Area, TX
Re: Employer Car Searches
Until you told them and got them to give you ORAL notice, you could have legally carried in the building too. On the other hand, they could have fired you.GhostTX wrote:I work somewhere that doesn't allow "weapons" on the premise. I've recently tried to have management change their ways, but to no avail. Just falls on deaf ears.
I do, however, commute with a gun and keep it in the car. At least, by law, I'm allowed to do that.
4/13/1996 Completed CHL Class, 4/16/1996 Fingerprints, Affidavits, and Application Mailed, 10/4/1996 Received CHL, renewed 1998, 2002, 2006, 2011, 2016...). "ATF... Uhhh...heh...heh....Alcohol, tobacco, and GUNS!! Cool!!!!"
-
- Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 133
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:57 am
- Location: Sherman
- Contact:
Re: Employer Car Searches
No. It's been communicated to me in non-CHL discussions and the policy ("zero-tolerance policy") is posted in several employee notification boards. I don't think I could have pleaded ignorance if I ever was caught.ScottDLS wrote: Until you told them and got them to give you ORAL notice, you could have legally carried in the building too. On the other hand, they could have fired you.
XD40 Service in Supertuck
"Self-government won't work without self-discipline." - Paul Harvey
"Self-government won't work without self-discipline." - Paul Harvey
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 5
- Posts: 5073
- Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 1:04 am
- Location: DFW Area, TX
Re: Employer Car Searches
Fair enough. My company has never given me oral notice, though they have non-30.06 language in handbook. I'm not asking, and hopefully they are not telling!GhostTX wrote:No. It's been communicated to me in non-CHL discussions and the policy ("zero-tolerance policy") is posted in several employee notification boards. I don't think I could have pleaded ignorance if I ever was caught.ScottDLS wrote: Until you told them and got them to give you ORAL notice, you could have legally carried in the building too. On the other hand, they could have fired you.
4/13/1996 Completed CHL Class, 4/16/1996 Fingerprints, Affidavits, and Application Mailed, 10/4/1996 Received CHL, renewed 1998, 2002, 2006, 2011, 2016...). "ATF... Uhhh...heh...heh....Alcohol, tobacco, and GUNS!! Cool!!!!"
Re: Employer Car Searches
And my point is, "Oral notice isn't worth the paper it's written on."ScottDLS wrote:Oral notice is valid and does not require any specific wording. That's why I follow the "Don't ask, don't tell rule", so I don't inadvertently receive oral notice.chabouk wrote: Unless it's 30.06 wording, it doesn't matter, legally speaking. Oral notice isn't worth the paper it's written on.
When it comes to firing, it doesn't matter if you signed for receipt of a valid 30.06 notice, or if there's no policy at all. Fired is fired.
Got a witness?
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 4
- Posts: 17350
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm
- Location: Houston
Re: Employer Car Searches
"They" will probably have a witness. You won't.chabouk wrote:And my point is, "Oral notice isn't worth the paper it's written on."ScottDLS wrote:Oral notice is valid and does not require any specific wording. That's why I follow the "Don't ask, don't tell rule", so I don't inadvertently receive oral notice.chabouk wrote: Unless it's 30.06 wording, it doesn't matter, legally speaking. Oral notice isn't worth the paper it's written on.
When it comes to firing, it doesn't matter if you signed for receipt of a valid 30.06 notice, or if there's no policy at all. Fired is fired.
Got a witness?
NRA Endowment Member
Re: Employer Car Searches
And all those new to CHL or unsure of the law (lol) remember that there is and can be a difference between violating a company policy that can get you fired and violating the law that can get you prosecuted.
I am not and have never been a LEO. My avatar is in honor of my friend, Dallas Police Sargent Michael Smith, who was murdered along with four other officers in Dallas on 7.7.2016.
NRA Patriot-Endowment Lifetime Member---------------------------------------------Si vis pacem, para bellum.................................................Patriot Guard Rider
NRA Patriot-Endowment Lifetime Member---------------------------------------------Si vis pacem, para bellum.................................................Patriot Guard Rider
Re: Employer Car Searches
That's more or less what I'd do if my company tried to conduct a search. I'd leave immediately regardless of what I did or did not have to hide. I don't know that I would consent to a search when I returned, but I suppose I'd eventually have to or else I'd run out of sick days. I might just have to start parking across the street.chabouk wrote:In Derrick A. Wiley v. Department of Justice, a federal employee was suspected of having a pistol in his car, and investigators received a written tip. The investigator requested to search Wiley's car. He declined, said he was taking sick leave, and left the property. A short time later he returned and submitted to a search of his car.