CHLer arrested in improperly posted hospital

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

WildBill
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 11
Posts: 17350
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Houston

Re: CHLer arrested in improperly posted hospital

#106

Post by WildBill »

MedicMan218 wrote:Any word on what happened to the RN's case?
I am also curious, but most of the time we never hear the outcome of such cases. Unless something about the story is sensational, they usually disappear after the original story. There was probably much more discussion on this forum than was ever in the news.
NRA Endowment Member
User avatar

Medic218
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1286
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 3:11 am
Location: DFW

Re: CHLer arrested in improperly posted hospital

#107

Post by Medic218 »

gigag04 wrote:Man that's 2.5 years of resurrecting.
You're welcome! :lol::
"I don't like repeat offenders, I like DEAD offenders!" -- Ted Nugent
"Not everyone can be born with common sense, some are born liberals." -- M218
User avatar

ELB
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 8128
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 9:34 pm
Location: Seguin

Re: CHLer arrested in improperly posted hospital

#108

Post by ELB »

I am curious also.

I googled on this as many ways as I could think of, and didn't even find references to the original event. I suspect it would take someone going through the court records to find out.
USAF 1982-2005
____________

dicion
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2099
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 9:19 pm
Location: Houston Northwest

Re: CHLer arrested in improperly posted hospital

#109

Post by dicion »

I would also like to know.

My bet would be that it was either dropped, or plead out to something lower.

If they were convicted, I think we would have heard about it, as IIRC Charles once mentioning, I think he said that no one has ever been convicted under 30.06.
I could be wrong, however.

jiggerachi
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 48
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 10:15 am

Re: CHLer arrested in improperly posted hospital

#110

Post by jiggerachi »

I'm not sure if its mentioned in this thread or not, didn't read the 8 pages but...

We spent a week in this hospital when my son was born 2 months ago, and this place is now 30.06 posted. Every entrance that I used were posted with correctly sized and worded stickers. Even the adjoining buildings (lactation consultant office) were posted.

They look to be relatively new, less than a year or so old. Might have some relation to this event, or it might just be since Texas Health Recources took over the hospital and remodeled recently.
User avatar

WildBill
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 11
Posts: 17350
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Houston

Re: CHLer arrested in improperly posted hospital

#111

Post by WildBill »

WildBill wrote:
MedicMan218 wrote:Any word on what happened to the RN's case?
I am also curious, but most of the time we never hear the outcome of such cases. Unless something about the story is sensational, they usually disappear after the original story. There was probably much more discussion on this forum than was ever in the news.
I just received an email from the Bedford Police Chief. He stated that the DA declined to prosecute, based on the wording (not being exactly as it states in the statute) of, not only the sign posted outside the building, but also the wording in the hospital employee policy manual.
NRA Endowment Member
User avatar

Charles L. Cotton
Site Admin
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 17787
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
Location: Friendswood, TX
Contact:

Re: CHLer arrested in improperly posted hospital

#112

Post by Charles L. Cotton »

WildBill wrote:
WildBill wrote:
MedicMan218 wrote:Any word on what happened to the RN's case?
I am also curious, but most of the time we never hear the outcome of such cases. Unless something about the story is sensational, they usually disappear after the original story. There was probably much more discussion on this forum than was ever in the news.
I just received an email from the Bedford Police Chief. He stated that the DA declined to prosecute, based on the wording (not being exactly as it states in the statute) of, not only the sign posted outside the building, but also the wording in the hospital employee policy manual.
Thanks for this update. This is very good to hear.

Chas.
User avatar

Charles L. Cotton
Site Admin
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 17787
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
Location: Friendswood, TX
Contact:

Re: CHLer arrested in improperly posted hospital

#113

Post by Charles L. Cotton »

jiggerachi wrote:I'm not sure if its mentioned in this thread or not, didn't read the 8 pages but...

We spent a week in this hospital when my son was born 2 months ago, and this place is now 30.06 posted. Every entrance that I used were posted with correctly sized and worded stickers. Even the adjoining buildings (lactation consultant office) were posted.

They look to be relatively new, less than a year or so old. Might have some relation to this event, or it might just be since Texas Health Recources took over the hospital and remodeled recently.
Based upon the information in Wildbill's update, you can bet the new signs are the result of the DA's correct refusal to prosecute.

Chas.
User avatar

Keith B
Moderator
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 18503
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:29 pm

Re: CHLer arrested in improperly posted hospital

#114

Post by Keith B »

WildBill wrote:
WildBill wrote:
MedicMan218 wrote:Any word on what happened to the RN's case?
I am also curious, but most of the time we never hear the outcome of such cases. Unless something about the story is sensational, they usually disappear after the original story. There was probably much more discussion on this forum than was ever in the news.
I just received an email from the Bedford Police Chief. He stated that the DA declined to prosecute, based on the wording (not being exactly as it states in the statute) of, not only the sign posted outside the building, but also the wording in the hospital employee policy manual.
Glad to hear they followed the letter of the law. However, this whole incident is the reason they are now posted with 30.06 signs. I will be willing to bet the manual now meets 30.06 wording too. :banghead:

And Charle's beat me to posting.
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member

Psalm 82:3-4

MechAg94
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1584
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 10:28 pm

Re: CHLer arrested in improperly posted hospital

#115

Post by MechAg94 »

Dang it, I read through several pages before I realized this was that old. :lol:

Glad to hear she wasn't prosecuted. Sounds like what would happen to me if I carried at work and someone tattled. I would be fired, but likely nothing else.

The only comment I could think of about her behavior is that I think she should have had some way of securing her purse or at least the holster portion to prevent unauthorized access when it was unattended.
User avatar

fickman
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1711
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 2:52 pm
Location: Fort Worth, Texas

Re: CHLer arrested in improperly posted hospital

#116

Post by fickman »

I know Chief Flory personally, and I missed this issue when it originally came up. I can tell you that he is a reasonable and responsible man. . . definitely more likely to line up with us than with the "stereotypical" police chiefs of the world. I have not spoken to him about this specific incident.

It sounds like the initial arrest was made due to either 1) this was assumed to be a correctional facility due to the presence of detainees, or 2) the police had to assume that the RN had been given proper written notice when her employer told them she had been. The police would / should know if the signs are posted legally or not, but they would have to take somebody's word on the personal written notification until they could investigate it.

It sounds like things worked out here, with the unfortunate consequence of the hospital learning about proper posting. Although, I didn't see proper posting on the maternity ward doors when I visited a friend there in March, 2010.
Native Texian
User avatar

03Lightningrocks
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 11456
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: Plano

Re: CHLer arrested in improperly posted hospital

#117

Post by 03Lightningrocks »

Plano Medical center emergency entrance is posted but the sign is impossible to see if you walk in through the revolving doors. I won't say anything more about it than oops! I had no desire to be a test case in that situation but it seems if the sign is not visable from the entrance, it would be invalid.

Pinkycatcher
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 490
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 4:25 pm
Location: Fort Worth

Re: CHLer arrested in improperly posted hospital

#118

Post by Pinkycatcher »

I read every single post, and it even made me pause Alton Brown! But I must say, it's the best outcome we can hope for given the situation, of course the hospital is going to post correct signs now that they know.

dihappy
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 907
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 8:00 pm
Location: San Antonio

Re: CHLer arrested in improperly posted hospital

#119

Post by dihappy »

Wow, good to hear it was dropped. But wouldnt this be a wrongful arrest?

What evidence did they have she actually "BROKE" the law, some supervisors/managers word that she was given "notice?

Doesnt a police officer have to have proof, or is heresay, word of mouth, proof enough?

Im no cop, but if i were, i would surely want to see this "written notice" for myself before i violated someones freedom.

This brings me to my initial conclusion that she was arrested under a misunderstanding of the law. The Lt's initial interview and error of the law is what im going by.
Image

Wildscar
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1402
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 4:04 pm
Location: Dallas Area

Re: CHLer arrested in improperly posted hospital

#120

Post by Wildscar »

Keith B wrote: Glad to hear they followed the letter of the law. However, this whole incident is the reason they are now posted with 30.06 signs. I will be willing to bet the manual now meets 30.06 wording too. :banghead:

And Charle's beat me to posting.
Don't bang your head to hard. I have it on very good authority that all the hospitals in the network are now properly posted. Including some of the parking lots. Just not all of them. However don't mention this too loud. The "Manual" has not been changed since 2007. That's all I'm sayin. :coolgleamA:
dihappy wrote:Wow, good to hear it was dropped. But wouldnt this be a wrongful arrest?

What evidence did they have she actually "BROKE" the law, some supervisors/managers word that she was given "notice?

Doesnt a police officer have to have proof, or is heresay, word of mouth, proof enough?

Im no cop, but if i were, i would surely want to see this "written notice" for myself before i violated someones freedom.

This brings me to my initial conclusion that she was arrested under a misunderstanding of the law. The Lt's initial interview and error of the law is what im going by.
Every employee is suppose to sign a little paper that they have received, read, and understand the "Manual." So letter of the law wise there nothing broken. Business wise there is. Certain people like to get the two confused.
Wildscar
"Far Better it is to dare mighty things than to take rank with those poor, timid spirits who know neither victory nor defeat." Theodore Roosevelt 1899
Beretta 92FS
Holster Review Resource
Project One Million:Texas - Click here and Join NRA Today!
Image
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”