Motorist Protection Act..Best kept secret in Texas

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

Tamie
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 366
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 9:42 am

Re: Motorist Protection Act..Best kept secret in Texas

#46

Post by Tamie »

rm9792 wrote:
SpringerFan wrote:Bought by me for her. I said nothing about registration.
But you implied it with "that is in my name ". The way it reads to some is that you think it is in fact registered in your name.
That's no different than buying jewelry for your wife.

rm9792
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 2177
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:07 pm

Re: Motorist Protection Act..Best kept secret in Texas

#47

Post by rm9792 »

Tamie wrote:
rm9792 wrote:
SpringerFan wrote:Bought by me for her. I said nothing about registration.
But you implied it with "that is in my name ". The way it reads to some is that you think it is in fact registered in your name.
That's no different than buying jewelry for your wife.
Very different, I dont fill out govt forms to buy jewelry, nor do i have to have the jewelry serial number called in.

Westfield
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 62
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 9:59 am
Location: San Antonio

Re: Motorist Protection Act..Best kept secret in Texas

#48

Post by Westfield »

The reporter on point 4 said "The gun must be in your name"....We don't register our guns in Texas. Why do reporters keep making up"facts" ?
User avatar

Oldgringo
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 11203
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:15 pm
Location: Pineywoods of east Texas

Re: Motorist Protection Act..Best kept secret in Texas

#49

Post by Oldgringo »

Westfield wrote:The reporter on point 4 said "The gun must be in your name"....We don't register our guns in Texas. Why do reporters keep making up"facts" ?


It sells print and/or airwaves.

aceat64
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 26
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 1:15 am

Re: Motorist Protection Act..Best kept secret in Texas

#50

Post by aceat64 »

rm9792 wrote:
Tamie wrote:
rm9792 wrote:
SpringerFan wrote:Bought by me for her. I said nothing about registration.
But you implied it with "that is in my name ". The way it reads to some is that you think it is in fact registered in your name.
That's no different than buying jewelry for your wife.
Very different, I dont fill out govt forms to buy jewelry, nor do i have to have the jewelry serial number called in.
The serial number doesn't get called in, they call in to do a background check on you. The only record of the sale is what the dealer keeps, such as the record in his "bound book", the 4473 Form and perhaps in his point of sale system. Nothing gets sent to the ATF, and if you have a CHL then the FFL doesn't even make a phone call to NICS. So it's actually quite similar to buying jewelry, the only difference is that the ATF can request a copy of the records from the FFL without a warrant.
User avatar

Fangs
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1229
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 9:18 pm
Location: San Marcos, TX

Re: Motorist Protection Act..Best kept secret in Texas

#51

Post by Fangs »

jimlongley wrote:
chartreuse wrote:
jamisjockey wrote:When you run out of facts, just make something up!
TV continues to propogate the myth that guns are registered in all but the most restrictive loacles in the country. One of my favorite shows is NCIS, but it drives me insane when they talk about someone living in Virginia and automatically the gun is in some mythical registration database. And, pre Heller, they were acting like people in DC had guns registered to them, too. The whole reason Heller happened is because DC was refusing registrations.
:rules:
That's the nature of such shows, though - they bend the truth to keep the story moving along. It's like when they get DNA matches back in hours (rather than the days or weeks it would take in real life) or worse digital forensics (I've seen backlogs of close to a year for hard drives).

And that's OK, really, when it's fictional entertainment. I guess the question is, has the mainstream news media abandoned its mission to inform and explain and just become another form of entertainment, bringing viewer eyeballs to commercials with no concern for the facts?
And the unlimited pixel resolution they get with parking lot security cameras.
http://www.abload.de/img/bb286ed153k8nk.jpg

Hehehehe, like this? ^
"When I was a kid, people who did wrong were punished, restricted, and forbidden. Now, when someone does wrong, all of the rest of us are punished, restricted, and forbidden. The one who did the wrong is counselled and "understood" and fed ice cream." - speedsix

KD5NRH
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 3119
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 3:25 am
Location: Stephenville TX

Re: Motorist Protection Act..Best kept secret in Texas

#52

Post by KD5NRH »

Fangs wrote:
jimlongley wrote:And the unlimited pixel resolution they get with parking lot security cameras.
http://www.abload.de/img/bb286ed153k8nk.jpg

Hehehehe, like this? ^
They should go over the Zapruder film like that :mrgreen:
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”