Agreerp_photo wrote:We should all resist the temptation to thumb our noses, boast that we've been doing it for awhile anyway, or discussing the matter with those we don't trust when it comes to gun matters.
Was that done here in this thread
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
Agreerp_photo wrote:We should all resist the temptation to thumb our noses, boast that we've been doing it for awhile anyway, or discussing the matter with those we don't trust when it comes to gun matters.
rp_photo wrote:We should all resist the temptation to thumb our noses, boast that we've been doing it for awhile anyway, or discussing the matter with those we don't trust when it comes to gun matters.
Know your rights and stay quiet.
Not that I know of, and it was meant to be a general comment.bronco78 wrote: Was that done here in this thread
In this case we won, in part due to the right kind of noise made in the past.speedsix wrote: ...we don't get our rights if we stay quiet...we just need to choose our battles wisely...
Amen.This new law will be an important step in keeping us safe going to anf from work. Especialy those side trips that have to made on the way home. I will feel safer.
If you're otherwise needed, you can do no wrong, otherwise you can do no right.cdcannon wrote:Call me paranoid, but I'm wondering if the protections in this law to prevent firings from still happening. This is still an "at will" employment state. It doesn't take much to find a reason to terminate someone. Good luck proving the actual cause of termination was due to having a firearm in your vehicle.
I think it will afford some protection. They are going to have to search your car to find your weapon, and they have to have good reason to search your car. A company may want to work against this law, but I do not think most companies want to spend the money defending their actions in court. I think it will be easier for them to just adopt a "look the other way" manner of thinking. However, time will tell. In a year we will know how this is working based on reports in the news, and on this forum. I don't know when new legislation has to be submitted by, but perhaps glaring gaps in the new law can be fixed in the next legislative session.cdcannon wrote:Call me paranoid, but I'm wondering if the protections in this law to prevent firings from still happening. This is still an "at will" employment state. It doesn't take much to find a reason to terminate someone. Good luck proving the actual cause of termination was due to having a firearm in your vehicle.
Companies are still allowed to have anti-gun policies in their buildings. When it comes to parking lots, it depends on the type of facility. For example, parking at the DOW offices on Enclave Pkwy in West Houston is likely protected by the law. However, the plants on the East side (e.g. Deer Park, La Porte) may meet the requirements for the loophole to prohibit firearms inside a secure area.CrimsonSoul wrote:question does this law affect places like DOW, or BASF, or are they allowed to still have no gun policies?
http://1withabullet.wordpress.com/2011/ ... exas-2011/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;stephengauntt wrote:Does the new law apply to employees of a university keeping guns in cars on staff lots