NYC testing a device to recognized concealed handguns

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton


Heartland Patriot

Re: NYC testing a device to recognized concealed handguns

#31

Post by Heartland Patriot »

steve817 wrote:I was thinking about cutting some letters out of aluminum foil and pasting them to an undershirt. Maybe a nice little Steve style greeting to Bloomberg that I of course can't post here.
But can you then be arrested for verbally assaulting a officer of the law? That is, since only law enforcement will have the means to see your message, can they use that against you? I mean, it IS NYC that we are talking about. How dare any mere peasants from fly-over country conspire against King Bloomberg! Off with their heads!
User avatar

Dragonfighter
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 2315
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 2:02 pm
Contact:

Re: NYC testing a device to recognized concealed handguns

#32

Post by Dragonfighter »

stroguy wrote:I guess you could just get your forearm tattooed to identify yourself, religion, political affiliation and so on.
Bar codes or serial encoded alpha-numerics.
I Thess 5:21
Disclaimer: IANAL, IANYL, IDNPOOTV, IDNSIAHIE and IANROFL
"There is no situation so bad that you can't make it worse." - Chris Hadfield, NASA ISS Astronaut

stroguy
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 356
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2011 12:07 am
Location: Spring TX

Re: NYC testing a device to recognized concealed handguns

#33

Post by stroguy »

I was thinking OCR or QR.....line up here citizens and get your coded tat. Line up here sheeple.
User avatar

tbrown
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1685
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011 4:47 pm

Re: NYC testing a device to recognized concealed handguns

#34

Post by tbrown »

Many of these countermeasures sound very complicated and prone to failure. I think a more simple and effective solution could follow the example of countermeasures that began in April 1775 against similar men enforcing gun control laws.
sent to you from my safe space in the hill country

Z1166
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 69
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 10:29 pm

Re: NYC testing a device to recognized concealed handguns

#35

Post by Z1166 »

stroguy wrote:I was thinking OCR or QR.....line up here citizens and get your coded tat. Line up here sheeple.

Nah, implanted RFID chip is the way to go. Can read the data without having to see the barcode. Think vehicles going through the EZ-Pass lane on a tollway.

I just heard about the terahertz (THz) technology NYC is planning to start using in the next 6 months (saw it on Face the Nation spoken some NYPD big-cheese). Just a matter of time until there will be units set up on the streets or at points of entry to public transit (think subway or bus station) and everyone gets a virtual pat down.
:fire :reddevil
User avatar

Excaliber
Moderator
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 6199
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 9:59 pm
Location: DFW Metro

Re: NYC testing a device to recognized concealed handguns

#36

Post by Excaliber »

Z1166 wrote:
stroguy wrote:I was thinking OCR or QR.....line up here citizens and get your coded tat. Line up here sheeple.

Nah, implanted RFID chip is the way to go. Can read the data without having to see the barcode. Think vehicles going through the EZ-Pass lane on a tollway.

I just heard about the terahertz (THz) technology NYC is planning to start using in the next 6 months (saw it on Face the Nation spoken some NYPD big-cheese). Just a matter of time until there will be units set up on the streets or at points of entry to public transit (think subway or bus station) and everyone gets a virtual pat down.
That may get entertaining unless they've figured out a way to discriminate weapons carried by LEO's from those carried by others.

An IFF beacon of some type perhaps??
Excaliber

"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." - Jeff Cooper
I am not a lawyer. Nothing in any of my posts should be construed as legal or professional advice.
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”