Qualifying

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton


Topic author
hbpaint
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 11:24 am

Re: Qualifying

#16

Post by hbpaint »

Thanks
Last edited by hbpaint on Mon Apr 01, 2013 2:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.

OldGrumpy
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 298
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:37 am
Location: DFW Metroplex

Re: Qualifying

#17

Post by OldGrumpy »

RX8er wrote:Me personally, I can understand forgetting something that happened 15-20 years ago. I've done that plenty of times.

But, I cannot not agree with intentionally leaving it off the app and signing my name to it.

And, I'll shut up now.
:patriot: :iagree: :txflag: Why would a person post in a public forum that they lied on a document that you can go to jail for falsifying?
Love God, Family, USA, and Texas
Act justly, love mercy, walk humbly with God - Micah 6:8

poppo
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 337
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 8:47 pm
Location: Texas

Re: Qualifying

#18

Post by poppo »

Personally I don't see how anyone can "forget" about an arrest. Now something like the bounced check thing maybe, but assault and resisting arrest? Seems like that would stick in ones head, especially when filling out the form.
USMC Retired - DAV Life Member - VFW Life Member - NRA Life Member
User avatar

03Lightningrocks
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 11453
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: Plano

Re: Qualifying

#19

Post by 03Lightningrocks »

poppo wrote:Personally I don't see how anyone can "forget" about an arrest. Now something like the bounced check thing maybe, but assault and resisting arrest? Seems like that would stick in ones head, especially when filling out the form.
LOL.... Yeah... I would remember resisting arrest and I do remember many of the fights I had as a misguided youth. I'm pretty sure fighting was OK for boys in those days. It didn't mean we had to shoot each other. The school would give us swats, make us shake hands and promise not to fight anymore. Now... Things are much more complicated. :rules:

Thing is folks... The OP got his CHL after providing the info from the courts. Apparently the state was ok with it. I can sure understand how a person might think something from many years ago would be insignificant to their behavior today... Especially if there were no felony convictions. Asking about legal issues from when we were minors is ignorant anyway. Many of us do stupid things as minors. We can't all be Greg or Marsha Brady! Some of us were more like Dennis the menace!

I am thinking we should say congrats and let it go rather than flogging it over and over again. Heck... I remember a thread where a guy was involved in meth. I think He got his CHL.

Personally, I think it is baloney we have to get the governments blessing to exercise a right guaranteed by the constitution! Anyone that can jump through these absurd hoops... More power to them. :patriot:

Asking what we did as minors??? Really?? Pretty ridiculous in my humble opinion.

alvins

Re: Qualifying

#20

Post by alvins »

well its up to the state to prove you intentionally lied so i would tell them good luck.

JP171
Banned
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1406
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 5:47 am
Location: San Leon Texas

Re: Qualifying

#21

Post by JP171 »

alvins wrote:well its up to the state to prove you intentionally lied so i would tell them good luck.

that's actually very easy, you omitted an arrest on your application, they found a record of the arrest. you omitted a material fact, a lie of omission is still a lie, you loose

carrydave
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 54
Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 4:03 pm

Re: Qualifying

#22

Post by carrydave »

I am new here, but perhaps others can learn from my experience.

For those who may have some memories that have escaped them, for a nominal fee you can acquire access to the DPS criminal database. Seems to me it would be good to check it out before you fill out your application.


a lie is deception, an omission can be done with intent to deceive or by mistake. with a 22 year window between I personally would ask for final disposition, and as long as you were not convicted I would issue it. If you were convicted I would make ya wait the requisite time and reapply. That being said, I'm just joe blow, and have no idea how the DPS will handle your case. Just my .02 (which is worse far less)
User avatar

tbrown
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1685
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011 4:47 pm

Re: Qualifying

#23

Post by tbrown »

JP171 wrote:
alvins wrote:well its up to the state to prove you intentionally lied so i would tell them good luck.

that's actually very easy, you omitted an arrest on your application, they found a record of the arrest. you omitted a material fact, a lie of omission is still a lie, you loose
Image
sent to you from my safe space in the hill country
User avatar

Jumping Frog
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5488
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 9:13 am
Location: Klein, TX (Houston NW suburb)

Re: Qualifying

#24

Post by Jumping Frog »

JP171 wrote:that's actually very easy, you omitted an arrest on your application, they found a record of the arrest. you omitted a material fact, a lie of omission is still a lie, you loose
There is that pesky concept called "knowingly".
-Just call me Bob . . . Texas Firearms Coalition, NRA Life member, TSRA Life member, and OFCC Patron member

This froggie ain't boiling! Shall not be infringed! Μολών Λαβέ

remington79
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 357
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 6:38 pm
Location: a little bit of everywhere

Re: Qualifying

#25

Post by remington79 »

With the amount of money (overpriced) A CHL costs in Texas DPS should be able to get the documents themselves. They should have access to that kind of info.
Sent to you from Galt's Gulch.

Topic author
hbpaint
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 11:24 am

Re: Qualifying

#26

Post by hbpaint »

Im out , Thanks
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”