Intentional police encounters by open carry/ chkpoint refuse

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton


Topic author
Brad Mc
Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 49
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 9:07 am

Intentional police encounters by open carry/ chkpoint refuse

#1

Post by Brad Mc »

I'm sure most of us have seen some of the videos on YouTube of people open carrying and filming the police encounters. There also many videos of immigration checkpoint refusals. My question to the forum is .. What is your take on this kind of behavior. Do you think it makes matters worse for open carry proponents? The immigration topic is a little different but in both cases, it is U.S citizens excercising their rights.
Feb 1, 2013 DPS received packet
Feb 26, 2013 DPS finally updated to BG under review
April 3, 2013 Manufacturing pending, April 4, 2013 Manufacturing
April 9, 2013 Mailed ... April 11, received chl
User avatar

baldeagle
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5240
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:26 pm
Location: Richardson, TX

Re: Intentional police encounters by open carry/ chkpoint re

#2

Post by baldeagle »

I think the more that LEOs get used to Americans asserting their rights, the better off we'll all be. The Americans so asserting had better be right, however, because if they are breaking the law they will go to jail.
The Constitution preserves the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation where the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. James Madison
NRA Life Member Texas Firearms Coalition member
User avatar

A-R
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5776
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 5:01 pm
Location: Austin area

Re: Intentional police encounters by open carry/ chkpoint re

#3

Post by A-R »

My opinions (and others') are expressed in these threads. Btw, I don't think your thread is a "duplicate" per se (yours is more general), but below threads can get your conversation off to a start.

viewtopic.php?f=83&t=61369&hilit=Markedguardian" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

viewtopic.php?f=15&t=64464&p=790577&hil ... an#p790577" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

2firfun50
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 307
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 12:45 pm
Location: Little Elm Tx
Contact:

Re: Intentional police encounters by open carry/ chkpoint re

#4

Post by 2firfun50 »

Brad Mc wrote:I'm sure most of us have seen some of the videos on YouTube of people open carrying and filming the police encounters. There also many videos of immigration checkpoint refusals. My question to the forum is .. What is your take on this kind of behavior. Do you think it makes matters worse for open carry proponents? The immigration topic is a little different but in both cases, it is U.S citizens excercising their rights.
In my opinion, any type of behavior which presents the subject as confrontational,in a child like manner, does far more harm than good. To undo a lot of the damage over the years, we must convince the vast majority that we are exceptional citizens. Texas CHL holders do exactly that with the data to prove it. We are well behaved sheep dogs who ( if we individually choose) pose an additional layer of protection from the wolves.

Whenever someone presents themselves as overly aggressive or confrontational, in the eyes of many, we all get painted with a broad brush. Its not good to upset the sheep as the farmer will have no use for you.

Since Texas CHL holders conduct themselves as upsatanding citizens and most sheep never know we're armed, no problem. :cheers2:

Topic author
Brad Mc
Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 49
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 9:07 am

Re: Intentional police encounters by open carry/ chkpoint re

#5

Post by Brad Mc »

Thanks for the links A-R. Alot of good stuff/opinions.
Feb 1, 2013 DPS received packet
Feb 26, 2013 DPS finally updated to BG under review
April 3, 2013 Manufacturing pending, April 4, 2013 Manufacturing
April 9, 2013 Mailed ... April 11, received chl
User avatar

nightmare69
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 2047
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2013 9:03 pm
Location: East Texas

Re: Intentional police encounters by open carry/ chkpoint re

#6

Post by nightmare69 »

This law student knows how to handle being stopped for open carry.

" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Thanks to this video Officers in alot of open carry states have been informed that they CANNOT approach someone just for open carry.
2/26-Mailed paper app and packet.
5/20-Plastic in hand.
83 days mailbox to mailbox.
User avatar

RX8er
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 1269
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2012 10:36 pm
Location: Northeast Fort Worth

Re: Intentional police encounters by open carry/ chkpoint re

#7

Post by RX8er »

nightmare69 wrote:This law student knows how to handle being stopped for open carry.

" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Thanks to this video Officers in alot of open carry states have been informed that they CANNOT approach someone just for open carry.
The only problem I have with this video is that he was "looking for a fight" and that is not good for the OC movement. I agree that we all should be forceful when pushing back on our rights but IMHO, it does no good to go looking for a fight to push an agenda. Amoung the anti crowd, this guy was bashed for wasting the officers time to picking fights to being defiant. On one site, a lady says "see, these gun grabbers are always just looking for a fight and don't listen to LEO. The officer could have been shot so we need to take guns away."

I ask an anti buddy of mine what he thinks of the protests and his comment is always about the redneck, foul mouth, EOTWAWKI, hick talkin', suspender shirtless guys that are unedumacated that he sees on the news. We need more guys in suites with educations talking intelligently about guns and our rights.
Final Shot offers Firearms / FFL Transfers / CHL Instruction. Please like our Facebook Page.
If guns kill people, do pens misspell words?
I like options: Sig Sauer | DPMS | Springfield Armory | Glock | Beretta
User avatar

nightmare69
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 2047
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2013 9:03 pm
Location: East Texas

Re: Intentional police encounters by open carry/ chkpoint re

#8

Post by nightmare69 »

RX8er wrote:The only problem I have with this video is that he was "looking for a fight" and that is not good for the OC movement. I agree that we all should be forceful when pushing back on our rights but IMHO, it does no good to go looking for a fight to push an agenda. Amoung the anti crowd, this guy was bashed for wasting the officers time to picking fights to being defiant. On one site, a lady says "see, these gun grabbers are always just looking for a fight and don't listen to LEO. The officer could have been shot so we need to take guns away."

I ask an anti buddy of mine what he thinks of the protests and his comment is always about the redneck, foul mouth, EOTWAWKI, hick talkin', suspender shirtless guys that are unedumacated that he sees on the news. We need more guys in suites with educations talking intelligently about guns and our rights.

He may have not been looking for a confrontation. Most everyone who has a modern cellphone has a video camera and alot of people record interaction with LEOs just for proof. Cops know that they cannot approach someone for a legal activity, but they do it anyway. If I lived in a all white neighborhood and saw a black guy driving down the road and called the cops do you think they would waste their time to stop him?

If cops get a call about someone open carrying then they should just do a drive by, if they see the person walking with a holstered firearm then they have no reason to stop them. Better yet when someone calls 911 and says someone is walking down main street with a holstered gun the dispatcher should inform the caller that its a legal activity and there is nothing they can do about it. The law student was right even though the cop said it was common practice to stop and question him its still illegal.
2/26-Mailed paper app and packet.
5/20-Plastic in hand.
83 days mailbox to mailbox.

Panda
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 144
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 1:45 pm

Re: Intentional police encounters by open carry/ chkpoint re

#9

Post by Panda »

If they're breaking the law, the cops should arrest them. If not, the police should determine that and move on. Enforce the actual laws instead of abusing their power to promote their personal prejudices. Just because someone is Latino doesn't mean they are an illegal alien. Just because someone is carrying a bible doesnt mean they bomb abortion clinics. Etc.
User avatar

TexasGal
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1701
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 1:37 am
Location: Fort Worth, TX

Re: Intentional police encounters by open carry/ chkpoint re

#10

Post by TexasGal »

LE should know the law and obey it just as citizens should. However, we see that the media loves fodder for their agenda to make gun owners look like loose cannons. Being insensitive to the current gun climate with these kinds of actions are playing into their hands. I personally do not want these people making public impressions for me.
The Only Bodyguard I Can Afford is Me
Texas LTC Instructor Cert
NRA Life Member
User avatar

jimlongley
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 6134
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 1:31 pm
Location: Allen, TX

Re: Intentional police encounters by open carry/ chkpoint re

#11

Post by jimlongley »

nightmare69 wrote:
RX8er wrote:The only problem I have with this video is that he was "looking for a fight" and that is not good for the OC movement. I agree that we all should be forceful when pushing back on our rights but IMHO, it does no good to go looking for a fight to push an agenda. Amoung the anti crowd, this guy was bashed for wasting the officers time to picking fights to being defiant. On one site, a lady says "see, these gun grabbers are always just looking for a fight and don't listen to LEO. The officer could have been shot so we need to take guns away."

I ask an anti buddy of mine what he thinks of the protests and his comment is always about the redneck, foul mouth, EOTWAWKI, hick talkin', suspender shirtless guys that are unedumacated that he sees on the news. We need more guys in suites with educations talking intelligently about guns and our rights.

He may have not been looking for a confrontation. Most everyone who has a modern cellphone has a video camera and alot of people record interaction with LEOs just for proof. Cops know that they cannot approach someone for a legal activity, but they do it anyway. If I lived in a all white neighborhood and saw a black guy driving down the road and called the cops do you think they would waste their time to stop him?

If cops get a call about someone open carrying then they should just do a drive by, if they see the person walking with a holstered firearm then they have no reason to stop them. Better yet when someone calls 911 and says someone is walking down main street with a holstered gun the dispatcher should inform the caller that its a legal activity and there is nothing they can do about it. The law student was right even though the cop said it was common practice to stop and question him its still illegal.
I don't consider myself confrontational, but I keep my smartphone camera ready just in case.
Real gun control, carrying 24/7/365

texanjoker

Re: Intentional police encounters by open carry/ chkpoint re

#12

Post by texanjoker »

He may have not been looking for a confrontation. Most everyone who has a modern cellphone has a video camera and alot of people record interaction with LEOs just for proof. Cops know that they cannot approach someone for a legal activity, but they do it anyway. If I lived in a all white neighborhood and saw a black guy driving down the road and called the cops do you think they would waste their time to stop him?

That is incorrect. An officer can contact anybody they wish, including somebody that is not doing anything wrong. That is a consensual encounter. The person is free to leave at any time.

I believe the people out there trying to be confrontational hurt more then they help. They are the ones that keep trying to egg the leo's on even when they won't play and are just doing their job. I would be curious how much real footage there is out there of these incidents, but when the leo's do the right thing they don't air it as that is against their agenda of drama.

rotor
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 3326
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:26 pm

Re: Intentional police encounters by open carry/ chkpoint re

#13

Post by rotor »

texanjoker wrote:
That is incorrect. An officer can contact anybody they wish, including somebody that is not doing anything wrong. That is a consensual encounter. The person is free to leave at any time.
From the video the LEO actually took the gun from the person involved. He kept asking for it back. I don't know if that was a consensual encounter (or even what that means) or not. I probably would have shown id but that is me. This guy will make one heck of a lawyer someday I guess. I thought the officer was very restrained and was being snowed by the smith vs jones legal briefs. Someone made a complaint, the people that took the complaint should have determined if the complaint was about an illegal activity. If open carry is legal in that area the 911 or whoever took the complaint should have told the person such. If the open carry person was acting strange, that would be a legitimate complaint in my mind. Open carry of a pressure cooker might get a complaint now. For all we know that may have been a staged complaint to the police just to produce a video like this. Felt a little sorry for the cop.
Last edited by rotor on Fri Apr 26, 2013 4:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar

nightmare69
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 2047
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2013 9:03 pm
Location: East Texas

Re: Intentional police encounters by open carry/ chkpoint re

#14

Post by nightmare69 »

texanjoker wrote:
He may have not been looking for a confrontation. Most everyone who has a modern cellphone has a video camera and alot of people record interaction with LEOs just for proof. Cops know that they cannot approach someone for a legal activity, but they do it anyway. If I lived in a all white neighborhood and saw a black guy driving down the road and called the cops do you think they would waste their time to stop him?

That is incorrect. An officer can contact anybody they wish, including somebody that is not doing anything wrong. That is a consensual encounter. The person is free to leave at any time.

I believe the people out there trying to be confrontational hurt more then they help. They are the ones that keep trying to egg the leo's on even when they won't play and are just doing their job. I would be curious how much real footage there is out there of these incidents, but when the leo's do the right thing they don't air it as that is against their agenda of drama.
That is true but the video I posted was not a consensual encounter, the law student asked a few times if he was free to leave, the LEO would not give him his gun back and let him leave.
2/26-Mailed paper app and packet.
5/20-Plastic in hand.
83 days mailbox to mailbox.
User avatar

jmra
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 10371
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:51 am
Location: Ellis County

Re: Intentional police encounters by open carry/ chkpoint re

#15

Post by jmra »

nightmare69 wrote:
texanjoker wrote:
He may have not been looking for a confrontation. Most everyone who has a modern cellphone has a video camera and alot of people record interaction with LEOs just for proof. Cops know that they cannot approach someone for a legal activity, but they do it anyway. If I lived in a all white neighborhood and saw a black guy driving down the road and called the cops do you think they would waste their time to stop him?

That is incorrect. An officer can contact anybody they wish, including somebody that is not doing anything wrong. That is a consensual encounter. The person is free to leave at any time.

I believe the people out there trying to be confrontational hurt more then they help. They are the ones that keep trying to egg the leo's on even when they won't play and are just doing their job. I would be curious how much real footage there is out there of these incidents, but when the leo's do the right thing they don't air it as that is against their agenda of drama.
That is true but the video I posted was not a consensual encounter, the law student asked a few times if he was free to leave, the LEO would not give him his gun back and let him leave.
:iagree:
LEO would not give him his gun back and let him leave. At this point it is no longer a consensual encounter. No brainer, the cop was dead wrong.
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
John Wayne
NRA Lifetime member
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”