I guess if you wanted to get real picky you could say there is an "i" missing in the word "prohibiting".
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Image](http://i92.photobucket.com/albums/l1/CYarborough/3006.jpg)
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
I knew it wouldn't be long for someone to chime in with letters appear to be to small, or missing the I, or some other ridiculous observation of the sign. Simple fact is if you want to be a test case go right ahead and ignore the sign. I just hope you have plenty of money because that is what it is going to take to defend youself, if you get caught.Venus Pax wrote:The sign looks a bit small.
Are the letters at least 1" high? I can imagine it would be difficult to notice while driving.
This cuts both ways.longtooth wrote:With all of the bove.
I OFTEN remember what our own all wise Charles Cotton said about being a test case.
"Those on the cutting edge of law usually bleed to death financially."
Actually it has already happened, it was at NASA in Houston recently.austin wrote:This cuts both ways.longtooth wrote:With all of the bove.
I OFTEN remember what our own all wise Charles Cotton said about being a test case.
"Those on the cutting edge of law usually bleed to death financially."
Sooner or later there will be a workplace shooting where a firm has banned CHL on their property.
This will open the firm to being sued for creating the conditions that led to the shooting by not allowing people to defend themselves.
This will go to trial and a jury will side with the families of the deceased.
The insurance costs will rise for firms that post signs due not only to the legal liability, but also to the acturarial analyses.