AJSully421 wrote:MeMelYup wrote:If you really want to cause an uproar, have HB308 address concealed carry only.
Their heads would explode.
"Advanced" LTC legislation opinions
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 6745
- Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:16 am
- Location: Hunt County
Re: "Advanced" LTC legislation opinions
Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence. - John Adams
-
- Site Admin
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 17787
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
- Location: Friendswood, TX
- Contact:
Re: "Advanced" LTC legislation opinions
I have two things in the works now, including relaunching the old CHLs United under a new banner of Good Guys United. It will be part of a larger project and there won't be any donations accepted for that limited movement. The plan is to launch everything by the end of January.AJSully421 wrote:So, what can an ordinary guy like myself do? Call and send emails once we have a bill number next year?Charles L. Cotton wrote:There was no real push-back, but that's because "we" didn't push the Bill. I was a lone wolf on that one.AJSully421 wrote:I really liked HB308. Other than spending way too much political capital on OC, were there any other push back issues from our side on any part of that bill?Charles L. Cotton wrote:The as-filed version of HB308 would have put CHLs in the same "Not applicable" section of §46.15 as peace officers. In short, we could carry everywhere a LEO can carry.TxAggieEngineer wrote:If I'm reading that correctly, HB 308 (46.15(5)(a)(5) would essentially invalidate 30.06 signs. Is that correct?Pawpaw wrote: Instead, in the 2017 legislative session, look for a bill similar to last session's HB 308.
I was not aware of that bill.
Chas.
Chas.
Chas.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 3509
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 11:52 pm
- Location: Alvin
- Contact:
Re: "Advanced" LTC legislation opinions
sounds interesting Mr Cotton. I'm really hoping by the next session we'll be back up in the Austin area and I can be as active as I'd like to be during the session.Charles L. Cotton wrote:I have two things in the works now, including relaunching the old CHLs United under a new banner of Good Guys United. It will be part of a larger project and there won't be any donations accepted for that limited movement. The plan is to launch everything by the end of January.AJSully421 wrote:So, what can an ordinary guy like myself do? Call and send emails once we have a bill number next year?Charles L. Cotton wrote:There was no real push-back, but that's because "we" didn't push the Bill. I was a lone wolf on that one.AJSully421 wrote:I really liked HB308. Other than spending way too much political capital on OC, were there any other push back issues from our side on any part of that bill?Charles L. Cotton wrote:The as-filed version of HB308 would have put CHLs in the same "Not applicable" section of §46.15 as peace officers. In short, we could carry everywhere a LEO can carry.TxAggieEngineer wrote:If I'm reading that correctly, HB 308 (46.15(5)(a)(5) would essentially invalidate 30.06 signs. Is that correct?Pawpaw wrote: Instead, in the 2017 legislative session, look for a bill similar to last session's HB 308.
I was not aware of that bill.
Chas.
Chas.
Chas.
~Tracy
Gun control is what you talk about when you don't want to talk about the truth ~ Colion Noir
Gun control is what you talk about when you don't want to talk about the truth ~ Colion Noir