Once more - 4413

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton


Topic author
wileyj
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 37
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 6:52 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Once more - 4413

#1

Post by wileyj »

My wife and I went to the Houston Museum of Natural Science today. There was a sign posted. It is not a 30.06 sign. It is a 4413e sign. I have seen them at car dealerships before and have complied with them in the past but I understand that unless it is a 30.06 it does not exclude my carrying.
Can you help me with this situation.

thanks
..wiley
Racing Miatas; Good cigars; Big guns
Houston, TX

txinvestigator
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 4331
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 6:40 pm
Location: DFW area
Contact:

Re: Once more - 4413

#2

Post by txinvestigator »

wileyj wrote:My wife and I went to the Houston Museum of Natural Science today. There was a sign posted. It is not a 30.06 sign. It is a 4413e sign. I have seen them at car dealerships before and have complied with them in the past but I understand that unless it is a 30.06 it does not exclude my carrying.
Can you help me with this situation.

thanks
..wiley
Racing Miatas; Good cigars; Big guns
Houston, TX
What is a 4413e sign?
*CHL Instructor*


"Speed is Fine, but accuracy is final"- Bill Jordan

Remember those who died, remember those who killed them.

Topic author
wileyj
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 37
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 6:52 pm
Location: Houston, TX

#3

Post by wileyj »

similar to this
Posession of a handgun under authority of Texas concealed handgun permit law (V.C.S. Art. 4413 (29ee)) is prohibited on these premises

..wiley
User avatar

quidni
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 791
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 12:04 am
Location: El Paso County
Contact:

#4

Post by quidni »

If that's all it's saying, it looks to me like they're using only part of the required wording from the 30.06 sign. Is this still considered legal notice under a different statute? :headscratch

Sec.30.06. Trespass by holder of license to carry concealed handgun.

(b)For purposes of this section, a person receives notice if the owner of the property or someone with apparent authority to act for the owner provides notice to the person by oral or written communication.
(c)In this section:
(1)"Entry" as assigned by Sec.30.05(b)
(2)"License holder' as assigned by Sec.46.035(f).
(3)"Written communication" means:
(A)a card or other document on which is written language identical to the following: "Pursuant to Section 30.06, Penal Code (trespass by holder of license to carry a concealed handgun), a person licensed under Art.4413(29ee), Revised Statutes (concealed handgun law), may not enter this property with a concealed handgun"; or
(B)a sign posted on the property that:
(i)includes the language described by Paragraph (A)in both English and Spanish;
(ii)appears in contrasting colors with block letters at least one inch in height; and
(iii)is displayed in a conspicuous manner clearly visible to the public.


From the TSRA website Selected Texas Firearm Statutes

(edited because somehow I managed to post it twice....)
TSRA / NRA
KA5RLA
All guns have at least two safeties. One's digital, one's cognitive. In other words - keep the digit off the trigger until ready to fire, and THINK. Some guns also have mechanical safeties on top of those. But if the first two don't work, the mechanical ones aren't guaranteed. - me

KBCraig
Banned
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 5251
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 3:32 am
Location: Texarkana

#5

Post by KBCraig »

wileyj wrote:similar to this
Posession of a handgun under authority of Texas concealed handgun permit law (V.C.S. Art. 4413 (29ee)) is prohibited on these premises

..wiley
I'll be that sign has been there since 1995. Similar signs popped up all over, particularly on local government buildings, when CHL first passed. The first version of the law didn't define "sufficient notice", which is why we now have 30.06 signs.

Since 30.06, signs like you saw are obsolete and not binding.

Kevin

GrillKing
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 615
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 12:35 pm

#6

Post by GrillKing »

quidni wrote: (A)a card or other document on which is written language identical to the following: "Pursuant to Section 30.06, Penal Code (trespass by holder of license to carry a concealed handgun), a person licensed under Art.4413(29ee), Revised Statutes (concealed handgun law), may not enter this property with a concealed handgun
That was from the TSRA website, however the actual statute says: "Pursuant to Section 30.06, Penal Code (trespass by holder of license to carry a concealed handgun), a person licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code (concealed handgun law), may not enter this property with a concealed handgun"

Personally, although the first above doesn't meet the statutory requirements of the penal code, I mean either it does or it doesn't, and this doesn't, it's close enough that I would not cross it with a concealed handgun. No test case for me....

GrillKing
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 615
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 12:35 pm

#7

Post by GrillKing »

wileyj wrote:similar to this
Posession of a handgun under authority of Texas concealed handgun permit law (V.C.S. Art. 4413 (29ee)) is prohibited on these premises

..wiley
However, I would ignore a sign worded as above..... Not even close to the requirement
User avatar

carlson1
Moderator
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 11830
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 1:11 am

#8

Post by carlson1 »

quidni wrote:If that's all it's saying, it looks to me like they're using only part of the required wording from the 30.06 sign. Is this still considered legal notice under a different statute? :headscratch
Good question. If that is the case is the Ghostbuster sign considered legal notice. The same as if they told you that you could not carry?

ElGato
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1073
Joined: Sun Dec 26, 2004 7:35 am
Location: Texas City, Texas
Contact:

#9

Post by ElGato »

a person licensed under Art.4413(29ee), Revised Statutes Texas Firearm Statutes[/url

If I remember right that wording was used from 97 to 99 then it changed to " a person licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Goverment Code" etc.
http://www.tomestepshooting.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I'm better at retirement than anything I have ever tried. Me
Young People pratice to get better, Old folk's pratice to keep from getting WORSE. Me

Scott Murray
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 110
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 9:15 pm
Location: Friendswood, Texas

#10

Post by Scott Murray »

Another point. Isn't the Houston Museum of Natural Science owned by the city of Houston? If so, they're not allowed to exclude CHL's from publicly owned facilities, except those provided in the law. And I don't remember that museum's were on the list.

Scott

Topic author
wileyj
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 37
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 6:52 pm
Location: Houston, TX

#11

Post by wileyj »

Legalities aside.
Obviously the Houston Museum of Natural Science intends that we do not carry there. (The even have the sign on the pedestrian door into the parking garage but not where you drive your car in????)
So, when I went back on Sunday I complied with the sign.
Letter of law vs Intent of Law.
Maybe they should be informed that if they truly do not want conceled carry, they should put up the correct signage
thanks for your replies
..wiley
Houston, TX

txinvestigator
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 4331
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 6:40 pm
Location: DFW area
Contact:

#12

Post by txinvestigator »

ElGato is correct, thanks to another website, I discovered that 4413 was changed in 1999 to Subchapter H of the Texas Government Code, section 411.

The current penal code in section 30.06 does not list 4413. The actual wording requirement is;


to the following: "Pursuant to Section 30.06, Penal Code (trespass by
holder of license to carry a concealed handgun), a person licensed under
Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code (concealed handgun law), may not enter this property with a concealed handgun"



The sign must have those IDENTICAL words, in both English and Spanish. Any deviation makes it un-enforceable.

Yes, it is possible that a LEO would not know the subtle difference in the law between the 1999 version and today. But as I have said before, I intend to obey the law. If I carry in a place that has a 4413 sign I am legal. If I keep my gun concealed as required, no LEO will know, and it will not be an issue. ;)
*CHL Instructor*


"Speed is Fine, but accuracy is final"- Bill Jordan

Remember those who died, remember those who killed them.

GrillKing
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 615
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 12:35 pm

#13

Post by GrillKing »

txinvestigator wrote: Yes, it is possible that a LEO would not know the subtle difference in the law between the 1999 version and today.
All I'm saying is the closer the sign is to meeting the requirement, the closer you are to potentially being arrested (if you don't conceal well, which kind of makes it your own fault) regardless of what the law says. In other words, if a word is mis-spelled on an otherwise valid notice, or a comma left out or the letters are 7/8" tall, I think you are at risk of being arrested if discovered. You may well win in court, but at what expense. If the letters are close to size, the words are identical but for a one or two, etc., I'll probably choose to lock it up in the car. Particularly in jurisdictions who have made it clear they intend to push 'enforement' to (ah, beyond) the limit (Houston comes to mind!). If its a "No Guns", ghostbuster, etc, that means nothing.

That's just my choice, others can do as they wish within the law. It's about personal risk / benefit analysis.
User avatar

stevie_d_64
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 7590
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 11:17 pm
Location: 77504

#14

Post by stevie_d_64 »

Houston pushing enforcement to a new level???

Nooooo, say it isn't so!

Thats the last straw!!! Where's the Bastille??? I'm stormin'!

Or as I was told this last weekend...Let the lawyers and lobby-ists do their thing...

Ok, you got 5 minutes... :lol: Then I'm putting on my super-suit! No cape!
"Perseverance and Preparedness triumph over Procrastination and Paranoia every time.” -- Steve
NRA - Life Member
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"
Μολών λαβέ!
User avatar

Paladin
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 6684
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:02 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Once more - 4413

#15

Post by Paladin »

wileyj wrote:My wife and I went to the Houston Museum of Natural Science today. There was a sign posted. It is not a 30.06 sign. It is a 4413e sign. I have seen them at car dealerships before and have complied with them in the past but I understand that unless it is a 30.06 it does not exclude my carrying.
Can you help me with this situation.

thanks
..wiley
Racing Miatas; Good cigars; Big guns
Houston, TX
Been there and seen the sign. Not a big deal at all. As stated, it's not a valid sign. Also, if you check, you'll find that there is no sign at other doors/entrances.

I had no problems carrying there.
JOIN NRA TODAY!, NRA Benefactor Life, TSRA Defender Life, Gun Owners of America Life, SAF, VCDL Member
LTC/SSC Instructor, NRA Certified Instructor, CRSO
The last hope of human liberty in this world rests on us. -Thomas Jefferson
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”