TexasCHLforum.com

Gun Fight Isn't OK wrote:
http://www.star-telegram.com/389/story/630050.html
Posted on Thu, May. 08, 2008
reprint or license print email
Digg it del.icio.us AIM
Gun fight isn't OK
Star-Telegram

Texas Land Commissioner Jerry Patterson takes his job seriously. Fine. But he sometimes takes too seriously duties that don't fall within his job description, like being interpreter of the U.S. Constitution and official czar for Second Amendment rights.

Patterson, whose title automatically makes him chairman of the School Land Board, is in charge of overseeing some state-owned property. His office has the power to invest in real estate to benefit the Permanent School Fund, which supports public education.

For months now, the commissioner has been at the center of a public fight involving a 14.5-square-mile tract in West Texas known as the Christmas Mountains, which was donated to the state in 1991. The gift came with the proviso that the land remain in state hands or be transferred to the National Park Service. An agreement at the time said the donor, a private foundation, had approval rights if the state wanted to dispose of the land in any other way.

Several months ago, the Texas General Land Office announced that it would take bids on the property, resulting in the donor crying foul and a public outcry against such a proposal. Many rightly argued that the land should go to the National Park Service, not some private individual or group.

Patterson went on the defensive, vowing never to transfer the property to the Park Service as long as that agency had restrictions on guns in parks. Although a majority of the three-member land board opposed their chairman and put the sale of the property on hold, the commissioner still insists that he has a duty to stand up and fight in the name of the Second Amendment.

He told a Texas House committee this week that the gun restrictions were unconstitutional and that he would not accept a U.S. Supreme Court ruling should it uphold a Washington, D.C., ban against handguns in a case that is before the high court.

Patterson's position on this matter is untenable, and his obstinate invocation of the gun issue in the discussion borders on obsession.

It is way past time to move on. Let's get on with transferring the Christmas Mountains to the National Park Service and save the gun battle for another day.

Commissioner Patterson's Response wrote: http://pod01.prospero.com/n/pfx/forum.a ... ortworthtm

"I, Jerry Patterson, do solemnly swear or affirm, that I will faithfully execute the duties of the office of Commissioner of the General Land Office of the State of Texas, and will to the best of my ability preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States and of this State, so help me God."

I understand that solemn oath as a commitment similar to the oath I took decades ago as an officer in the United States Marine Corps to "uphold and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic." I do not regard such affirmations as mere anachronistic formalities. I feel compelled to uphold these commitments even at the risk of my political future in the case of the oath of office as Commissioner, or of my life as in the case of my past career as a Marine.

You'll note that the above recitation DOES NOT STATE I "will preserve, protect, and defend the constitution and laws of the United States and of this state" ONLY WHEN APPLICABLE TO THE DUTIES OF LAND COMMISSIONER.

The 2nd Amendment provides that, "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

Art 1 Sec 23 of the Bill of Right of the Texas constitution also provides, "Every citizen shall have the right to keep and bear arms in the defense of himself or the State; but the Legislature shall have power, by law, to regulate the wearing of arms with a view to prevent crime."

Transferring 9300 acres to an agency of the federal government that clearly ignores these constitutionally enumerated rights would simply violate my oath of office. I can only assume that the Fort Worth Star-Telegram believes elected officials should not be expected to comply with their oaths of office.

The Fort Worth Star-Telegram may consider my position "untenable" and my zeal for the Bill of Rights "obstinate" and an "obsession," but I couldn't care less. In my opinion, any elected or appointed official at any level of government lacking the same zeal and commitment to the U.S. and Texas constitutions should be subject to impeachment.

I guess you can just call me an old-fashioned believer in the wisdom of those who penned the Bill of Rights and not much of a believer in the wisdom of editorial boards.

In the case of the Fort Worth Star-Telegram, it's not even close.

Jerry Patterson
Commissioner, Texas General Land Office
LtCol., USMCR, ret.

Cotton's Response wrote:It's refreshing to see an elected official that takes his oath of office seriously. As for the NPS having attorneys on staff, that is little comfort when this arm of the federal government ignores the Constitution. I am an attorney, not an elected official. I advocate and fight for my clients’ interests and that is what any staff attorney for the NPS does. Only recently has the NPS proposed changes to its regulations in order to standard laws regulating the legal carrying of self-defense handguns in both state parks and national parks. This came after 50+ Senators signed a letter demanding these changes, and with the threat of federal legislation to force the change. Prior to this letter, the NPS cared not one whit for the injustice that was suffered by honest citizens unknowingly crossing an invisible boundary between state-owned land and a national park and unintentionally becoming a criminal in the process.

To the Star-Telegram editorial staff, if you don't want the Texas Land Commissioner to abide by the entirety of his oath, then pray tell what other parts of the oath do you think are unimportant? I suspect you would not be so critical of an elected official refusing to do an act that infringed upon the First Amendment.

longtooth wrote:That sound like it could have come from Patrick Henry or another of his buddys.
Good job Gentlemen.

308nato wrote:We need to find more people like him and get them in office.

nedmoore wrote:Texas Monthly did a piece on him this month. It is the issue with "The Red Headed Stranger" on the cover.