Page 1 of 2
Charles twice mentioned in Cracked article
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2015 10:52 am
by CJD
Just thought you guys might enjoy the comedy. He's mentioned in #3 and #1.
http://www.cracked.com/blog/5-reasons-e ... te-nra_p1/
Re: Charles twice mentioned in Cracked article
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2015 10:58 am
by Abraham
Leftist tripe.
Re: Charles twice mentioned in Cracked article
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2015 11:23 am
by Charlies.Contingency
There's nothing I can say about this, we all know that these people are so lost in fantasy that they can't discern reality from fiction. They want to think that everything is perfect in their little world, and all the sensible people are crazy lunatics. I'm not sure if there is ANYTHING we can do to help them, as all they are doing is dooming themselves. It is very sad IMO.
Re: Charles twice mentioned in Cracked article
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2015 11:32 am
by Javier730
My opinion: The author of this, Luke Mckinney, is a moron. But thats just my opinion. I wonder who is pulling this puppets strings.
Re: Charles twice mentioned in Cracked article
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2015 12:52 pm
by joe817
Abraham wrote:Leftist tripe.
A LOT of it.
Re: Charles twice mentioned in Cracked article
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2015 12:55 pm
by psijac
I missed the days when cracked used to be funny.
They had some genuinely funny yet poorly researched articles.
Like "5 reasons you secretly want a zombie apocalypse"
"7 scientific reasons a zombie outbreak would fail"
Now it just on more social justice, outrage, click bait nonsense.
Re: Charles twice mentioned in Cracked article
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2015 4:05 pm
by John Galt
Charlies.Contingency wrote:There's nothing I can say about this, we all know that these people are so lost in fantasy that they can't discern reality from fiction. They want to think that everything is perfect in their little world, and all the sensible people are crazy lunatics. I'm not sure if there is ANYTHING we can do to help them, as all they are doing is dooming themselves. It is very sad IMO.
Spot-on!
Re: Charles twice mentioned in Cracked article
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2015 4:41 pm
by gthaustex
Sigh.....the comments from many are just as telling.
Re: Charles twice mentioned in Cracked article
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2015 4:50 pm
by Charlies.Contingency
John Galt wrote:Charlies.Contingency wrote:There's nothing I can say about this, we all know that these people are so lost in fantasy that they can't discern reality from fiction. They want to think that everything is perfect in their little world, and all the sensible people are crazy lunatics. I'm not sure if there is ANYTHING we can do to help them, as all they are doing is dooming themselves. It is very sad IMO.
Spot-on!
Thanks.
Re: Charles twice mentioned in Cracked article
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2015 4:51 pm
by Charlies.Contingency
gthaustex wrote:Sigh.....the comments from many are just as telling.
I couldn't stand reading through the comments, it just irritates me. So many keyboard warriors with no clue.
Re: Charles twice mentioned in Cracked article
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2015 5:16 pm
by jmra
It should be called "On Crack".
Re: Charles twice mentioned in Cracked article
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2015 5:38 pm
by treadlightly
That's pretty offensive stuff.
Re: Charles twice mentioned in Cracked article
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2015 9:27 pm
by Rex B
Charlies.Contingency wrote:There's nothing I can say about this, we all know that these people are so lost in fantasy that they can't discern reality from fiction. They want to think that everything is perfect in their little world, and all the sensible people are crazy lunatics. I'm not sure if there is ANYTHING we can do to help them, as all they are doing is dooming themselves. It is very sad IMO.
Trouble is they appear to be in the majority, and are about to bring the rest of us down with them.
Re: Charles twice mentioned in Cracked article
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2015 9:56 pm
by AJSully421
He pulls the usual "Insanity is doing the same thing and expecting a different result" line... meaning the second amendment.
How about gun free zones... how are those working out for us? How long have we been "doing the same thing" with gun free zones? How have our results turned out?
If every single person in that theater had a concealed handgun, that guy would have gone somewhere and quietly offed himself.. ok, maybe 160 decibels isn't so quiet, but you get my point.
Re: Charles twice mentioned in Cracked article
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2015 11:34 pm
by Redneck_Buddha
Rex B wrote:Charlies.Contingency wrote:There's nothing I can say about this, we all know that these people are so lost in fantasy that they can't discern reality from fiction. They want to think that everything is perfect in their little world, and all the sensible people are crazy lunatics. I'm not sure if there is ANYTHING we can do to help them, as all they are doing is dooming themselves. It is very sad IMO.
Actually, they are going to find out just how in the minority they are once they are yanked out of their little echo chambers. It will end badly for them.
Trouble is they appear to be in the majority, and are about to bring the rest of us down with them.