AndyC wrote:People want the quick-fix - it's easier to throw money at a problem by buying gadgets (or adopt "zero-tolerance policies" or install parental control software) than be bothered to either think or actually be responsible for doing something. Bloody silly idea.
Actually, this is all about money. The money is what the school gets from the State for student attendance days. What the tracking ID provides is evidence that the student was actually on campus that day so that the school district gets paid.
Like all stupid. bureaucratic ideas, it has its roots in a simple solution to the problem. Some of the unintended consequences are another matter:
- with the right access to the data, no student is safe from the prying eyes of an administrator. There are no checks and balances on this aspect and given the fact that sex abuse and other things happen within schools, the potential for corruption is significant.
- in order for the student to have the ID on them at school, they also have to take it home. RFID readers are not rocket science. By ordering the students to have them on, the students can be tracked to and from school as well as at home by anyone with the will and a small investment in the right technology. So the consequences of having it go a lot further than even the boundaries of the school campus. There is mitigation - there are bags etc. into which the RFID transmitter can be placed which would shield it being picked up off campus.
I doubt that the school has even mentioned this.
By the way, there are RFID chips in a lot of the new credit cards. Reading them by just being around you isn't difficult either.