Despite gun-control push, more states have cut back on gun r

[RPB]

Despite <illogical feelings-based> gun-control push, more states have cut back on gun regulations since Newtown

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/desp ... EAU1TQtDMD" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[TexDotCom]

Bets on where the majority of violence-with-guns will be in the next few years? I believe CT and CO are going to have their little happy bubbles burst because they didn't do anything that will make a difference.

NOTE: I say "violence-with-guns" instead of "gun violence" because firearms are not violent...they're inanimate objects controlled by human beings.

[tacticool]

Despite <illogical feelings-based> gun-control push, more states have cut back on gun regulations since Newtown

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/desp ... EAU1TQtDMD" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Meanwhile, the Republicans in Austin still won't pass open carry or campus carry. For both types of carry, Texas is among the minority of States that specifically prohibit the activity in State law. Despite that, they expect us to believe they are pro gun.

[AEA]

And I like your signature line!
They will get the message, one way or another!

[anygunanywhere]

Bets on where the majority of violence-with-guns will be in the next few years? I believe CT and CO are going to have their little happy bubbles burst because they didn't do anything that will make a difference.

NOTE: I say "violence-with-guns" instead of "gun violence" because firearms are not violent...they're inanimate objects controlled by human beings.

Why even use the term "violence with guns". Does every act need to be so defined? Voilence with a knife? Violence with a hammer? Violence with a fist?

Why not just call it all what it truly is - evil! Crime! Murder! Assault! All of the terms are already defined. Such specifics as gun violence are intended to be prejudicial agains firearms.

Anygunanywhere

[psijac]

Bets on where the majority of violence-with-guns will be in the next few years? I believe CT and CO are going to have their little happy bubbles burst because they didn't do anything that will make a difference.

NOTE: I say "violence-with-guns" instead of "gun violence" because firearms are not violent...they're inanimate objects controlled by human beings.

Why even use the term "violence with guns". Does every act need to be so defined? Voilence with a knife? Violence with a hammer? Violence with a fist?

Why not just call it all what it truly is - evil! Crime! Murder! Assault! All of the terms are already defined. Such specifics as gun violence are intended to be prejudicial agains firearms.

Anygunanywhere

They aren't allowed to say "urban" violence