mite
MITE!!!!!!
![Image](http://static.ddmcdn.com/gif/willow/mite-and-tick-info2.gif)
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
Do you have something against chowderheads?Abraham wrote:"Vulnerable" - Generally and duncishly pronounced Vunrable - as if the "L" in the word doesn't exist.
In the course of calling a business the receptionist asks: What "was" your name and I answer "It still is ..." and the chowderhead receptionist blithely doesn't acknowledge my sardonic response...when she should correct herself, but sadly, none have ever...
Did they save you 15% on your insurance?puma guy wrote:BTW it's owned by Warren Buffett, well actually Berkshire Hathaway. I eat there anyway.
If used in general conversation, I can see how this might be annoying. However, I can completely envision times where it might be appropriate to limit the terms under which a statement might be relevant. No, I don't have a good example near at hand. Am I being dense? I am not seeing how this would be a blanket 'verboten' phrase. (Yeah, I probably shouldn't have poked my head out of the hole my boss has stuck me in for the last few days and is insisting I stay in until the project is completed... absolutely required by the end of the week. Sigh. Solitude not fun for that long.Abraham wrote:Initiating sentences with: "In terms of..." arrrgggghhhh!
I'm convinced, some think bit of verbal sputum makes whatever they have to say sound like it contains heaping helpings of gravitas - when if fact it just sounds dorky...
Why not, tout de suite, state whatever it is you have to say without preamble?
Abraham wrote:LikesShinyThings,
You have my sympathy.
Truly.
I am , as usually, being silly and tongue in cheek.
I must say though, those who start off sentences with " In terms of..." make me want to scream"...
And why did she bring it to church?ginzu wrote:What was the widow doing with that?
hillfighter wrote:Did they save you 15% on your insurance?puma guy wrote:BTW it's owned by Warren Buffett, well actually Berkshire Hathaway. I eat there anyway.