Mosul falls to ISIS

Topics that do not fit anywhere else. Absolutely NO discussions of religion, race, or immigration!

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

Beiruty
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 9655
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 9:22 pm
Location: Allen, Texas

Re: Mosul falls to ISIS

#76

Post by Beiruty »

Last weekend, I met like 1/2 dozen of those contractors. What I am hearing, they act like body-guards here in US. To escort and protect personnel and like armed guard to protect assets (i.e. locations). They are not a militia or small private army. Blackwater incident was the most well known attack on civilian by those contracts, but not all contracts are the same. Finally, since they are lightly armed, they still need evacuation ASAP if they are mass attacked.
Beiruty,
United we stand, dispersed we falter
2014: NRA Endowment lifetime member
User avatar

baldeagle
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 13
Posts: 5240
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:26 pm
Location: Richardson, TX

Re: Mosul falls to ISIS

#77

Post by baldeagle »

Cedar Park Dad wrote:
baldeagle wrote:
Cedar Park Dad wrote:
gigag04 wrote:
Beiruty wrote:
AndyC wrote:
Cedar Park Dad wrote:Are these mercenaries? If so I could care less.
Define "mercenary", because I didn't meet any over there.
Hired private ex-soldiers, now AKA security contractors.
Why do we not care about them again?

I'm late to the party, I realize this, but I'm trying to catch up. I have some good buddies over there and in other parts of the world.
Live by the sword. Die by the sword.
You do realize that the country you live in exists, in good measure, because of mercenaries, right? It was Hessian mercenaries that trained the Americans to fight, thus contributing to their success in the Revolution.

And you also realize that our military are all mercenaries? IOW, they are paid to fight for us?
To equate our soldiers with mercenaries is...misplaced thinking.
To equate our contractors with mercenaries is...misplaced thinking.
The Constitution preserves the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation where the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. James Madison
NRA Life Member Texas Firearms Coalition member
User avatar

baldeagle
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 13
Posts: 5240
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:26 pm
Location: Richardson, TX

Re: Mosul falls to ISIS

#78

Post by baldeagle »

Unicorn Rancher wrote:
baldeagle wrote:You do realize that the country you live in exists, in good measure, because of mercenaries, right? It was Hessian mercenaries that trained the Americans to fight, thus contributing to their success in the Revolution.
What an interesting viewpoint on what the Hessians were doing on this side of the pond.
{{sigh}} I got my Hessians and Prussians mixed up. They all look the same to me. :biggrinjester:
The Constitution preserves the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation where the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. James Madison
NRA Life Member Texas Firearms Coalition member

Cedar Park Dad
Banned
Posts in topic: 27
Posts: 2064
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 7:19 am
Location: Cedar Park Texas

Re: Mosul falls to ISIS

#79

Post by Cedar Park Dad »

AndyC wrote:
Cedar Park Dad wrote:
Beiruty wrote:
AndyC wrote:
Cedar Park Dad wrote:Are these mercenaries? If so I could care less.
Define "mercenary", because I didn't meet any over there.
Hired private ex-soldiers, now AKA security contractors.
Exactly.
Fail. Try again.

The question was DEFINE mercenary. I don't care about your opinion - give me an actual legal definition. Surely you can Google something; it's not that hard.

Once more, with feeling: define "mercenary".

Nah. don't need to. If you're paid by a foreign government and carry a gun, you're a merc. Whatever you want to call it, the US has no interest in saving you.

Tic Tac
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 280
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 4:00 pm

Re: Mosul falls to ISIS

#80

Post by Tic Tac »

If somebody signs up for a job with generous hazard pay, complaining when the hazard becomes a reality seems a bit...
What's the word?
User avatar

baldeagle
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 13
Posts: 5240
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:26 pm
Location: Richardson, TX

Re: Mosul falls to ISIS

#81

Post by baldeagle »

Tic Tac wrote:If somebody signs up for a job with generous hazard pay, complaining when the hazard becomes a reality seems a bit...
What's the word?
If someone is hired to do a job and at the first sign of trouble, the employer bails, the employer is morally bankrupt. Welcome to Amerikka.
The Constitution preserves the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation where the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. James Madison
NRA Life Member Texas Firearms Coalition member
User avatar

Pawpaw
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 6745
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:16 am
Location: Hunt County

Re: Mosul falls to ISIS

#82

Post by Pawpaw »

Cedar Park Dad wrote:Nah. don't need to. If you're paid by a foreign government and carry a gun, you're a merc. Whatever you want to call it, the US has no interest in saving you.
You do realize you are insulting someone who was a security contractor for the US over in the sandbox, right? He has forgotten more about security contractors and mercenaries than you will ever learn.
Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence. - John Adams

Cedar Park Dad
Banned
Posts in topic: 27
Posts: 2064
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 7:19 am
Location: Cedar Park Texas

Re: Mosul falls to ISIS

#83

Post by Cedar Park Dad »

Pawpaw wrote:
Cedar Park Dad wrote:Nah. don't need to. If you're paid by a foreign government and carry a gun, you're a merc. Whatever you want to call it, the US has no interest in saving you.
You do realize you are insulting someone who was a security contractor for the US over in the sandbox, right? He has forgotten more about security contractors and mercenaries than you will ever learn.
Not insulting anyone. But if he was paid by a foreign power to carry a gun thats his business and his problem, not the United States.
User avatar

mojo84
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 9
Posts: 9043
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)

Re: Mosul falls to ISIS

#84

Post by mojo84 »

Cedar Park Dad wrote:
Pawpaw wrote:
Cedar Park Dad wrote:Nah. don't need to. If you're paid by a foreign government and carry a gun, you're a merc. Whatever you want to call it, the US has no interest in saving you.
You do realize you are insulting someone who was a security contractor for the US over in the sandbox, right? He has forgotten more about security contractors and mercenaries than you will ever learn.
Not insulting anyone. But if he was paid by a foreign power to carry a gun thats his business and his problem, not the United States.

What makes you think the people that are the subject within this thread are or were paid by a foreign government? It appears you've read the definition of mercenary and changed your tune.
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.

Cedar Park Dad
Banned
Posts in topic: 27
Posts: 2064
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 7:19 am
Location: Cedar Park Texas

Re: Mosul falls to ISIS

#85

Post by Cedar Park Dad »

mojo84 wrote:
Cedar Park Dad wrote:
Pawpaw wrote:
Cedar Park Dad wrote:Nah. don't need to. If you're paid by a foreign government and carry a gun, you're a merc. Whatever you want to call it, the US has no interest in saving you.
You do realize you are insulting someone who was a security contractor for the US over in the sandbox, right? He has forgotten more about security contractors and mercenaries than you will ever learn.
Not insulting anyone. But if he was paid by a foreign power to carry a gun thats his business and his problem, not the United States.

What makes you think the people that are the subject within this thread are or were paid by a foreign government? It appears you've read the definition of mercenary and changed your tune.

My original post asked if they were mercenaries. The reply was no they were for aircraft being sold to Iraq. Not sure what you're on about.
Now on a philophical basis on mercenaries, thats a different thread, but the US won't be risking US troops to help mercenaries, nor should they. Evidently this is not that instance.
User avatar

VMI77
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 10
Posts: 6096
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:49 pm
Location: Victoria, Texas

Re: Mosul falls to ISIS

#86

Post by VMI77 »

Cedar Park Dad wrote:
The same can be said for those who pack firearms. Those contractors are human beings, and more than likely American citizens.
They may be humans but there's no reason to go to war for them.
Can you clarify which government you think is paying these contractors? As far as I've seen, all are paid by either the US DOD or the US State Department. Now, if a contractor is not American I suppose you could call him a mercenary, but then, you realize, right, that the US military takes foreign nationals who want to become citizens of the US? To me, if someone is fighting on our side either in uniform or under contract and paid by the US government, they're one of ours...no matter where they're from originally.
"Journalism, n. A job for people who flunked out of STEM courses, enjoy making up stories, and have no detectable integrity or morals."

From the WeaponsMan blog, weaponsman.com
User avatar

mojo84
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 9
Posts: 9043
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)

Re: Mosul falls to ISIS

#87

Post by mojo84 »

Cedar Park Dad wrote:
Beiruty wrote:
AndyC wrote:
Cedar Park Dad wrote:Are these mercenaries? If so I could care less.
Define "mercenary", because I didn't meet any over there.
Hired private ex-soldiers, now AKA security contractors.
Exactly.

Here you go CPD. This is what I'm talking about. What you agreed with is NOT the definition of a mercenary. It's an American contractor.

I also gave you a link explaining why they are there and why we are " giving" them fighter jets. Based on the article, they purchased them.

It appears we should care about these people and make sure they get home.
Last edited by mojo84 on Tue Jun 17, 2014 2:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.

Cedar Park Dad
Banned
Posts in topic: 27
Posts: 2064
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 7:19 am
Location: Cedar Park Texas

Re: Mosul falls to ISIS

#88

Post by Cedar Park Dad »

VMI77 wrote:
Cedar Park Dad wrote:
The same can be said for those who pack firearms. Those contractors are human beings, and more than likely American citizens.
They may be humans but there's no reason to go to war for them.
Can you clarify which government you think is paying these contractors? As far as I've seen, all are paid by either the US DOD or the US State Department. Now, if a contractor is not American I suppose you could call him a mercenary, but then, you realize, right, that the US military takes foreign nationals who want to become citizens of the US? To me, if someone is fighting on our side either in uniform or under contract and paid by the US government, they're one of ours...no matter where they're from originally.
Equating them to US soldiers is quite humorous.

Cedar Park Dad
Banned
Posts in topic: 27
Posts: 2064
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 7:19 am
Location: Cedar Park Texas

Re: Mosul falls to ISIS

#89

Post by Cedar Park Dad »

mojo84 wrote:
Cedar Park Dad wrote:
Beiruty wrote:
AndyC wrote:
Cedar Park Dad wrote:Are these mercenaries? If so I could care less.
Define "mercenary", because I didn't meet any over there.
Hired private ex-soldiers, now AKA security contractors.
Exactly.

Here you go CPD. This is what I'm talking about. What you agreed with is NOT the definition of a mercenary. It's an American contractor.
Looks like a guard or a mercenary.
Guard, Philosophically I am more ok with, but I'm still not into sending US troops who didn't sign up for that to save them.
Post Reply

Return to “Off-Topic”