TexasCHLforum.com

I invite you to copy and paste the following to your Facebook page and email everyone who is either Democrat or sitting on the fence if you value your 2nd amendment rights. Thank you and God bless!

If you are a Democrat voting for Hillary, please do not yell at nor disparage your Trump voting Republican friends. They are decent folks, but just misled. Yelling at them will not persuade them. I invite you to lovingly show them the following videos instead. The hardest thing for people to suddenly admit is that you're deceived because this implies that the deceived is stupid. This is not true. The fault of the deception lies totally on the deceiver. When you think about it like that, you'll suddenly find yourself, Thinking Differently. BTW, this will be my LAST partisan FB post about the election. I hate these annoying people who post an endless stream of politics. I will NOT be one of these people.

Here's a powerful 15 second video to show your Republican friends:


Hillary's campaign is in a bit of trouble over Wikileaks. Here's how you can help:



The following video will help you understand Trump voters and give you some strategies to help you break through their brainwashing:
NO VIDEO LINK AVAILABLE AS IT KEEPS ON GETTING DELETED. You should be able to view a CENSORED version of Michael Moore's speech. PLEASE SEARCH YOUTUBE FOR "michael moore trump speech orlared"

I invite you to "share" and "like" this post.

Huh?

"If you are a Democrat voting for Hillary, please do not yell at nor disparage your Trump voting Republican friends. They are decent folks, but just misled."

Dadgummit. I'm misled.

parabelum wrote:Huh?

"If you are a Democrat voting for Hillary, please do not yell at nor disparage your Trump voting Republican friends. They are decent folks, but just misled."

Dadgummit. I'm misled.

What friends? She called GOPers, Conservatives, NRA, her enemies, in addition, to a dozen or so of disparaging labels. One favorite of mine Super gun nuts.

Beiruty wrote:

parabelum wrote:Huh?

"If you are a Democrat voting for Hillary, please do not yell at nor disparage your Trump voting Republican friends. They are decent folks, but just misled."

Dadgummit. I'm misled.

What friends? She called GOPers, Conservatives, NRA, her enemies, in addition, to a dozen or so of disparaging labels. One favorite of mine Super gun nuts.

I think that's why she just lumped us all together under the "Deplorable" label, it started taking too long to list all of her enemies. I guess we can count ourselves lucky, we are all still breathing. That can't be said about all of her enemies.

Beiruty wrote:

parabelum wrote:Huh?

"If you are a Democrat voting for Hillary, please do not yell at nor disparage your Trump voting Republican friends. They are decent folks, but just misled."

Dadgummit. I'm misled.

What friends? She called GOPers, Conservatives, NRA, her enemies, in addition, to a dozen or so of disparaging labels. One favorite of mine Super gun nuts.

I think that's why she just lumped us all together under the "Deplorable" label, it started taking too long to list all of her enemies. I guess we can count ourselves lucky, we are all still breathing. That can't be said about all of her enemies.

I'm confused, she said she was for the second amendment during the last debate.

striker55 wrote:I'm confused, she said she was for the second amendment during the last debate.

Silly you. She was referring to the second amendment to her phone contract, not the U.S. Constitution.

Remember this is the same lady who doesn't know that (c) means classified, despite having been trained on classification, and who's husband is not sure what the definition of "is" is. They are important people who understand that facts are fluid and ever changeable. It's only the little people who believe that words have definitions that cannot be changed on a whim.

Soccerdad1995 wrote:

striker55 wrote:I'm confused, she said she was for the second amendment during the last debate.

Silly you. She was referring to the second amendment to her phone contract, not the U.S. Constitution.

Remember this is the same lady who doesn't know that (c) means classified, despite having been trained on classification, and who's husband is not sure what the definition of "is" is. They are important people who understand that facts are fluid and ever changeable. It's only the little people who believe that words have definitions that cannot be changed on a whim.

And gun laws stop criminals from getting guns, just like laws regarding protecting State secrets, prevent criminals from mishandling them.

Jusme wrote:

Soccerdad1995 wrote:

striker55 wrote:I'm confused, she said she was for the second amendment during the last debate.

Silly you. She was referring to the second amendment to her phone contract, not the U.S. Constitution.

Remember this is the same lady who doesn't know that (c) means classified, despite having been trained on classification, and who's husband is not sure what the definition of "is" is. They are important people who understand that facts are fluid and ever changeable. It's only the little people who believe that words have definitions that cannot be changed on a whim.

And gun laws stop criminals from getting guns, just like laws regarding protecting State secrets, prevent criminals from mishandling them.

She is not lying when she says that she will not take your guns away. She is far too busy for that. She will order other people to take your guns away.

Soccerdad1995 wrote:

striker55 wrote:I'm confused, she said she was for the second amendment during the last debate.

Silly you. She was referring to the second amendment to her phone contract, not the U.S. Constitution.

Remember this is the same lady who doesn't know that (c) means classified, despite having been trained on classification, and who's husband is not sure what the definition of "is" is. They are important people who understand that facts are fluid and ever changeable. It's only the little people who believe that words have definitions that cannot be changed on a whim.

Good one, got a good laugh on that one. Lets see, she cant figure out that C is code for Classified. Yeah, thats a tough code. Bill needs clarification on the definition of the word is. LOL.

OK, my third video keeps on getting deleted. The most annoying thing is that nobody messaged me to tell me why. At first, I thought that it was because the video had a partially censored bad word in the automated photo pop up representation of the video. So, I found another video with a better photo. THAT was deleted, too. So, I am guessing that it is because the video had bad words in it. However, I warned of the bad words in my video link. Is this a Hillary conspiracy?!

[Remainder of post deleted.]

Banning them is the easy part. Getting them will be very costly.

I am amaze at what the Hillary voters are willing to overlook and ignore in order to support her. The thing worse than being "misled" voter is being an outright intellectually dishonest voter. Being a willing participant is less honorable than being unintentional "misled".

Donald Trump may be a slimeball shrewed businessman but he has not been shown to be an out and out socialist criminal that has jeopardized our national security. On top of all of that, the Clintons profited greatly from foreign governments while Clinton was SOS.

Actually, the marking (C) means that a particular paragraph is classified at the "Confidential" level. That said, disclosure of classified material of any classification level is a criminal act. As a career military officer, I have preferred charges against and sat on Courts Martial for personnel who did far less than HRC with classified material. All received "Less than Honorable" separation (usually Bad Conduct Discharge, but there were a couple of Dishonorables) from the AF and several received periods of confinement.