Frank Hamer book
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2019 9:32 am
After having watched the recent Netflix production, "The Highwaymen", TWICE, I decided to get a book or two on the life of Frank Hamer to learn more about the man. He was a complex character, with a rigid ethical sense, and operating in a time and place when law enforcement was often not on the side of the law. But other than his fame as the man who tracked down Bonnie & Clyde, I knew very little about his personal history.
Anyway, one of the two books I bought (for Kindle) is "Texas Ranger: the Epic Life of Frank Hamer, the Man Who Killed Bonnie and Clyde" by John Boesseneker. Holy cow! If only half of it is true, Hamer is a character worthy of a Homeric epic. However, the author provides plenty of eyewitness and documentary evidence to show that most or all of it is true. Where Hamer himself debunked parts of his legend, the author agrees and says why. He presents Hamer as a flawed man, with nearly iron control over his flaws - his principle flaw being anger. Not that he was angry all the time....he was not. In fact, he generally kept a very cool head, was easy-going and forgiving of the flaws of others in his personal life, and was not a man given to angry diatribes. But, he was also a man who held his personal honor dearly, and who was apt to respond with violence when his honor was impugned. Throughout the book so far (I haven’t finished it yet), Hamer ends up paying several court fines for having pistol-whipped men who drew his ire.
Anyway, I’m really enjoying reading this book, and thought I’d pass the recommendation on to others.
Anyway, one of the two books I bought (for Kindle) is "Texas Ranger: the Epic Life of Frank Hamer, the Man Who Killed Bonnie and Clyde" by John Boesseneker. Holy cow! If only half of it is true, Hamer is a character worthy of a Homeric epic. However, the author provides plenty of eyewitness and documentary evidence to show that most or all of it is true. Where Hamer himself debunked parts of his legend, the author agrees and says why. He presents Hamer as a flawed man, with nearly iron control over his flaws - his principle flaw being anger. Not that he was angry all the time....he was not. In fact, he generally kept a very cool head, was easy-going and forgiving of the flaws of others in his personal life, and was not a man given to angry diatribes. But, he was also a man who held his personal honor dearly, and who was apt to respond with violence when his honor was impugned. Throughout the book so far (I haven’t finished it yet), Hamer ends up paying several court fines for having pistol-whipped men who drew his ire.
Anyway, I’m really enjoying reading this book, and thought I’d pass the recommendation on to others.