building a light ar?

"A pistol is what you use to fight your way back to the rifle you never should have left behind!" Clint Smith, Thunder Ranch

Moderators: carlson1, Keith B


propellerhead
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 917
Joined: Tue May 09, 2006 9:12 am
Location: The part of Texas that isn't like Texas

Re: building a light ar?

#16

Post by propellerhead »

I had one from http://www.yhm.net" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;. As stated above, I bought the upper first then the lower a few weeks later. It cost me much less than their website price. Ask you FFL first if you know one personally. They often get discounted prices for being an FFL.
User avatar

OldCannon
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 3059
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 11:19 am
Location: Cedar Park, TX

Re: building a light ar?

#17

Post by OldCannon »

Here's a few torture tests by the NFA guys on these new lowers:

This the first one bangs the heck out of the fire control group (the test unit is pretty cool)
[youtube][/youtube]

This second one shows how the poly lower stands up to the same kind of pressures that would cause an aluminum lower would fail:
[youtube][/youtube]

This last one is them just giving an assembled system a good, old fashioned functional beating :cheers2:
[youtube][/youtube]
I don't fear guns; I fear voters and politicians that fear guns.

texasmusic
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 585
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2010 12:43 pm
Location: Katy

Re: building a light ar?

#18

Post by texasmusic »

They should have taken the lower to the same pressure the Aluminum one was seeing. They only matched deflections... the old aluminum one was seeing a lot more force.
Ubi libertas habitat ibi nostra patria est

PeteCamp

Re: building a light ar?

#19

Post by PeteCamp »

I am skeptical of it - not because it is polymer, but because there is no mention of where it is made. All polymer is not alike. Remember the old maxim: If it looks too good to be true, it just may be. Until I had proved it personally, it would be fine for a range toy, but there is no way I would bet my life on it. The mil-spec lower is just not that much more expensive or heavier.

Edit: Absolutely no disrespect intended to OldCannon here. :tiphat:
User avatar

OldCannon
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 3059
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 11:19 am
Location: Cedar Park, TX

Re: building a light ar?

#20

Post by OldCannon »

PeteCamp wrote:I am skeptical of it - not because it is polymer, but because there is no mention of where it is made. All polymer is not alike. Remember the old maxim: If it looks too good to be true, it just may be. Until I had proved it personally, it would be fine for a range toy, but there is no way I would bet my life on it. The mil-spec lower is just not that much more expensive or heavier.

Edit: Absolutely no disrespect intended to OldCannon here. :tiphat:
None taken. People didn't trust Glock polymer frames either ;-)

The fact that NFA backs their lowers up with a lifetime defect warranty says a lot about their faith in the product. I know that a poly lower won't be for everybody, just like for pistols -- something different to suit all needs. What I _do_ think is that this is a quality product at an absolutely rock bottom price, and I'm proud to be able to offer them. I don't take any offense at all if you just can't bring yourself to move away from aluminum.
I don't fear guns; I fear voters and politicians that fear guns.
User avatar

OldCannon
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 3059
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 11:19 am
Location: Cedar Park, TX

Re: building a light ar?

#21

Post by OldCannon »

Sorry to resurface this thread, but just wanted to say the order for 25 of these went out today. Everybody that has PM'ed me already gets priority at getting one!
I don't fear guns; I fear voters and politicians that fear guns.
Post Reply

Return to “Rifles & Shotguns”