Anyone ever tried this? Both a rifled slug AND three 00 buckshot in a 12-gauge shell ..... OUCH!
$14.99 + tax for 10 shells
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9053f/9053fa4366862267e91b27ad1c71db70f0384b88" alt="Image"
Yeah, those Remington HD rounds were sitting right next to these on the shelf and they were $24 for 10 shells ... OUCHfannypacker wrote:I haven't seen that but I have a bedroom pump gun with 5 Remington rounds that are intended for home defense. The rounds are a mixture of #2 and # 4 shot in the same hull. I have tested for feeding and ejection but have not fired it. Reminton calls theirs "HD, the ultimate home defense."
I'll find you a .30 handgun round that will beat that - 7.62x25 Tokarev. They push upwards of 1700fps.austinrealtor wrote:
So far I've had best luck (as far as patterning on cardboard) with the top-of-the-line Federal Premium law enforcement buckshot. Groups into 3 inch square at 15 yards with a 20-inch barrel - that's the equivalent of NINE .32-caliber bullets moving at 1300 fps muzzle velocity (find me a .32 that will do that) all at the same time .... you ain't gettin up from that.
Yes, but it costs a lot in taxes and takes months for the paperwork to have one that will do it 18 times with a single trigger pull. This sends 18 1300fps pellets downrange five times for $9 with express shipping available.NcongruNt wrote:I'll find you a .30 handgun round that will beat that - 7.62x25 Tokarev.
Thanks for the link. I agree, based on those results, I'm not impressed. Seems this is no more effective that standard slug round AND adds in the possibility of a flyer from one of the errant buckshot striking an innocent bystander or at best damaging property.foo.c wrote:There's a thread on xdtalk about this ammo. The spread is too much, IMO.
Over penetrate.glbedd53 wrote:Looks like a gimmick to me. Whats it gonna do that 00 won't do?