NY Rep Peter King proposes new gun law

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

Dragonfighter
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2315
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 2:02 pm
Contact:

Re: NY Rep Peter King proposes new gun law

#16

Post by Dragonfighter »

powerboatr wrote: maybe we just look for dummies walking around spouting garbage from their pie holes and we assume they are elected officials :mrgreen:
Or firemen.
I Thess 5:21
Disclaimer: IANAL, IANYL, IDNPOOTV, IDNSIAHIE and IANROFL
"There is no situation so bad that you can't make it worse." - Chris Hadfield, NASA ISS Astronaut
User avatar

PappaGun
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 743
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 5:34 pm
Location: After 4:30 you can usually find me at a Brew Pub

Re: NY Rep Peter King proposes new gun law

#17

Post by PappaGun »

The Annoyed Man wrote:
...Third, what do they think they are? Royalty? :banghead:
They believe in American Exceptionalism... their own.
"Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe."
- Noah Webster

"All we ask for is registration, just like we do for cars."
- Charles Schumer
User avatar

Fangs
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1229
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 9:18 pm
Location: San Marcos, TX

Re: NY Rep Peter King proposes new gun law

#18

Post by Fangs »

hirundo82 wrote:You know, we wouldn't have problems like these shootings if we would just get around to banning murder already.
:iagree:

You'd think someone would have thought about that already... :headscratch

I propose we ban politicians, that would be 100% effective in preventing shootings on politicians. :thumbs2:
"When I was a kid, people who did wrong were punished, restricted, and forbidden. Now, when someone does wrong, all of the rest of us are punished, restricted, and forbidden. The one who did the wrong is counselled and "understood" and fed ice cream." - speedsix
User avatar

Purplehood
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 4638
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:35 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: NY Rep Peter King proposes new gun law

#19

Post by Purplehood »

Ban politicians from saying things that we don't like, instead of the other way around.

Sheesh!
Life NRA
USMC 76-93
USAR 99-07 (Retired)
OEF 06-07
User avatar

A-R
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 5776
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 5:01 pm
Location: Austin area

Re: NY Rep Peter King proposes new gun law

#20

Post by A-R »

Jon Stewart, an admitted liberal but one with an open mind who has defended gun owners and 2A-RKBA before, had a great response both King's 1,000-foot bill and Brady's perceived threatening language bill.

http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-j ... f-the-bans" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar

MasterOfNone
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1276
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:00 am
Location: Dallas
Contact:

Re: NY Rep Peter King proposes new gun law

#21

Post by MasterOfNone »

I am always intrigued by the lack of reason shown by the idea of proposing a new law to keep people from breaking a much more severe law that they plan to break anyway. "I don't mind committing murder, but there's no way I'm going to break that 1000 foot rule." Somehow, I just don't see even the dumbest criminal thinking that way (excluding the dumb criminals who propose such things).
http://www.PersonalPerimeter.com
DFW area LTC Instructor
NRA Pistol Instructor, Range Safety Officer, Recruiter
User avatar

tacticool
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1486
Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 2:41 pm

Re: NY Rep Peter King proposes new gun law

#22

Post by tacticool »

The Annoyed Man wrote:Third, what do they think they are? Royalty? :banghead:
It seems like it. Shows how much they know about the US Constitution. (Article I, Section 9)

Look at how much press this criminal attack got, compared to a convenience store robbery or home invasion.

Look at the flags being lowered, even in non-Arizona states, when the same isn't done to honor hard working US citizens and taxpayers.

The most logical explanation is they think they're royalty and more important than the common people.
When in doubt
Vote them out!

bnc
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 548
Joined: Fri May 07, 2010 7:34 pm

Re: NY Rep Peter King proposes new gun law

#23

Post by bnc »

The Annoyed Man wrote: Third, what do they think they are? Royalty? :banghead:
Since most Royalty believe they were ordained by God to rule on Earth, being Royalty would be a step down from where most politicians place themselves.

Poldark
Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 183
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 9:11 pm
Location: Parker County

Re: NY Rep Peter King proposes new gun law

#24

Post by Poldark »

King interview.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/laura-i ... -proposal/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Term Limits, Please.

MeMelYup
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1874
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2010 3:21 pm

Re: NY Rep Peter King proposes new gun law

#25

Post by MeMelYup »

sjfcontrol wrote:
gigag04 wrote:One of my partners had a great reply when we discussed this. I'll edit it, but it was something to effect of:

Well, on the flip side those [guys] will have to wear a big [stinking] red sign saying "federal official no guns" in order to prove someone intentionally carried within 1000 ft of them. :rules:
I propose they declare a symbol to mark "federal officials". I suggest one of Sarah Palin's
"crosshair" emblems, inside a big red circle with a slash thru it. The symbol must be at least 12 inches tall, in contrasting colors, in both English and Spanish, and be conspicuously displayed on each official.
You saying thay need a politicians badge?

RPB
Banned
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 8697
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: NY Rep Peter King proposes new gun law

#26

Post by RPB »

MeMelYup wrote:
sjfcontrol wrote:
gigag04 wrote:One of my partners had a great reply when we discussed this. I'll edit it, but it was something to effect of:

Well, on the flip side those [guys] will have to wear a big [stinking] red sign saying "federal official no guns" in order to prove someone intentionally carried within 1000 ft of them. :rules:
I propose they declare a symbol to mark "federal officials". I suggest one of Sarah Palin's
"crosshair" emblems, inside a big red circle with a slash thru it. The symbol must be at least 12 inches tall, in contrasting colors, in both English and Spanish, and be conspicuously displayed on each official.
You saying thay need a politicians badge?
The Annoyed Man wrote: what do they think they are? Royalty? :banghead:
Commander wrote:Heard on Fox tonight that NY Rep Peter King ...:???:
Not a badge, just a royal tiara and royal sash, like the CHL tiara and CHL sash ... but ... royal blue maybe.
I'm no lawyer

"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"

Katygunnut
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 710
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 9:34 pm

Re: NY Rep Peter King proposes new gun law

#27

Post by Katygunnut »

So does that mean no Federal Official can come within 1,000 feet of my property? I might actually like that. What if you live next to one of them thar Federal Officials? Do you have to leave home when they are in their house, or vice versa?

I would like to see a ban on Federal officials coming within 1,000 feet of any US Citizen. After all US Citizens have the right to keep and bear arms, and we need to keep the Feds safe. Since the Feds work for the citizens, the onus should be on them to leave the area IMHO.

Ameer
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1397
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 8:01 pm

Re: NY Rep Peter King proposes new gun law

#28

Post by Ameer »

Katygunnut wrote:I would like to see a ban on Federal officials coming within 1,000 feet of any US Citizen. After all US Citizens have the right to keep and bear arms, and we need to keep the Feds safe. Since the Feds work for the citizens, the onus should be on them to leave the area IMHO.
"rlol"

Build a wall around DC and don't let anything in or out!
I believe the basic political division in this country is not between liberals and conservatives but between those who believe that they should have a say in the personal lives of strangers and those who do not.
User avatar

A-R
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 5776
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 5:01 pm
Location: Austin area

Re: NY Rep Peter King proposes new gun law

#29

Post by A-R »

Ameer wrote:
Katygunnut wrote:I would like to see a ban on Federal officials coming within 1,000 feet of any US Citizen. After all US Citizens have the right to keep and bear arms, and we need to keep the Feds safe. Since the Feds work for the citizens, the onus should be on them to leave the area IMHO.
"rlol"

Build a wall around DC and don't let anything in or out!
That's what we would do if they were zombies instead of merely Congress Critters. (by the way, we need a zombie smiley)
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”