HB 1068 Support No Front Plates

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton


CWOOD
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 730
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 12:54 pm
Location: Austin, TX

Re: HB 1068 Support No Front Plates

#16

Post by CWOOD »

I am mildly against this.

In a former life long ago and not so far away I was a Texas State Trooper.

The front license plate can be useful to patrol officers. Especially in the night time it can assist in correctly identifying a vehicle which you have encountered traveling in an opposite direction and for some reason have determined that there was a need to turn, pursue and make contact.

It could be a stolen, warrant, Amber alert vehicle, or it might have had indications of DWI such as crossing the center line or fail to dim headlights. Officers can often see and recall the plate number, or at least a partial, and if you are at night and turn to make contact, it is much easier to get the 'right' one out of a string of vehicles if you have that bit of information.

For what it is worth.
SIGN UP! The National Alliance for an Idiot Free America
User avatar

74novaman
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 3798
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 7:36 am
Location: CenTex

Re: HB 1068 Support No Front Plates

#17

Post by 74novaman »

CWOOD wrote:Officers can often see and recall the plate number, or at least a partial, and if you are at night and turn to make contact, it is much easier to get the 'right' one out of a string of vehicles if you have that bit of information.

For what it is worth.
well, color me impressed. At night, I have never been able to see anything coming my way at night except for :idea: :idea: :idea: :idea: .
TANSTAAFL
User avatar

WildBill
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 17350
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Houston

Re: HB 1068 Support No Front Plates

#18

Post by WildBill »

74novaman wrote:well, color me impressed. :idea: :idea: :idea: :idea:
:smilelol5: An LEO could read the plate during daytime.

I can't imagine any groups other than LE and prosecutors opposing this bill. Of course, they both have a very strong voice and have the most to lose if it passed.
NRA Endowment Member
User avatar

cheezit
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1158
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 9:10 pm
Location: far n fortworh

Re: HB 1068 Support No Front Plates

#19

Post by cheezit »

The Annoyed Man wrote:In California, you won't get ticketed for not having a front plate. However, you WILL get ticketed for backing into a parking space in a public lot so that the plateless front of your vehicle is facing outward.

You do realize that this is where you are ultimately headed, right?

Just seeking clarity...
IIRC last I recall it was now a fix it ticket for no front plate there. I could be way off though.

Im for no front plate too. they get in the way wheile working on an engine. ive torn more pants that way. they do ugly up the front end. they are not cost effective and there for serve no point.
User avatar

WildBill
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 17350
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Houston

Re: HB 1068 Support No Front Plates

#20

Post by WildBill »

cheezit wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:In California, you won't get ticketed for not having a front plate. However, you WILL get ticketed for backing into a parking space in a public lot so that the plateless front of your vehicle is facing outward.

You do realize that this is where you are ultimately headed, right?

Just seeking clarity...
IIRC last I recall it was now a fix it ticket for no front plate there. I could be way off though.
Even though it may be a "fix it ticket" it is still a legal reason to be pulled over and ... whatever else comes next.
NRA Endowment Member
User avatar

WildBill
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 17350
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Houston

Re: HB 1068 Support No Front Plates

#21

Post by WildBill »

cheezit wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:In California, you won't get ticketed for not having a front plate. However, you WILL get ticketed for backing into a parking space in a public lot so that the plateless front of your vehicle is facing outward.

You do realize that this is where you are ultimately headed, right?
This reminds me of a friend in California who, many years ago, owned a car with a broken transmission - It couldn't shift into reverse. He had to park his car so that he wouldn't have to back up. :lol:
NRA Endowment Member

Grog
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 311
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 12:36 am
Location: Mesquite TX

Re: HB 1068 Support No Front Plates

#22

Post by Grog »

Bullwhip wrote:Let's get rid of inspections too.

South Carolina did that in the mid 90s and the cars are still as safe/unsafe as before.


I'm more worried about the drivers than the cars :biggrinjester:

cbr600

Re: HB 1068 Support No Front Plates

#23

Post by cbr600 »

deleted
Last edited by cbr600 on Wed Apr 06, 2011 12:37 am, edited 1 time in total.

Grog
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 311
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 12:36 am
Location: Mesquite TX

Re: HB 1068 Support No Front Plates

#24

Post by Grog »

cbr600 wrote:
Then again, NC also had unlicensed open carry without any real problems. :lol:

GATTTOTP has been a very real concern in liberal areas for years, it's not always an open and shut case of 100% easy open carry.
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 26853
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: HB 1068 Support No Front Plates

#25

Post by The Annoyed Man »

cheezit wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:In California, you won't get ticketed for not having a front plate. However, you WILL get ticketed for backing into a parking space in a public lot so that the plateless front of your vehicle is facing outward.

You do realize that this is where you are ultimately headed, right?

Just seeking clarity...
IIRC last I recall it was now a fix it ticket for no front plate there. I could be way off though.

Im for no front plate too. they get in the way wheile working on an engine. ive torn more pants that way. they do ugly up the front end. they are not cost effective and there for serve no point.
I never knew anyone to get pulled over for lack of a front plate (they're usually behind you when they light you up, but I've known several to get ticketed in parking lots, my dear wife included.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar

Liberty
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 6343
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 8:49 pm
Location: Galveston
Contact:

Re: HB 1068 Support No Front Plates

#26

Post by Liberty »

The Annoyed Man wrote: I never knew anyone to get pulled over for lack of a front plate (they're usually behind you when they light you up, but I've known several to get ticketed in parking lots, my dear wife included.
Sounds to me as though some department is overstaffed, with officers who have nothing better to do. Most municipalities are looking at cost cutting and this department looks like it could use a little trimming.

Just guessing.
Liberty''s Blog
"Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom." John F. Kennedy

Thomas

Re: HB 1068 Support No Front Plates

#27

Post by Thomas »

Grog wrote:
Bullwhip wrote:Let's get rid of inspections too.

South Carolina did that in the mid 90s and the cars are still as safe/unsafe as before.


I'm more worried about the drivers than the cars :biggrinjester:
I don't mind the safety inspection, it's the emissions inspection I dread every year. Only a few more years until it's a safety-inspection-only car :mrgreen:
User avatar

Excaliber
Moderator
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 6198
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 9:59 pm
Location: DFW Metro

Re: HB 1068 Support No Front Plates

#28

Post by Excaliber »

CWOOD wrote:I am mildly against this.

In a former life long ago and not so far away I was a Texas State Trooper.

The front license plate can be useful to patrol officers. Especially in the night time it can assist in correctly identifying a vehicle which you have encountered traveling in an opposite direction and for some reason have determined that there was a need to turn, pursue and make contact.

It could be a stolen, warrant, Amber alert vehicle, or it might have had indications of DWI such as crossing the center line or fail to dim headlights. Officers can often see and recall the plate number, or at least a partial, and if you are at night and turn to make contact, it is much easier to get the 'right' one out of a string of vehicles if you have that bit of information.

For what it is worth.
I agree.

A front plate isn't critical to law enforcement, but it is pretty useful for accurately identifying vehicles in a number of situations, e.g. fleeing suspects and surveillances.

You don't always get to pick a spot to watch from that has a good angle for reading the rear tags. At other times you are positioned so you have an adequate amount of time to read an approaching tag on the front, but only a moment to get a look at the departing tag due to turns, shrubbery, etc.

I recognize that there are associated costs and inconvenience involved, and I won't cry whichever way things go, but from an LE perspective I'd like to see the front tag remain as a requirement.
Excaliber

"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." - Jeff Cooper
I am not a lawyer. Nothing in any of my posts should be construed as legal or professional advice.
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 26853
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: HB 1068 Support No Front Plates

#29

Post by The Annoyed Man »

Liberty wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote: I never knew anyone to get pulled over for lack of a front plate (they're usually behind you when they light you up, but I've known several to get ticketed in parking lots, my dear wife included.
Sounds to me as though some department is overstaffed, with officers who have nothing better to do. Most municipalities are looking at cost cutting and this department looks like it could use a little trimming.

Just guessing.
This was in California. Cost-cutting isn't even in the lexicon. Other cities do this too, but it happened to my wife in Montrose, between Glendale and La Crescenta. There is an "old town" section with a lot of restaurants and boutiques along the main drag, with acres of public parking behind the buildings. The parking PO-PO cruise through those lots, partly to make sure you don't overstay your welcome, but also looking for other infractions they can ticket you for. They bagged my wife for parking facing outward, and actually, she had a front plate. But they told her that the law was on the books to stop people who had rear plates only from backing into spaces where their plates were harder to get to and read. In California, your annual registration stickers go on the rear license plate.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT

rm9792
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 2177
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:07 pm

Re: HB 1068 Support No Front Plates

#30

Post by rm9792 »

The Annoyed Man wrote:
cheezit wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:In California, you won't get ticketed for not having a front plate. However, you WILL get ticketed for backing into a parking space in a public lot so that the plateless front of your vehicle is facing outward.

You do realize that this is where you are ultimately headed, right?

Just seeking clarity...
IIRC last I recall it was now a fix it ticket for no front plate there. I could be way off though.

Im for no front plate too. they get in the way wheile working on an engine. ive torn more pants that way. they do ugly up the front end. they are not cost effective and there for serve no point.
I never knew anyone to get pulled over for lack of a front plate (they're usually behind you when they light you up, but I've known several to get ticketed in parking lots, my dear wife included.

I have been pulled over on many occasions for no front plates on my mustang. They use it as an excuse to go fishing but always let me go when the see the old bald guy roll the window down (tinted windows). I used to work nights in the bad parts of town so they assumed I was a kid looking for trouble is my best guess. The officers were always friendly and I never got a ticket.
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”